184BibliographieAderman, D., & Smith, E. E. (1971). Expectancy as a determinant of functional units in perceptual recognition.Cognitive Psychology, 2, 117-129.Aghababian, V. (1998). Acquisition de la lecture : Aspects développem<strong>en</strong>taux et neuropsychologiques. Thèsede Doctorat de l’Université de Prov<strong>en</strong>ce.Aghababian, V., & Nazir, T. (soumis). Developping normal reading skills : Visual aspects.Andrews, S. (1982). Phonological recoding : Is the regularity effect consist<strong>en</strong>t? Memory and Cognition, 10,565-575.Andrews, S. (1989). Frequ<strong>en</strong>cy and neighborhood size effects on lexical access : Activation or search? Journalof Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 802-814.Andrews, S. (1992). Frequ<strong>en</strong>cy and neighborhood effects on lexical access : Lexical similarity or orthographicre<strong>du</strong>ndancy? Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 234-254.Antis, S. M. (1974). A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. Vision Research, 14,589-592.Appelman, I. B., & Mayzner, M.S. (1982). Application of geometric models to letter recognition : Distanceand d<strong>en</strong>sity. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : G<strong>en</strong>eral, 111, 60-100.Atkinson, R. C., & Juola, J. F. (1973). Factors influ<strong>en</strong>cing speed and accuracy of word recognition. In S.Kornblum (Ed.), Att<strong>en</strong>tion and Performance IV. New York : Academic Press, pp. 583-612.Baay<strong>en</strong>, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch : Evid<strong>en</strong>ce for a parallel<strong>du</strong>al-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94-117.Baay<strong>en</strong>, R. H., Piep<strong>en</strong>brock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). LinguisticData Consortium, University of P<strong>en</strong>nsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.Babin, J. P. (1996). Derivational morphology and lexical access : prefixed and pseudo-prefixed verbs. CanadianJournal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psycholology, 50, 371-385.Bachelard, G. (1927). Essai sur la connaissance approchée. Paris : Editions Vrin.Backman, J., Bruck, M., Hébert, M., & Seid<strong>en</strong>berg, M. S. (1984). Acquisition and use of spelling-soundinformation in reading. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Child Psychology, 38, 114-133.Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access ? The role ofword frequ<strong>en</strong>cy in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Human Perceptionand Performance, 10, 340-357.Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequ<strong>en</strong>cy effects in the prononciation task :Lexical access and/or pro<strong>du</strong>ction frequ<strong>en</strong>cy ? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 24, 89-106.Baron, J. (1973). Phonemic stage not necessary for reading. Quarterly Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology,25, 241-246.Baron, J., & Strawson, C. (1976). Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud.Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 2, 386-393.Baron, J., & Thurston, C. (1973). An analysis of the word superiority effect. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 207-228.Beauvois, M. F., & Derouesne, J. (1979). Phonological dyslexia : Thre dissociations. Journal of Neurology,Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 42, 1115-1124.Becker, C. A. (1976). Allocation of att<strong>en</strong>tion <strong>du</strong>ring visual word recognition. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 556-566.Becker, C. A. (1980). Semantic context effect in visual word recognition : An analysis of semantic strategies.Memory & Cognition, 8, 493-512.
Bibliographie 185Ber<strong>en</strong>t, I. (1997). Phonological priming in the lexical decision task : regularity effects are not necessary evid<strong>en</strong>cefor assembly. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Human Perception & Performance, 23,1727-1742.Ber<strong>en</strong>t, I., & Perfetti, C. A. (1995). A rose is a reez : The two-cycles model of phonology assembly in readingEnglish. Psychological Review, 102, 146-184.Ber<strong>en</strong>t, I., & Shimron, J. (1997). The repres<strong>en</strong>tation of Hebrew words : evid<strong>en</strong>ce from the obligatory contourprinciple. Cognition, 64, 39-72.Berndt, R. S., Lynne D’Autrechy, C., & Reggia, J. A. (1994). Functional pronunciation units in Englishwords. