188BibliographieFerrand, L., Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1996). Masked priming of word and picture naming : The role of syllabicunits. Journal of Memory and Language.Ferrand, L., Segui, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1996). The syllable's role in word naming. Memory & Cognition,in press.Feustel, T. L., Shiffrin, R. M., & Salasoo, A. (1983). Episodic and lexical contributions to the repetitioneffect in word id<strong>en</strong>tification. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : G<strong>en</strong>eral, 112, 309-346.Février, J. G. (1995). Histoire de l’écriture. Paris : Payot.Fisher, D. F., Monty, R. A., & Glucksberg, S. (1969). Visual confusion matrices : Fact or artifact ? Journalof Psychology, 71, 111-125.Forster, K. I. (1976). Accessing the m<strong>en</strong>tal lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. W. Walker (Eds.), New approachesto language mechanisms. Amsterdam : North-Holland, pp. 257-287.Forster, K. I. (1987). Form priming with masked primes : The best match hypothesis. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Att<strong>en</strong>tion and Performance XII : The psychology of reading (pp. 127-146). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning andVerbal Behavior, 12, 627-635.Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequ<strong>en</strong>cy att<strong>en</strong>uation in lexical access. Journal ofExperim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Learning Memory and Cognition, 10, 680-698.Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1991). The d<strong>en</strong>sity constraint on form-priming in the naming task : Interfer<strong>en</strong>ceeffects from a masked prime. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 1-25.Forster, K. I., & Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically relatedforms : Repetition or partial activation ? Quarterly Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology, 39A,211-251.Forster, K., I., & Sh<strong>en</strong>, D. J. (1996). No <strong>en</strong>emies in the neighborhood : abs<strong>en</strong>ce of inhibitory neighborhoodeffects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : LearningMemory and Cognition, 22, 696-713.Fowler, C., Napps, S. E., & Feldman, L. (1985). Relations among regular and irregular morphologicallyrelated words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory & Cognition, 13, 241-255.Fraisse, P., & Piaget, J. (1981). Traité de psychologie expérim<strong>en</strong>tale. Paris : Presses Universitaires deFrance.Frau<strong>en</strong>felder, U. H., Baay<strong>en</strong>, R. H., Hellwig, F. M., & Schreuder, R. (1993). Neighborhood d<strong>en</strong>sity andfrequ<strong>en</strong>cy across languages and modalities. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 781-804.Frederiks<strong>en</strong>, J. R., & Kroll, J. F. (1976). Spelling and sound : Approaches to the internal lexicon. Journal ofExperim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 2, 361-379.Frost, R. (1994). Prelexical and postlexical strategies in reading : Evid<strong>en</strong>ce from a deep and a shallow orthography.Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 398-408.Frost, R. (1998). toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition : True issues and falsetrails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71-99.Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? Amasked-priming investigation of morphological repres<strong>en</strong>tation. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psycholology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 23, 829-56.Frost, R., Katz, L., & B<strong>en</strong>tin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word comparison and orthographic depth : Amultilingual comparison. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Human Perception and Performance,13, 104-115.Fudge, E. C. (1969). Syllables. Journal of Linguistics, 5, 253-286.
Bibliographie 189Funnel, E. (1983). Phonological processes in reading : New evid<strong>en</strong>ce from acquired dyslexia. British Journalof Psychology, 74, 159-180.Gatuso, B., Smith, L. B., & Treiman, R. (1991). Classifying by dim<strong>en</strong>sions and reading : A comparison ofthe auditory and visual modalities. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Child Psychology, 51, 139-169.Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsist<strong>en</strong>t interactions betwe<strong>en</strong> lexical familiarity andorthography, concret<strong>en</strong>ess, and polysemy. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : G<strong>en</strong>eral, 113, 256-281.Geyer, L. H (1977). Recognition and confusion of lowercase alphabet. