194BibliographieMewhort, D. J. K., & Beal, A. L. (1977). Mechanism of word id<strong>en</strong>tification. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 629-640.Mewhort, D. J. K., Braun, J. G., & Heathcote, A. (1992). Response time distributions and the stroop task :A test of the Coh<strong>en</strong>, Dunbar, and McClelland (1990) model. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology :Human Perception and Performance, 18, 872-882.Meyer, D. E., Osman, A. M., Irwin, D. E., & Yantis, S. (1988). Modern m<strong>en</strong>tal chronometry. BiologicalPsychology, 26, 3-67.Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Ruddy, M. G. (1974). Functions of graphemic and phonemic co<strong>des</strong> invisual word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 2, 309-321.Millis, M. L. (1986). Syllables and spelling units affect feature integration in words. Memory and Cognition,14, 409-419.Millis, M. L., & Button, S. B. (1989). The effect of polysemy on lexical decision time : Now you see it,now you don’t. Memory and Cognition, 17, 141-147.Monsell, S. (1991). The nature and locus of word frequ<strong>en</strong>cy effects in reading. In D. Besner and G. W. Humphreys(Eds.), Basic Processes in Reading : Visual Word Recognition (pp. 148-197). Hillsdale NJ :Erlbaum.Monsell, S., Doyle, M., C., & Haggard, P., N. (1989). Effects of frequ<strong>en</strong>cy on visual word recognition tasks: where are they ? Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psycholology : G<strong>en</strong>eral, 118, 43-71.Montant, M. (1998). Les étapes de traitem<strong>en</strong>t pré-lexical dans la reconnaissance visuelle <strong>des</strong> mots : Approchecomportem<strong>en</strong>tale et neuropsychologique. Thèse de Doctorat de l’Université de Prov<strong>en</strong>ce.Montant, M., Nazir, T., & Poncet, M. (1998). Pure alexia and the viewing position effect in printed words.Cognitive Psychology, 15, 93-140.Morton, J., & Patterson, K. E. (1980). A new attempt at an interpretation, or, an attempt at a new interpretation.In M. Coltheart, K.E. Patterson, & J.C. Marshall (Eds.), Deep dyslexia. London : Routledge &Kegan Paul.Mozer, M. C. (1987). Early parallel processing in reading : A connectionist approach. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Att<strong>en</strong>tion and Performance : Vol 12. The psychology of reading(pp. 83-104). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.Murrel, G. A., & Morton, J. (1974). Word recognition and morphemic structure. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>talPsychology, 102, 963-968.Naish, P. (1980). The effects of graphemic and phonemic similarity betwe<strong>en</strong> targets and masks in a backwardvisual masking paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology, 32, 57-68.Nazir, T. A. (1993). On the relation betwe<strong>en</strong> the optimal and the preferred viewing position in words <strong>du</strong>ringreading. In : G. d'Ydewalle & J. van R<strong>en</strong>sberg<strong>en</strong> (eds.), Perception & Cognition : Advances in eyemovem<strong>en</strong>t research, (pp. 349 - 361). Amsterdam : North-Holland.Nazir, T. A., Heller, D., & Suβmann, C. (1992). Letter visibility and word recognition : The optimal viewingposition in printed words. Perception and Psychophysics, 52, 315-328.Nazir T. A., Jacobs A. M., & O'Regan J. K. (1998). Letter legibility and visual word recognition. Memoryand Cognition.Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition : A selective review of curr<strong>en</strong>t findingsand theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading : Visual wordrecognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York : Appleton-C<strong>en</strong>tury-Crofts.Nietzsche, F. (1883). Ainsi parlait Zarathoustra. Tra<strong>du</strong>ction et édition au format de poche (1983) : LibrairieGénérale Française.Norris, D. (1994). A quantitative multiple-levels model of reading aloud. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 6, 1212-1232.