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 977-991.Berndt, R., Reggia, J., & Mitchum, C. (1987). Empirically-derived probabilities for grapheme-to-phonemecorrespond<strong>en</strong>ces in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instrum<strong>en</strong>ts and Computers, 19, 1-19.Besner, D., Davelaar, E., Alcott, D., & Parry, P. (1984). Wholistic reading of alphabetic print : Evid<strong>en</strong>cefrom the FDM and the FBI. In L. H<strong>en</strong>derson (Ed.), Orthographies and reading : Perspectives from cognitivepsychology, neuropsychology, and linguistics (pp. 121-135). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.Besner, D., D<strong>en</strong>nis, I., & Davelaar, E. (1985). Reading without phonology ? Quarterly Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>talPsychology, 39A, 85-94.Besner, D., Twilley, L., McCann, R. S., & Seergobin, K. (1990). On the connection betwe<strong>en</strong> connectionismand data : Are a few words necessary? Psychological Review, 97, 432-446.Biederman, G. B. (1966). The recognition of tachistoscopically pres<strong>en</strong>ted five-letter words as a function ofdigram frequ<strong>en</strong>cy. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 208-209.Bosman, A., M., & de Groot, A. M. (1996). Phonologic mediation is fundam<strong>en</strong>tal to reading : evid<strong>en</strong>ce frombeginning readers. Quarterly Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psycholology, A, 49, 715-744.Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177-178.Bouma, H. (1971). Visual recognition of isolated lower-case letters. Vision Research, 11, 459-474.Bouma, H. (1973). Visual interfer<strong>en</strong>ce in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. VisionResearch, 13, 767-782.Bouma, H., & Legein, Ch. P. (1977). Foveal and parafoveal recognition of letters and words by dyslexics andby average readers. Neuropsychologia, 15, 69-80.Bov<strong>en</strong>s, N., & Brysbaert, M. (1990). IBM PC/XT AT and PS/2 Turbo Pascal timing with ext<strong>en</strong>ded resolution.Behavior Research Methods, Instrum<strong>en</strong>ts, & Computers, 22, 332-334.Bower, T. G. R. (1970). Reading by eye. In H. Levin & J. P. Williams (Eds.), Basic studies on reading (pp.134-146). New York : Basic Books.Bowey, J. A., 1990. Orthographic onsets and rimes as functional units of reading. Memory and Cognition18, 419-427.Bowey, J. A., 1993. Orthographic rime priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology 46A,247-271.Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1978). Difficulties in auditory organization as a possible cause of reading backwards.Nature, 271, 746-747.Broadb<strong>en</strong>t, D. E., & Gregory, G. M. (1968). Visual perception of words differing in letter digram frequ<strong>en</strong>cy.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 569-571.Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1986). Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 219-252.Brown, G. D. A. (1987). Resolving inconsist<strong>en</strong>cy : A computational model of word naming. Journal ofMemory and Language, 26, 1-23.
- Page 1:
UNIVERSITÉ DE PROVENCE, AIX-MARSEI
- Page 4 and 5:
Ce travail clôt un cycle de format
- Page 6 and 7:
CHAPITRE 7 : LE FUM . . . . . . . .
- Page 8 and 9:
8IntroductionPour cela, notre domai
- Page 10 and 11:
10Introduction• au niveau lexical
- Page 12 and 13:
12Introduction• sa forme visuelle
- Page 14 and 15:
14IntroductionAprès avoir posé le
- Page 16 and 17:
16Méthodologiespulations sur les i
- Page 18 and 19:
18Méthodologies2.1. Protocoles exp
- Page 20 and 21:
20Méthodologiessi le stimulus se t
- Page 22 and 23:
22MéthodologiesCertaines études t
- Page 24 and 25:
24Méthodologiestes, on obtient des
- Page 26 and 27:
26Méthodologies1996 ; Peter & Turv
- Page 28 and 29:
28Méthodologiesles performances da
- Page 30 and 31:
30Méthodologies6 %8%10%15%30%50%80
- Page 32 and 33:
32MéthodologiesMatériel expérime
- Page 34 and 35:
34Méthodologiesentraîne le masqua
- Page 36 and 37:
36MéthodologiesLe même résultat
- Page 38 and 39:
38Méthodologies120100Situation Sta
- Page 40 and 41:
Chapitre 3Orthographe et phonologie
- Page 42 and 43:
42Orthographe et Phonologie3.1. Var
- Page 44 and 45:
44Orthographe et PhonologieLa Figur
- Page 46 and 47:
46Orthographe et PhonologieJacobs,
- Page 48 and 49:
48Orthographe et Phonologiedans la
- Page 50 and 51:
50Orthographe et PhonologieDans l
- Page 52 and 53:
52Orthographe et Phonologieteurs du
- Page 54 and 55:
54Orthographe et PhonologieGoldstei
- Page 56 and 57:
56Orthographe et Phonologietion est
- Page 58 and 59:
58Orthographe et Phonologierand, 19
- Page 60 and 61:
60Orthographe et Phonologieplus ad
- Page 62 and 63:
62Orthographe et Phonologie3.2.3.1.
