192BibliographieKay, J., & Bishop, D. (1987). Anatomical differ<strong>en</strong>ces betwe<strong>en</strong> nose, palm, and hand, or, the body in question: Further dissection of the processes of sub-lexical spelling-to-sound translation. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Atte n tion and Performance XII : The psychology of reading (pp. 449-469). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.Kay, J., & Marcel, A. J. (1981). One process, not two, in reading words aloud : Lexical analogies do thework of non-lexical rules. Quarterly Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology, 33A, 397-413.Kelly M. H., Morris J., & Verrekia L. (1998). Orthographic cues to lexical stress : effects on naming andlexical decision. Memory and Cognition, 26, 822-832.Ker<strong>en</strong>, G., & Bag<strong>en</strong>, S. (1981). Recognition models of alphanumeric characters. Perception & Psychophysics,29, 234-246.Klapp, S. T., Anderson, W. G., & Berrian, R. W. (1973). Implicit speech in reading reconsidered. Journal ofExperim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology, 100, 368-374.Kleiman, G. M. (1975). Speech recoding in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14,323-339.Kolers, P. A. (1970). Three stages of reading. In H. Levin & J. P. Williams (Eds.), Basic studies on reading(pp. 134-146). New York : Basic Books.Krumhansl, C. L. (1978). Concerning the applicability of geometric models to similarity data : The interrelationshipbetwe<strong>en</strong> similarity and spatial d<strong>en</strong>sity. Psychological Review, 85, 445-463.Krumhansl, C. L. (1982). D<strong>en</strong>sity versus feature weights as predictors of visual id<strong>en</strong>tifications : Comm<strong>en</strong>t onAppelman and Mayzner. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : G<strong>en</strong>eral, 111, 101-108.Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of pres<strong>en</strong>t-day American English. Provid<strong>en</strong>ce,RI : Brown University Press.Laberge, D., & Samuel, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. CognitivePsychology 6, 293-323.Landauer, T. K. (1962). Rate of implicit speech. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 15, 646.Landauer, T. K., & Streeter, L. A. (1973). Structural differ<strong>en</strong>ces betwe<strong>en</strong> common and rare words : Failure ofequival<strong>en</strong>ce assumptions for theories of word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,12, 119-131.Lange, M. (1997). Spelling-sound regularities in polysyllabic English words and their effects on reading. Ms.Thesis : Cambridge University.Laxon, V. J., Coltheart, M., & Keating, C. (1988). Childr<strong>en</strong> find fri<strong>en</strong>dly words fri<strong>en</strong>dly too : Words withmany orthographic neighbors are easier to read and spell. British Journal of E<strong>du</strong>cational Psychology,58, 103-119.Laxon, V., Masterson, J., & Coltheart, V. (1991). Some bodies are easier to read : The effect of consist<strong>en</strong>cyand regularity on childr<strong>en</strong>'s reading. Quarterly Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology, 43A, 793-824.Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1964). Le geste et la parole - I - Technique et langage. Editions Albin Michel, Paris.Lévi-Strauss, C. (1955). Tristes tropiques. Editions Plon, Paris.Liberman, A. M., Ingram, F., Lisker, L., Delattre, P., & Cooper, F. S. (1959). Minimal rules for synthetizingspeech. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 31, 1490-1499.Luce, R. D. (1959). Indivi<strong>du</strong>al choice behavior. New York : Wiley.Luce, R. D. (1963). Detection and recognition. In R.D. Luce, R.R. Bush, & S.E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbookof mathematical psychology (Vol.1). New York : Wiley.Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times : Their role in inferring elem<strong>en</strong>tary m<strong>en</strong>tal organisation. New York :Oxford University Press.
