effet du nombre des graphèmes en Anglais - Aix Marseille Université

Bibliographie 193Lukatela, G., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (1990). Phonemic, associative, and grammatical context effectswith identified and unidentified primes. Language and Speech, 33, 1-18.Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1990a). Automatic and pre-lexical computation of phonology in visual wordidentification. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 325-343.Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1990b). Phonemic similarity effects and prelexical phonology. Memory andCognition, 18, 128-152.Mandelblit, N., & Zachar, O. (1998). The notion of dynamic unit : Conceptual developments in cognitivescience. Cognitive Science, 22, 229-268.Manguel, A. (1998). Une histoire de la lecture. Editions Actes Sud.Marcel, A. J. (1980). Surface dyslexia and beginning reading : A revised hypothesis of the pronounciation ofprint and its impairments. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, J.C. Marshall (Eds.), Deep dyslexia. London: Routeledge, and Chapman & Hall. (pp. 227-258)Marcel, A. J. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perception : Experiments on visual masking and wordrecognition. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 197-237.Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco : Freeman.Marshall, J. C., & Newcombe, F. (1973). Patterns of paralexia : A psycholinguistic approach. Journal ofPsycholinguistic Research, 2, 175-199.Martin, H.-J. (1988). Histoire et pouvoirs de l’écrit. Première édition : Librairie Académique Perrin. Editionau format de poche (1996) : Albin Michel, Paris.Martin, R. C. (1982). The pseudohomophone effect : The role of visual similarity in nonword decisions.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34A, 395-409.Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1994). Visual, orthographic, phonological, and lexical influences inreading. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1107-1128.Massaro, D., W., & Klitzke, D. (1979). The role of lateral masking and orthographic structure in letter andword recognition. Acta Psychologica, 43, 413-426.McCarthy, R., & Warrington, E. K. (1986). Phonological reading : Phenomena and paradoxes. Cortex, 22,359-380.McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes : An examination of systems of processesin cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287-330.McClelland, J. L., & Johnston, J. L. (1977). The role of familiar units in the perception of words and nonwords.Perception and Psychophysics, 22, 249-261.McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letterperception : Part I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.McClusker, L. X., Hillinger, M. L., & Bias, R. C. (1981). Phonological recoding and reading. PsychologicalBulletin, 88, 217-245.McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., Zola, D., & Jacobs, A. M. (1989). Eye movement controlduring reading : II. Frequency of refixating a word. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 245-253.McNamara, T. P. (1992). Priming and constraints it places on theories of memory and retrieval. Psycholog i -cal Review , 99, 650-662.McNamara, T. P. (1994). Theories of priming II : Types of primes. Journal of Experimental Psychology :Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 507-520.McQuade, D. V. (1981). Variable reliance on phonological information in visual word recognition. Languageand Speech, 24, 99-109.