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 487-490.Gibson, E. J. (1965). Learning to read. Sci<strong>en</strong>ce, 148, 1066-1072.Gibson, E. J., Pick, A. D., Osser, H., & Hammond, M., 1962. The role of grapheme-phoneme correspond<strong>en</strong>cein the perception of words. American Journal of Psychology 75, 554-570.Gilmore, G. C., Hersh, H., Caramazza, A., & Griffin, J. (1979). Multidim<strong>en</strong>sional letter similarity derivedfrom recognition errors. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 425-431.Glanzer, M., & Ehr<strong>en</strong>reich, S. L. (1979). Structure and search of the internal lexicon. Journal of VerbalLearning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 381-398.Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journalof Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674-691.Goldsmith, J. (1976). An overview of autosegm<strong>en</strong>tal phonology. Linguistic Analysis, 2, 23-68.Goldsmith, J. (1990). Autosegm<strong>en</strong>tal an metrical phonology. Oxford, England : Basil Blackwell.Goodman, K. S. (1969). Analysis of reading miscues : Applied psycholinguistics. Reading Research Quarterly,5, 9-30.Gordon, B. (1983). Lexical access and lexical decision : Mechanisms of frequ<strong>en</strong>cy s<strong>en</strong>sitivity. Journal ofVerbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 24-44.Gordon, B. (1985). Subjective frequ<strong>en</strong>cy and the lexical decision lat<strong>en</strong>cy function : Implications for mechanismsof lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 631-654.Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. In J. P. Kavanagh & I. G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by eyeand by ear (pp. 331-358). Cambridge, MA : M.I.T. Press.Gough, P. B., & Cosky, M. J. (1977). One second of reading again. In N. J. Castellan, D. B. Pisoni, & G.R. Potts (Eds.), Cognitive theory (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawr<strong>en</strong>ce Erlbaum.Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequ<strong>en</strong>cy and neighborhood frequ<strong>en</strong>cy effects in lexical decision and naming. Journalof Memory & Language, 29, 228-244.Grainger, J., Colé, P., & Segui, J. (1991). Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journalof Memory and Language, 30, 370-384.Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition : Effects ofmasked homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 218-233.Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1996). Masked orthographic and phonological priming in visual word recognitionand naming : Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Memory and Language.Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1993). Masked partial-word priming in visual word recognition : Effect ofpositional letter frequ<strong>en</strong>cy. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Human Perception and Performance,19, 951-964.Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1994). A <strong>du</strong>al-read out model of word context effects in letter perception :Further investigations of the word superiority effect. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : HumanPerception and Performance, 20, 1158-1176.
- Page 1:
UNIVERSITÉ DE PROVENCE, AIX-MARSEI
- Page 4 and 5:
Ce travail clôt un cycle de format
- Page 6 and 7:
CHAPITRE 7 : LE FUM . . . . . . . .
- Page 8 and 9:
8IntroductionPour cela, notre domai
- Page 10 and 11:
10Introduction• au niveau lexical
- Page 12 and 13:
12Introduction• sa forme visuelle
- Page 14 and 15:
14IntroductionAprès avoir posé le
- Page 16 and 17:
16Méthodologiespulations sur les i
- Page 18 and 19:
18Méthodologies2.1. Protocoles exp
- Page 20 and 21:
20Méthodologiessi le stimulus se t
- Page 22 and 23:
22MéthodologiesCertaines études t
- Page 24 and 25:
24Méthodologiestes, on obtient des
- Page 26 and 27:
26Méthodologies1996 ; Peter & Turv
- Page 28 and 29:
28Méthodologiesles performances da
- Page 30 and 31:
30Méthodologies6 %8%10%15%30%50%80
- Page 32 and 33:
32MéthodologiesMatériel expérime
- Page 34 and 35:
34Méthodologiesentraîne le masqua
- Page 36 and 37:
36MéthodologiesLe même résultat
- Page 38 and 39:
38Méthodologies120100Situation Sta
- Page 40 and 41:
Chapitre 3Orthographe et phonologie
- Page 42 and 43:
42Orthographe et Phonologie3.1. Var
- Page 44 and 45:
44Orthographe et PhonologieLa Figur
- Page 46 and 47:
46Orthographe et PhonologieJacobs,
- Page 48 and 49:
48Orthographe et Phonologiedans la
- Page 50 and 51:
50Orthographe et PhonologieDans l
- Page 52 and 53:
52Orthographe et Phonologieteurs du
- Page 54 and 55:
54Orthographe et PhonologieGoldstei
- Page 56 and 57:
56Orthographe et Phonologietion est
- Page 58 and 59:
58Orthographe et Phonologierand, 19
- Page 60 and 61:
60Orthographe et Phonologieplus ad
- Page 62 and 63:
62Orthographe et Phonologie3.2.3.1.
