effet du nombre des graphèmes en Anglais - Aix Marseille Université

192BibliographieKay, J., & Bishop, D. (1987). Anatomical differences between nose, palm, and hand, or, the body in question: Further dissection of the processes of sub-lexical spelling-to-sound translation. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Atte n tion and Performance XII : The psychology of reading (pp. 449-469). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.Kay, J., & Marcel, A. J. (1981). One process, not two, in reading words aloud : Lexical analogies do thework of non-lexical rules. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 397-413.Kelly M. H., Morris J., & Verrekia L. (1998). Orthographic cues to lexical stress : effects on naming andlexical decision. Memory and Cognition, 26, 822-832.Keren, G., & Bagen, S. (1981). Recognition models of alphanumeric characters. Perception & Psychophysics,29, 234-246.Klapp, S. T., Anderson, W. G., & Berrian, R. W. (1973). Implicit speech in reading reconsidered. Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 100, 368-374.Kleiman, G. M. (1975). Speech recoding in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14,323-339.Kolers, P. A. (1970). Three stages of reading. In H. Levin & J. P. Williams (Eds.), Basic studies on reading(pp. 134-146). New York : Basic Books.Krumhansl, C. L. (1978). Concerning the applicability of geometric models to similarity data : The interrelationshipbetween similarity and spatial density. Psychological Review, 85, 445-463.Krumhansl, C. L. (1982). Density versus feature weights as predictors of visual identifications : Comment onAppelman and Mayzner. Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 111, 101-108.Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence,RI : Brown University Press.Laberge, D., & Samuel, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. CognitivePsychology 6, 293-323.Landauer, T. K. (1962). Rate of implicit speech. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 15, 646.Landauer, T. K., & Streeter, L. A. (1973). Structural differences between common and rare words : Failure ofequivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,12, 119-131.Lange, M. (1997). Spelling-sound regularities in polysyllabic English words and their effects on reading. Ms.Thesis : Cambridge University.Laxon, V. J., Coltheart, M., & Keating, C. (1988). Children find friendly words friendly too : Words withmany orthographic neighbors are easier to read and spell. British Journal of Educational Psychology,58, 103-119.Laxon, V., Masterson, J., & Coltheart, V. (1991). Some bodies are easier to read : The effect of consistencyand regularity on children's reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 793-824.Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1964). Le geste et la parole - I - Technique et langage. Editions Albin Michel, Paris.Lévi-Strauss, C. (1955). Tristes tropiques. Editions Plon, Paris.Liberman, A. M., Ingram, F., Lisker, L., Delattre, P., & Cooper, F. S. (1959). Minimal rules for synthetizingspeech. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 31, 1490-1499.Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior. New York : Wiley.Luce, R. D. (1963). Detection and recognition. In R.D. Luce, R.R. Bush, & S.E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbookof mathematical psychology (Vol.1). New York : Wiley.Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times : Their role in inferring elementary mental organisation. New York :Oxford University Press.