13.07.2015 Views

Le resurfaçage total de la hanche : le retour du ... - desc orthopedie

Le resurfaçage total de la hanche : le retour du ... - desc orthopedie

Le resurfaçage total de la hanche : le retour du ... - desc orthopedie

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1321. Pol<strong>la</strong>rd TC, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, and Bannister GC. Treatment of theyoung active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid<strong>total</strong> hip arthrop<strong>la</strong>sty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88: 592-600,2006.22. Schnurr C, Michael JW, Eysel P, and Konig DP. Image<strong>le</strong>ss navigation of hipresurfacing arthrop<strong>la</strong>sty increases the imp<strong>la</strong>nt accuracy. Int Orthop 2007.23. Steffen RT, Pandit HP, Pa<strong>la</strong>n J, Beard DJ, Gund<strong>le</strong> R, McLardy-Smith P, MurrayDW, and Gill HS. The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthrop<strong>la</strong>sty: ANINDEPENDENT SERIES. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90: 436-441, 2008.24. Treacy RB, McBry<strong>de</strong> CW, and Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacingarthrop<strong>la</strong>sty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87: 167-170, 2005.25. Vendittoli PA, Ganapathi M, and Lavigne M. Blood and urine metal ion <strong>le</strong>vels inyoung and active patients after Birmingham hip resurfacing arthrop<strong>la</strong>sty. J Bone Joint Surg Br89: 989; author reply 989-990, 2007.26. Vendittoli PA, Mottard S, Roy AG, Dupont C, and Lavigne M. Chromium andcobalt ion re<strong>le</strong>ase following the Durom high carbon content, forged metal-on-metal surfacerep<strong>la</strong>cement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89: 441-448, 2007.27. Wagner H. Surface rep<strong>la</strong>cement arthrop<strong>la</strong>sty of the hip. Clin Orthop Re<strong>la</strong>t Res 102-130, 1978.Légen<strong>de</strong>sFigure 1 : Resurfaçage <strong>total</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>la</strong> <strong>hanche</strong>.Figure 2 : <strong>Le</strong> <strong>resurfaçage</strong> <strong>de</strong> Freeman métal/polyéthylène.Figure 3 : Resurfaçage mo<strong>de</strong>rne métal/métal cupu<strong>le</strong> ciment, acétabulum press fit.Figure 4 : Systèmes <strong>de</strong> visée endoarticu<strong>la</strong>ires.Figure 5 : Visée par navigation.Figure 6 : Visée guidée par amplificateur .Figure 7 : La cupu<strong>le</strong> est située au centre <strong>du</strong> colFigure 8 : Voie minima<strong>le</strong> invasive antéro<strong>la</strong>téra<strong>le</strong>.Figure 9 : Resurfaçage <strong>total</strong>/Tige et grosse tête.Figure 10 : Fracture <strong>du</strong> col sur : os fragi<strong>le</strong> ( dialysé = contre indication )Figure 11 : Contre indication : acétabulum non rétentif.Figure 12 : Contre indication : col court, très réroversé.Figure 13 : 35 Ans, arthrose sur épiphysiolyse.Figure 14 : Resurfaçage avec correction <strong>de</strong> <strong>la</strong> malposition <strong>de</strong> <strong>la</strong> tête.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!