effet du nombre des graphèmes en Anglais - Aix Marseille Université

196BibliographiePerea, M., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 24, 767-779.Peter, M., & Turvey, M., T. (1994). Phonological codes are early sources of constraint in visual semanticcategorization. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 497-504.Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., Posner, M. I., Mintun, M., & Raichle, M. E. (1988). Positron emission tomographicstudies of cortical anatomy of single-word processing. Nature, 331, 585-588.Pierce, J. R., & Karlin, J. E. (1957). Reading rate and the information rate of a human channel. Bell SystemTechnical Journal, 36, 497-516.Pisoni, D. B., Nusbaum, H. C., Luce, P. A., & Slowiaczek, L. M. (1985). Speech perception, word recognitionand the structure of the lexicon. Speech Communication, 4, 75-95.Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. M., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal andimpaired word reading : Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review,103, 1, 56-115.Poepple, D. (1996). A critical review of PET studies of phonological processing. Brain, 55, 317-351.Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.Pring, L. (1981). Phonological codes and functional spelling units : Reality and implications. Perception andPsychophysics, 30, 573-578.Prinzmetal, W. (1981). Principles of feature integration in visual perception. Perception & Psychophysics,30, 330-340.Prinzmetal, W. (1990). Neon colors illuminate reading units. Journal of Experimental Psychology : HumanPerception and Performance, 16, 584-597.Prinzmetal, W., Treiman, R., & Rho, S. H. (1986). How to see a reading unit. Journal of Memory and Language,25, 461-475.Pugh, K. R., Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Constable, R. T., Skudlarski, P., Fulbright, R. K., Bronen,R. A., Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L, Fletcher, J. M., & Gore, J. (1996). Cerebral organization ofcomponent processes in reading. Brain, 119, 1221-1238.Pulvermuller, F., Lutzenberger, W., & Birbaumer, N. (1995). Electrocortical distinction of vocabulary types.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 94, 357-370.Rapp, B. C., 1992. The nature of sublexical orthographic organization : The bigram trough hypothesis examined.Journal of Memory and Language 31, 33-53.Rastle, K. & Coltheart, M. (1998). Whammy and double whammy : Length effects in nonword naming.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 277-282.Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and analysis of distribution statistics. PsychologicalBulletin, 86, 446-461.Ratcliff, R., & Murdock, B. B. (1976). Retrieval processes in recognition memory. Psychological Review,83, 190-214.Read, J. D. (1983). Detection of F's in a single statement : The role of phonological recoding. Memory andCognition, 11, 390-399.Reggia, J. A., Marsland P. M., & Berndt, R. S. (1988). Competitive dynamics in a dual-route connectionistmodel of print-to-sound translation. Complex Systems, 2, 509-517.Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journalof Experimental Psychology, 81, 274-280.Rey, A., Grainger, J., Chesnet, D., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Jacobs, A.M. (soumis). LIP : A Luminance IncreasingProcedure.