- Page 64 and 65:
64Orthographe et PhonologiePlus ré
- Page 66 and 67:
66Orthographe et PhonologieUne autr
- Page 68 and 69:
68Orthographe et Phonologiedeux var
- Page 70 and 71:
Chapitre 4Modèles de la perception
- Page 72 and 73:
72Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 74 and 75:
74Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 76 and 77:
76Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 78 and 79:
78Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 80 and 81:
80Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 82 and 83:
82Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 84 and 85:
84Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 86 and 87:
86Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 88 and 89:
88Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 90 and 91:
90Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 92 and 93:
92Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 94 and 95:
94Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 96 and 97:
96Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 98 and 99:
98MROM-pspécifier leur lien avec l
- Page 100 and 101:
100MROM-pphonèmes reliés par un r
- Page 102 and 103:
102MROM-pLorsque le modèle génèr
- Page 104 and 105:
104MROM-pque ce système artificiel
- Page 106 and 107:
106Unités de la lecturelinguistiqu
- Page 108 and 109:
108Unités de la lecture22606TR (ms
- Page 110 and 111:
110Unités de la lecturemes. Aussi
- Page 112 and 113:
112Unités de la lecturephonologiqu
- Page 114 and 115:
114Unités de la lectureelle-même
- Page 116 and 117:
116Unités de la lecture6.3. Expér
- Page 118 and 119:
118Unités de la lectureRead est qu
- Page 120 and 121:
120Unités de la lectureces modèle
- Page 122 and 123:
122Unités de la lecturechapitre su
- Page 124 and 125:
124FUMmultiples existant au sein de
- Page 126 and 127:
126FUMpar Berndt, Lynne D'Autrechy
- Page 128 and 129:
128FUMcessus de compétition et du
- Page 130 and 131:
130FUMgène et suit les principes c
- Page 132 and 133:
132FUMPseudohomophonesContrôles Or
- Page 134 and 135:
134FUM61023TR (ms) Seidenberg et al
- Page 136 and 137:
136FUMportementaux et les résultat
- Page 138 and 139: 138FUMà une entité extérieure au
- Page 140 and 141: Chapitre 8Des prédictionsau niveau
- Page 142 and 143: 142Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 144 and 145: 144Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 146 and 147: 146Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 148 and 149: 148Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 150 and 151: 150Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 152 and 153: 152Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 154 and 155: 154Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 156 and 157: 156Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 158 and 159: 158Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 160 and 161: 160Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 162 and 163: 162Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 164 and 165: 164Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 166 and 167: 166Les mots polysyllabiquesmots mon
- Page 168 and 169: 168Les mots polysyllabiquesTableau
- Page 170 and 171: 170Les mots polysyllabiques9.2. Exp
- Page 172 and 173: 172Les mots polysyllabiques19001890
- Page 174 and 175: 174Les mots polysyllabiquesnexe XI
- Page 176 and 177: 176Les mots polysyllabiques9.4. Dis
- Page 178 and 179: 178ConclusionConclusion« La grande
- Page 180 and 181: 180Conclusionplutôt un système o
- Page 182 and 183: 182Conclusiontester les prédiction
- Page 184 and 185: 184BibliographieAderman, D., & Smit
- Page 186 and 187: 186BibliographieBrysbaert, M., Vitu
- Page 190 and 191: 190BibliographieGrainger, J., & Jac
- Page 192 and 193: 192BibliographieKay, J., & Bishop,
- Page 194 and 195: 194BibliographieMewhort, D. J. K.,
- Page 196 and 197: 196BibliographiePerea, M., & Pollat
- Page 198 and 199: 198BibliographieSeidenberg, M. S.,
- Page 200 and 201: 200BibliographieTreiman, R., & Zuko
- Page 202 and 203: 202AnnexesAnnexes
- Page 204 and 205: 204AnnexesAnnexe II : Temps de rép
- Page 206 and 207: 206AnnexesAnnexe IV : Temps de rép
- Page 208 and 209: 208Annexesd t 88 3 fixed fI%tdd d 3
- Page 210 and 211: 210Annexesoo u 3395 57 too tuoo $ 5
- Page 212 and 213: 212AnnexesAnnexe VI : Liste des 120
- Page 214 and 215: 214AnnexesAnnexe VII : Détail des
- Page 216 and 217: 216AnnexesSujets Stim. Erreur Sujet
- Page 218 and 219: 218AnnexesSujet Moyenne % Err ES Su
- Page 220 and 221: 220AnnexesAnnexe X : Stimuli employ
- Page 222 and 223: 222AnnexesAnnexe XI : Stimuli emplo
- Page 224 and 225: 224Appendice IMROM-P : An interacti
- Page 226 and 227: 226Appendice Ilanguages (French, Ge
- Page 228 and 229: 228Appendice Isummed frequency of f
- Page 230 and 231: 230Appendice IClearly, the ability
- Page 232 and 233: 232Appendice Ito an orthographic le
- Page 234 and 235: 234Appendice IFigure 6 gives an ill
- Page 236 and 237: 236Appendice Iestimator set study,
- Page 238 and 239:
238Appendice ISTEP 3. CRITERION SET
- Page 240 and 241:
240Appendice Iteractive processes o
- Page 242 and 243:
242Appendice INotwithstanding, a no
- Page 244 and 245:
244Appendice I1994). Our stratagem
- Page 246 and 247:
246Appendice ILass, U. (1995). Einf
- Page 248 and 249:
248Appendice IAPPENDIXA1. Cleaning
- Page 250 and 251:
250Appendice IIA phoneme effect in
- Page 252 and 253:
252Appendice IIAs shown in Table 1,
- Page 254 and 255:
254Appendice IImay depend on their
- Page 256 and 257:
Appendice III
- Page 258 and 259:
258Appendice IIIHowever, an unsolve
- Page 260 and 261:
260Appendice IIIgrapheme compared t
- Page 262 and 263:
262Appendice IIIRead, J. D. (1983).
- Page 264:
264Appendice IIIAppendix AMean resp