- Page 64 and 65:
64Orthographe et PhonologiePlus ré
- Page 66 and 67:
66Orthographe et PhonologieUne autr
- Page 68 and 69:
68Orthographe et Phonologiedeux var
- Page 70 and 71:
Chapitre 4Modèles de la perception
- Page 72 and 73:
72Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 74 and 75:
74Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 76 and 77:
76Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 78 and 79:
78Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 80 and 81:
80Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 82 and 83:
82Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 84 and 85:
84Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 86 and 87:
86Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 88 and 89:
88Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 90 and 91:
90Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 92 and 93:
92Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 94 and 95:
94Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 96 and 97:
96Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 98 and 99:
98MROM-pspécifier leur lien avec l
- Page 100 and 101:
100MROM-pphonèmes reliés par un r
- Page 102 and 103:
102MROM-pLorsque le modèle génèr
- Page 104 and 105:
104MROM-pque ce système artificiel
- Page 106 and 107:
106Unités de la lecturelinguistiqu
- Page 108 and 109:
108Unités de la lecture22606TR (ms
- Page 110 and 111:
110Unités de la lecturemes. Aussi
- Page 112 and 113:
112Unités de la lecturephonologiqu
- Page 114 and 115:
114Unités de la lectureelle-même
- Page 116 and 117:
116Unités de la lecture6.3. Expér
- Page 118 and 119:
118Unités de la lectureRead est qu
- Page 120 and 121:
120Unités de la lectureces modèle
- Page 122 and 123:
122Unités de la lecturechapitre su
- Page 124 and 125:
124FUMmultiples existant au sein de
- Page 126 and 127:
126FUMpar Berndt, Lynne D'Autrechy
- Page 128 and 129:
128FUMcessus de compétition et du
- Page 130 and 131:
130FUMgène et suit les principes c
- Page 132 and 133:
132FUMPseudohomophonesContrôles Or
- Page 134 and 135: 134FUM61023TR (ms) Seidenberg et al
- Page 136 and 137: 136FUMportementaux et les résultat
- Page 138 and 139: 138FUMà une entité extérieure au
- Page 140 and 141: Chapitre 8Des prédictionsau niveau
- Page 142 and 143: 142Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 144 and 145: 144Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 146 and 147: 146Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 148 and 149: 148Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 150 and 151: 150Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 152 and 153: 152Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 154 and 155: 154Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 156 and 157: 156Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 158 and 159: 158Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 160 and 161: 160Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 162 and 163: 162Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 164 and 165: 164Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 166 and 167: 166Les mots polysyllabiquesmots mon
- Page 168 and 169: 168Les mots polysyllabiquesTableau
- Page 170 and 171: 170Les mots polysyllabiques9.2. Exp
- Page 172 and 173: 172Les mots polysyllabiques19001890
- Page 174 and 175: 174Les mots polysyllabiquesnexe XI
- Page 176 and 177: 176Les mots polysyllabiques9.4. Dis
- Page 178 and 179: 178ConclusionConclusion« La grande
- Page 180 and 181: 180Conclusionplutôt un système o
- Page 182 and 183: 182Conclusiontester les prédiction
- Page 186 and 187: 186BibliographieBrysbaert, M., Vitu
- Page 188 and 189: 188BibliographieFerrand, L., Segui,
- Page 190 and 191: 190BibliographieGrainger, J., & Jac
- Page 192 and 193: 192BibliographieKay, J., & Bishop,
- Page 194 and 195: 194BibliographieMewhort, D. J. K.,
- Page 196 and 197: 196BibliographiePerea, M., & Pollat
- Page 198 and 199: 198BibliographieSeidenberg, M. S.,
- Page 200 and 201: 200BibliographieTreiman, R., & Zuko
- Page 202 and 203: 202AnnexesAnnexes
- Page 204 and 205: 204AnnexesAnnexe II : Temps de rép
- Page 206 and 207: 206AnnexesAnnexe IV : Temps de rép
- Page 208 and 209: 208Annexesd t 88 3 fixed fI%tdd d 3
- Page 210 and 211: 210Annexesoo u 3395 57 too tuoo $ 5
- Page 212 and 213: 212AnnexesAnnexe VI : Liste des 120
- Page 214 and 215: 214AnnexesAnnexe VII : Détail des
- Page 216 and 217: 216AnnexesSujets Stim. Erreur Sujet
- Page 218 and 219: 218AnnexesSujet Moyenne % Err ES Su
- Page 220 and 221: 220AnnexesAnnexe X : Stimuli employ
- Page 222 and 223: 222AnnexesAnnexe XI : Stimuli emplo
- Page 224 and 225: 224Appendice IMROM-P : An interacti
- Page 226 and 227: 226Appendice Ilanguages (French, Ge
- Page 228 and 229: 228Appendice Isummed frequency of f
- Page 230 and 231: 230Appendice IClearly, the ability
- Page 232 and 233: 232Appendice Ito an orthographic le
- Page 234 and 235:
234Appendice IFigure 6 gives an ill
- Page 236 and 237:
236Appendice Iestimator set study,
- Page 238 and 239:
238Appendice ISTEP 3. CRITERION SET
- Page 240 and 241:
240Appendice Iteractive processes o
- Page 242 and 243:
242Appendice INotwithstanding, a no
- Page 244 and 245:
244Appendice I1994). Our stratagem
- Page 246 and 247:
246Appendice ILass, U. (1995). Einf
- Page 248 and 249:
248Appendice IAPPENDIXA1. Cleaning
- Page 250 and 251:
250Appendice IIA phoneme effect in
- Page 252 and 253:
252Appendice IIAs shown in Table 1,
- Page 254 and 255:
254Appendice IImay depend on their
- Page 256 and 257:
Appendice III
- Page 258 and 259:
258Appendice IIIHowever, an unsolve
- Page 260 and 261:
260Appendice IIIgrapheme compared t
- Page 262 and 263:
262Appendice IIIRead, J. D. (1983).
- Page 264:
264Appendice IIIAppendix AMean resp