Bibliographie 195Norris, D., & Brown, G. (1985). Race models and analogy theories : A dead heat ? Reply to Seid<strong>en</strong>berg.Cognition, 20, 155-168.Nuërk, H. C., Rey, A., Graf, R., & Jacobs, A. M. (soumis). Subcompon<strong>en</strong>t frequ<strong>en</strong>cy (SCF) : A phonology-basedsublexical measure for visual word recognition.Olzak, L. A., & Thomas, J. P. (1986). Seeing spatial patterns. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas(Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. II, pp. 7 :1-7 :56). New York : Wiley.O'Regan, J. K., & Jacobs, A. M. (1992). Optimal viewing position effect in word recognition : a chall<strong>en</strong>ge tocurr<strong>en</strong>t theory. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Human Perception & Performance, 18, 185-197.O'Regan, J. K., Lévy-Scho<strong>en</strong>, A., Pynte, J., & Brugaillère, B. (1984). Conv<strong>en</strong>i<strong>en</strong>t fixation location withinisolated words of differ<strong>en</strong>t l<strong>en</strong>gth and structure. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Human Perceptionand Performance, 10, 250-257.Paap, K. R., & Noel, R. W. (1991). Dual-route models of print to sound : Still a good horse race. PsychologicalResearch, 53, 13-24.Parkin, A. J. (1982). Phonological recoding in lexical decision : Effect of spelling-to-sound regularity dep<strong>en</strong>d onhow regularity is defined. Memory & Cognition, 10, 43-53.Parkin, A. J. (1984). Redefining the regularity effect. Memory & Cognition, 12, 287-292.Parkin, A. J., McMull<strong>en</strong>, M., & Graystone, D. (1986). Spelling-to-sound regularity affects pronounciationlat<strong>en</strong>cies but not lexical decision. Psychological Research, 48, 87-92.Patterson, K. (1982). The realtion betwe<strong>en</strong> reading and phonological coding : Further neuropsychologicalobservations. In A. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions. New York : AcademicPress. (pp. 77-111)Patterson, K. E., Marshall, J. C., & Coltheart, M. (1985). Surface dyslexia : Neuropsychological and cognitivestudies of phonological reading. Erlbaum : London.Patterson, K. E., & Morton, J. (1985). From orthography to phonology : An attempt at an old interpretation. InK. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia : Neuropsychological and cognitivestudies of phonological reading (pp. 15-34). Hove : Erlbaum.Paulesu, E., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1993). The neural correlates of the verbal compon<strong>en</strong>t ofworking memory. Nature, 362, 342-345.Pavio, A., & O’Neill, B. J. (1970). Visual recognition thresholds and dim<strong>en</strong>sions of word meaning. Perception& Psychophysics, 8, 273-275.Perfetti, C. A., & Bell, L. C. (1991). Phonemic activation <strong>du</strong>ring the first 40 ms of word id<strong>en</strong>tification :Evid<strong>en</strong>ce from backward masking and priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 473-485.Perfetti, C. A., Bell, L. C., & Delaney, S. M. (1988). Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in sil<strong>en</strong>treading : Evid<strong>en</strong>ce from backward masking. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 59-70.Peereman, R., & Cont<strong>en</strong>t, A. (1995). The neighborhood size effect in naming : lexical activation or sublexicalcorrespond<strong>en</strong>ces. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 409-421.Peereman, R., & Cont<strong>en</strong>t, A. (1997). Orthographic and phonological neighborhoods in naming : Not allneighbors are equally influ<strong>en</strong>cial in orthographic space. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 382-410.Peereman, R., Cont<strong>en</strong>t, A., & Bonin, P. (1998). Is perception a two-way street ? The case of feedback consist<strong>en</strong>cyin visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 151-174.P<strong>en</strong>nac, D. (1992). Comme un roman. Editions Gallimard.Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequ<strong>en</strong>cy and syllable neighborhood frequ<strong>en</strong>cy in visualword recognition. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 24,134-144.
- Page 1:
UNIVERSITÉ DE PROVENCE, AIX-MARSEI
- Page 4 and 5:
Ce travail clôt un cycle de format
- Page 6 and 7:
CHAPITRE 7 : LE FUM . . . . . . . .