Bibliographie 193Lukatela, G., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (1990). Phonemic, associative, and grammatical context effectswith id<strong>en</strong>tified and unid<strong>en</strong>tified primes. Language and Speech, 33, 1-18.Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1990a). Automatic and pre-lexical computation of phonology in visual wordid<strong>en</strong>tification. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 325-343.Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1990b). Phonemic similarity effects and prelexical phonology. Memory andCognition, 18, 128-152.Mandelblit, N., & Zachar, O. (1998). The notion of dynamic unit : Conceptual developm<strong>en</strong>ts in cognitivesci<strong>en</strong>ce. Cognitive Sci<strong>en</strong>ce, 22, 229-268.Manguel, A. (1998). Une histoire de la lecture. Editions Actes Sud.Marcel, A. J. (1980). Surface dyslexia and beginning reading : A revised hypothesis of the pronounciation ofprint and its impairm<strong>en</strong>ts. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, J.C. Marshall (Eds.), Deep dyslexia. London: Routeledge, and Chapman & Hall. (pp. 227-258)Marcel, A. J. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perception : Experim<strong>en</strong>ts on visual masking and wordrecognition. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 197-237.Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco : Freeman.Marshall, J. C., & Newcombe, F. (1973). Patterns of paralexia : A psycholinguistic approach. Journal ofPsycholinguistic Research, 2, 175-199.Martin, H.-J. (1988). Histoire et pouvoirs de l’écrit. Première édition : Librairie Académique Perrin. Editionau format de poche (1996) : Albin Michel, Paris.Martin, R. C. (1982). The pseudohomophone effect : The role of visual similarity in nonword decisions.Quarterly Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology, 34A, 395-409.Massaro, D. W., & Coh<strong>en</strong>, M. M. (1994). Visual, orthographic, phonological, and lexical influ<strong>en</strong>ces inreading. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1107-1128.Massaro, D., W., & Klitzke, D. (1979). The role of lateral masking and orthographic structure in letter andword recognition. Acta Psychologica, 43, 413-426.McCarthy, R., & Warrington, E. K. (1986). Phonological reading : Ph<strong>en</strong>om<strong>en</strong>a and paradoxes. Cortex, 22,359-380.McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of m<strong>en</strong>tal processes : An examination of systems of processesin cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287-330.McClelland, J. L., & Johnston, J. L. (1977). The role of familiar units in the perception of words and nonwords.Perception and Psychophysics, 22, 249-261.McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letterperception : Part I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.McClusker, L. X., Hillinger, M. L., & Bias, R. C. (1981). Phonological recoding and reading. PsychologicalBulletin, 88, 217-245.McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., Zola, D., & Jacobs, A. M. (1989). Eye movem<strong>en</strong>t control<strong>du</strong>ring reading : II. Frequ<strong>en</strong>cy of refixating a word. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 245-253.McNamara, T. P. (1992). Priming and constraints it places on theories of memory and retrieval. Psycholog i -cal Review , 99, 650-662.McNamara, T. P. (1994). Theories of priming II : Types of primes. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology :Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 507-520.McQuade, D. V. (1981). Variable reliance on phonological information in visual word recognition. Languageand Speech, 24, 99-109.
- Page 1:
UNIVERSITÉ DE PROVENCE, AIX-MARSEI
- Page 4 and 5:
Ce travail clôt un cycle de format
- Page 6 and 7:
CHAPITRE 7 : LE FUM . . . . . . . .
- Page 8 and 9:
8IntroductionPour cela, notre domai
- Page 10 and 11:
10Introduction• au niveau lexical
- Page 12 and 13:
12Introduction• sa forme visuelle
- Page 14 and 15:
14IntroductionAprès avoir posé le
- Page 16 and 17:
16Méthodologiespulations sur les i
- Page 18 and 19:
18Méthodologies2.1. Protocoles exp
- Page 20 and 21:
20Méthodologiessi le stimulus se t
- Page 22 and 23:
22MéthodologiesCertaines études t
- Page 24 and 25:
24Méthodologiestes, on obtient des
- Page 26 and 27:
26Méthodologies1996 ; Peter & Turv
- Page 28 and 29:
28Méthodologiesles performances da
- Page 30 and 31:
30Méthodologies6 %8%10%15%30%50%80
- Page 32 and 33:
32MéthodologiesMatériel expérime
- Page 34 and 35:
34Méthodologiesentraîne le masqua
- Page 36 and 37:
36MéthodologiesLe même résultat
- Page 38 and 39:
38Méthodologies120100Situation Sta
- Page 40 and 41:
Chapitre 3Orthographe et phonologie
- Page 42 and 43:
42Orthographe et Phonologie3.1. Var
- Page 44 and 45:
44Orthographe et PhonologieLa Figur
- Page 46 and 47:
46Orthographe et PhonologieJacobs,
- Page 48 and 49:
48Orthographe et Phonologiedans la
- Page 50 and 51:
50Orthographe et PhonologieDans l
- Page 52 and 53:
52Orthographe et Phonologieteurs du
- Page 54 and 55:
54Orthographe et PhonologieGoldstei
- Page 56 and 57:
56Orthographe et Phonologietion est
- Page 58 and 59:
58Orthographe et Phonologierand, 19
- Page 60 and 61:
60Orthographe et Phonologieplus ad
- Page 62 and 63:
62Orthographe et Phonologie3.2.3.1.
