effet du nombre des graphèmes en Anglais - Aix Marseille Université

190BibliographieGrainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition : A multiple readoutmodel. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. (1998). On localist connectionism and psychological science. In Grainger, J. &Jacobs, A. M. (Eds.) Symbolic connectionist approaches to human cognition. Hillsdale, NJ : LawrenceErlbaum Associates, pp. 1-38.Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (sous presse). Temporal integration of information in orthographic priming.Visual Cognition.Grainger, J., O'Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M. & Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units invisual word recognition : The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 189-195.Grainger, J., O'Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., & Segui, J. (1992). Neighborhood frequency effects and lettervisibility in visual word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 49-56.Grainger, J., & Segui, J. (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition : A comparisonof lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 191-198.Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York : Wiley.Grice, G. R. (1968). Stimulus intensity and response evocation. Psychological Review, 75, 359-373.Grice, G. R., Nullmeyer, R., & Spiker, V. A. (1982). Human reaction time : Toward a general theory. Journalof Experimental Psychology : General, 111, 135-153.Haber, R., N., & Hershenson, M. (1965). Effect of repeated brief exposures on the growth of a percept. Journalof Experimental Psychology, 69, 40-46.Hanna, P. R., Hanna, J. S., Hodges, R. E., Ruderf, E. H. (1966). Phoneme-grapheme correspondances ascues to spelling improvement. Washington, DC : US Government Printing Office.Hansen, D., & Rodgers, T. S. (1965). An exploration of psycholinguistic units in initial reading. In Proceedingsof the Symposium on the Psycholinguistic Nature of the Reading Process. Detroit : Wayne StateUniversity.Healy, A.F. (1994). Letter detection : A window to unitization and other cognitive processes. PsychonomicBulletin & Review, 1, 333-344.Heathcote, A., Popiel, S. J., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (1991). Analysis of response time distributions : Anexample using the stroop task. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 340-347.van der Heijden, A. H. C., Malhas, M. S. M., & van der Roovaart, B. P. (1984). An empirical interletterconfusion matrix for continuous-line capitals. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 85-88.Henderson, L. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London : Academic Press.Henderson, L. (1985). On the use of the term "grapheme". Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 135-148.Hockley, W. E. (1984). Analysis of response time distributions in the study of cognitive processes. Journalof Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory and Cognition, 6, 598-615.Howard, D., Patterson, K., Wise, R., Brown, D. W., Friston, K., Weiller, C., Frackowiak, R. (1992). Thecortical localization of the lexicons. Brain, 115, 1769-1782.Howes, D. H., & Solomon, R. L. (1951). Visual duration thresholds as a function of word probability.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 401-410.Hudson, P. T. W., & Bergman, M. W. (1985). Lexical knowledge in word recognition : Word length andword frequency in naming and lexical decision tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 46-58.Huey, E. B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. NewYork : Macmillan Press.Humphreys, G. W., & Evett, L. J. (1985). Are there independent lexical and nonlexical routes in word processing?An evaluation of the dual-route theory of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 689-740.