- Page 8 and 9:
8IntroductionPour cela, notre domai
- Page 10 and 11:
10Introduction• au niveau lexical
- Page 12 and 13:
12Introduction• sa forme visuelle
- Page 14 and 15:
14IntroductionAprès avoir posé le
- Page 16 and 17:
16Méthodologiespulations sur les i
- Page 18 and 19:
18Méthodologies2.1. Protocoles exp
- Page 20 and 21:
20Méthodologiessi le stimulus se t
- Page 22 and 23:
22MéthodologiesCertaines études t
- Page 24 and 25:
24Méthodologiestes, on obtient des
- Page 26 and 27:
26Méthodologies1996 ; Peter & Turv
- Page 28 and 29:
28Méthodologiesles performances da
- Page 30 and 31:
30Méthodologies6 %8%10%15%30%50%80
- Page 32 and 33:
32MéthodologiesMatériel expérime
- Page 34 and 35:
34Méthodologiesentraîne le masqua
- Page 36 and 37:
36MéthodologiesLe même résultat
- Page 38 and 39:
38Méthodologies120100Situation Sta
- Page 40 and 41:
Chapitre 3Orthographe et phonologie
- Page 42 and 43:
42Orthographe et Phonologie3.1. Var
- Page 44 and 45:
44Orthographe et PhonologieLa Figur
- Page 46 and 47:
46Orthographe et PhonologieJacobs,
- Page 48 and 49:
48Orthographe et Phonologiedans la
- Page 50 and 51:
50Orthographe et PhonologieDans l
- Page 52 and 53:
52Orthographe et Phonologieteurs du
- Page 54 and 55:
54Orthographe et PhonologieGoldstei
- Page 56 and 57:
56Orthographe et Phonologietion est
- Page 58 and 59:
58Orthographe et Phonologierand, 19
- Page 60 and 61:
60Orthographe et Phonologieplus ad
- Page 62 and 63:
62Orthographe et Phonologie3.2.3.1.
- Page 64 and 65:
64Orthographe et PhonologiePlus ré
- Page 66 and 67:
66Orthographe et PhonologieUne autr
- Page 68 and 69:
68Orthographe et Phonologiedeux var
- Page 70 and 71:
Chapitre 4Modèles de la perception
- Page 72 and 73:
72Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 74 and 75:
74Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 76 and 77:
76Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 78 and 79:
78Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 80 and 81:
80Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 82 and 83:
82Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 84 and 85:
84Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 86 and 87:
86Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 88 and 89:
88Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 90 and 91:
90Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 92 and 93:
92Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 94 and 95:
94Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 96 and 97:
96Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 98 and 99:
98MROM-pspécifier leur lien avec l
- Page 100 and 101:
100MROM-pphonèmes reliés par un r
- Page 102 and 103:
102MROM-pLorsque le modèle génèr
- Page 104 and 105:
104MROM-pque ce système artificiel
- Page 106 and 107:
106Unités de la lecturelinguistiqu
- Page 108 and 109:
108Unités de la lecture22606TR (ms
- Page 110 and 111:
110Unités de la lecturemes. Aussi
- Page 112 and 113:
112Unités de la lecturephonologiqu
- Page 114 and 115:
114Unités de la lectureelle-même
- Page 116 and 117:
116Unités de la lecture6.3. Expér
- Page 118 and 119:
118Unités de la lectureRead est qu
- Page 120 and 121:
120Unités de la lectureces modèle
- Page 122 and 123:
122Unités de la lecturechapitre su
- Page 124 and 125:
124FUMmultiples existant au sein de
- Page 126 and 127:
126FUMpar Berndt, Lynne D'Autrechy
- Page 128 and 129:
128FUMcessus de compétition et du
- Page 130 and 131:
130FUMgène et suit les principes c
- Page 132 and 133:
132FUMPseudohomophonesContrôles Or
- Page 134 and 135:
134FUM61023TR (ms) Seidenberg et al
- Page 136 and 137:
136FUMportementaux et les résultat