- Page 64 and 65:
64Orthographe et PhonologiePlus ré
- Page 66 and 67:
66Orthographe et PhonologieUne autr
- Page 68 and 69:
68Orthographe et Phonologiedeux var
- Page 70 and 71:
Chapitre 4Modèles de la perception
- Page 72 and 73:
72Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 74 and 75:
74Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 76 and 77:
76Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 78 and 79:
78Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 80 and 81:
80Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 82 and 83:
82Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 84 and 85:
84Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 86 and 87:
86Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 88 and 89:
88Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 90 and 91:
90Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 92 and 93:
92Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 94 and 95:
94Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 96 and 97:
96Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 98 and 99:
98MROM-pspécifier leur lien avec l
- Page 100 and 101:
100MROM-pphonèmes reliés par un r
- Page 102 and 103:
102MROM-pLorsque le modèle génèr
- Page 104 and 105:
104MROM-pque ce système artificiel
- Page 106 and 107:
106Unités de la lecturelinguistiqu
- Page 108 and 109:
108Unités de la lecture22606TR (ms
- Page 110 and 111:
110Unités de la lecturemes. Aussi
- Page 112 and 113:
112Unités de la lecturephonologiqu
- Page 114 and 115:
114Unités de la lectureelle-même
- Page 116 and 117:
116Unités de la lecture6.3. Expér
- Page 118 and 119:
118Unités de la lectureRead est qu
- Page 120 and 121:
120Unités de la lectureces modèle
- Page 122 and 123:
122Unités de la lecturechapitre su
- Page 124 and 125:
124FUMmultiples existant au sein de
- Page 126 and 127:
126FUMpar Berndt, Lynne D'Autrechy
- Page 128 and 129:
128FUMcessus de compétition et du
- Page 130 and 131:
130FUMgène et suit les principes c
- Page 132 and 133:
132FUMPseudohomophonesContrôles Or
- Page 134 and 135:
134FUM61023TR (ms) Seidenberg et al
- Page 136 and 137:
136FUMportementaux et les résultat
- Page 138 and 139:
138FUMà une entité extérieure au
- Page 140 and 141:
Chapitre 8Des prédictionsau niveau
- Page 142 and 143: 142Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 144 and 145: 144Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 146 and 147: 146Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 148 and 149: 148Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 150 and 151: 150Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 152 and 153: 152Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 154 and 155: 154Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 156 and 157: 156Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 158 and 159: 158Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 160 and 161: 160Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 162 and 163: 162Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 164 and 165: 164Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 166 and 167: 166Les mots polysyllabiquesmots mon
- Page 168 and 169: 168Les mots polysyllabiquesTableau
- Page 170 and 171: 170Les mots polysyllabiques9.2. Exp
- Page 172 and 173: 172Les mots polysyllabiques19001890
- Page 174 and 175: 174Les mots polysyllabiquesnexe XI
- Page 176 and 177: 176Les mots polysyllabiques9.4. Dis
- Page 178 and 179: 178ConclusionConclusion« La grande
- Page 180 and 181: 180Conclusionplutôt un système o
- Page 182 and 183: 182Conclusiontester les prédiction
- Page 184 and 185: 184BibliographieAderman, D., & Smit
- Page 186 and 187: 186BibliographieBrysbaert, M., Vitu
- Page 188 and 189: 188BibliographieFerrand, L., Segui,
- Page 190 and 191: 190BibliographieGrainger, J., & Jac
- Page 194 and 195: 194BibliographieMewhort, D. J. K.,
- Page 196 and 197: 196BibliographiePerea, M., & Pollat
- Page 198 and 199: 198BibliographieSeidenberg, M. S.,
- Page 200 and 201: 200BibliographieTreiman, R., & Zuko
- Page 202 and 203: 202AnnexesAnnexes
- Page 204 and 205: 204AnnexesAnnexe II : Temps de rép
- Page 206 and 207: 206AnnexesAnnexe IV : Temps de rép
- Page 208 and 209: 208Annexesd t 88 3 fixed fI%tdd d 3
- Page 210 and 211: 210Annexesoo u 3395 57 too tuoo $ 5
- Page 212 and 213: 212AnnexesAnnexe VI : Liste des 120
- Page 214 and 215: 214AnnexesAnnexe VII : Détail des
- Page 216 and 217: 216AnnexesSujets Stim. Erreur Sujet
- Page 218 and 219: 218AnnexesSujet Moyenne % Err ES Su
- Page 220 and 221: 220AnnexesAnnexe X : Stimuli employ
- Page 222 and 223: 222AnnexesAnnexe XI : Stimuli emplo
- Page 224 and 225: 224Appendice IMROM-P : An interacti
- Page 226 and 227: 226Appendice Ilanguages (French, Ge
- Page 228 and 229: 228Appendice Isummed frequency of f
- Page 230 and 231: 230Appendice IClearly, the ability
- Page 232 and 233: 232Appendice Ito an orthographic le
- Page 234 and 235: 234Appendice IFigure 6 gives an ill
- Page 236 and 237: 236Appendice Iestimator set study,
- Page 238 and 239: 238Appendice ISTEP 3. CRITERION SET
- Page 240 and 241: 240Appendice Iteractive processes o
- Page 242 and 243:
242Appendice INotwithstanding, a no
- Page 244 and 245:
244Appendice I1994). Our stratagem
- Page 246 and 247:
246Appendice ILass, U. (1995). Einf
- Page 248 and 249:
248Appendice IAPPENDIXA1. Cleaning
- Page 250 and 251:
250Appendice IIA phoneme effect in
- Page 252 and 253:
252Appendice IIAs shown in Table 1,
- Page 254 and 255:
254Appendice IImay depend on their
- Page 256 and 257:
Appendice III
- Page 258 and 259:
258Appendice IIIHowever, an unsolve
- Page 260 and 261:
260Appendice IIIgrapheme compared t
- Page 262 and 263:
262Appendice IIIRead, J. D. (1983).
- Page 264:
264Appendice IIIAppendix AMean resp