- Page 138 and 139:
138FUMà une entité extérieure au
- Page 140 and 141:
Chapitre 8Des prédictionsau niveau
- Page 142 and 143:
142Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 144 and 145: 144Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 146 and 147: 146Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 148 and 149: 148Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 150 and 151: 150Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 152 and 153: 152Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 154 and 155: 154Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 156 and 157: 156Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 158 and 159: 158Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 160 and 161: 160Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 162 and 163: 162Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 164 and 165: 164Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 166 and 167: 166Les mots polysyllabiquesmots mon
- Page 168 and 169: 168Les mots polysyllabiquesTableau
- Page 170 and 171: 170Les mots polysyllabiques9.2. Exp
- Page 172 and 173: 172Les mots polysyllabiques19001890
- Page 174 and 175: 174Les mots polysyllabiquesnexe XI
- Page 176 and 177: 176Les mots polysyllabiques9.4. Dis
- Page 178 and 179: 178ConclusionConclusion« La grande
- Page 180 and 181: 180Conclusionplutôt un système o
- Page 182 and 183: 182Conclusiontester les prédiction
- Page 184 and 185: 184BibliographieAderman, D., & Smit
- Page 186 and 187: 186BibliographieBrysbaert, M., Vitu
- Page 188 and 189: 188BibliographieFerrand, L., Segui,
- Page 190 and 191: 190BibliographieGrainger, J., & Jac
- Page 192 and 193: 192BibliographieKay, J., & Bishop,
- Page 196 and 197: 196BibliographiePerea, M., & Pollat
- Page 198 and 199: 198BibliographieSeidenberg, M. S.,
- Page 200 and 201: 200BibliographieTreiman, R., & Zuko
- Page 202 and 203: 202AnnexesAnnexes
- Page 204 and 205: 204AnnexesAnnexe II : Temps de rép
- Page 206 and 207: 206AnnexesAnnexe IV : Temps de rép
- Page 208 and 209: 208Annexesd t 88 3 fixed fI%tdd d 3
- Page 210 and 211: 210Annexesoo u 3395 57 too tuoo $ 5
- Page 212 and 213: 212AnnexesAnnexe VI : Liste des 120
- Page 214 and 215: 214AnnexesAnnexe VII : Détail des
- Page 216 and 217: 216AnnexesSujets Stim. Erreur Sujet
- Page 218 and 219: 218AnnexesSujet Moyenne % Err ES Su
- Page 220 and 221: 220AnnexesAnnexe X : Stimuli employ
- Page 222 and 223: 222AnnexesAnnexe XI : Stimuli emplo
- Page 224 and 225: 224Appendice IMROM-P : An interacti
- Page 226 and 227: 226Appendice Ilanguages (French, Ge
- Page 228 and 229: 228Appendice Isummed frequency of f
- Page 230 and 231: 230Appendice IClearly, the ability
- Page 232 and 233: 232Appendice Ito an orthographic le
- Page 234 and 235: 234Appendice IFigure 6 gives an ill
- Page 236 and 237: 236Appendice Iestimator set study,
- Page 238 and 239: 238Appendice ISTEP 3. CRITERION SET
- Page 240 and 241: 240Appendice Iteractive processes o
- Page 242 and 243: 242Appendice INotwithstanding, a no
- Page 244 and 245:
244Appendice I1994). Our stratagem
- Page 246 and 247:
246Appendice ILass, U. (1995). Einf
- Page 248 and 249:
248Appendice IAPPENDIXA1. Cleaning
- Page 250 and 251:
250Appendice IIA phoneme effect in
- Page 252 and 253:
252Appendice IIAs shown in Table 1,
- Page 254 and 255:
254Appendice IImay depend on their
- Page 256 and 257:
Appendice III
- Page 258 and 259:
258Appendice IIIHowever, an unsolve
- Page 260 and 261:
260Appendice IIIgrapheme compared t
- Page 262 and 263:
262Appendice IIIRead, J. D. (1983).
- Page 264:
264Appendice IIIAppendix AMean resp