Pampalon R, Raymond G. (2003) Un indice <strong>de</strong> défavorisation matériel<strong>le</strong> et socia<strong>le</strong>. Sonapplication au secteur <strong>de</strong> la santé et du bien-être. Santé Société et Solidarité. Revue<strong>de</strong> l’observatoire franco-québécois <strong>de</strong> la santé et <strong>de</strong> la solidarité 2003; (1):191-208.Pampalon R, Raymond G. Un indice <strong>de</strong> défavorisation pour la planification <strong>de</strong> la santé etdu bien-être au Québec. Maladies chroniques au Canada 2000; 21(3) : 104-113..Paquet G, Hamel D. (2005). « Des alliés pour la santé <strong>de</strong>s tout-petits vivant au bas <strong>de</strong>l’échel<strong>le</strong> socia<strong>le</strong> », Étu<strong>de</strong> longitudina<strong>le</strong> du développement <strong>de</strong>s enfants du Québec(ÉLDEQ 1998-2002) - De la naissance à 4 ans, Québec, Institut <strong>de</strong> la statistique duQuébec, vol.3, fascicu<strong>le</strong> 4.Patel RR, Tootla R, Ing<strong>le</strong>hart MR. Does oral health affect self perceptions, parental ratingsand vi<strong>de</strong>o-based assessments of children's smi<strong>le</strong>s? Community Dent Oral Epi<strong>de</strong>miol2007; 35(1):44-52.Peressini S, Leake JL, Mayhall JT, Maar M, Tru<strong>de</strong>au R. Preva<strong>le</strong>nce of early childhoodcaries among First Nations children, District of Manitoulin, Ontario. Int J PaediatrDent 2004; 14(2):101-10.Peretz B, Ram D, Azo E, Efrat Y. Preschool caries as an indicator of future caries: alongitudinal study. Pediatr Dent 2003; 25(2):114-8.Pine CM, Adair PM, Nicoll AD, Burnsi<strong>de</strong> G, Petersen PE, Beighton D, Gil<strong>le</strong>tt A, An<strong>de</strong>rsonR, Anwar S, Brailsford S, Broukal Z, Chestnutt IG, Dec<strong>le</strong>rck D, Ping FX, Ferro R,Freeman R, Gugushe T, Harris R, Lin B, Lo EC, Maupomé G, Moola MH, NaidooS, Ramos-Gomez F, Samaranayake LP, Shahid S, Skeie MS, Splieth C, Sutton BK,Soo TC, Whelton H. International comparisons of health inequalities in childhood<strong>de</strong>ntal caries. Community Dent Health 2004; 21(1 Suppl):121-30.Pitts NB, Fyffe HE. The effect of varying diagnostic thresholds upon clinical caries data fora low preva<strong>le</strong>nce group. J Dent Res 1988; 67(3):592-6.Pitts NB, Evans DJ. The <strong>de</strong>ntal caries experience of 5-year-old children in the UnitedKingdom. Surveys coordinated by the British Association for the Study ofCommunity Dentistry in 1995/96. Community Dent Health 1997; 14(1):47-52.Pitts NB, Stamm JW. International Consensus Workshop on Caries Clinical Trials (ICW-CCT)--final consensus statements: agreeing where the evi<strong>de</strong>nce <strong>le</strong>ads. J Dent Res2004; 83 Spec No C:C125-8.Poutanen R, Lahti S, Tolvanen M, Hausen H.. Parental influence on children's oral healthrelatedbehavior. Acta Odontol Scand 2006; 64(5):286-92.Powell LV. Caries prediction: a review of the literature. Community Dent Oral Epi<strong>de</strong>miol1998; 26(6):361-71.Psoter WJ, Zhang H, Pendrys DG, Morse DE, Mayne ST. Classification of <strong>de</strong>ntal cariespatterns in the primary <strong>de</strong>ntition: a multidimensional scaling analysis. CommunityDent Oral Epi<strong>de</strong>miol 2003; 31(3):231-8.Psoter WJ, Morse DE, Pendrys DG, Zhang H, Mayne ST. Historical evolution of primary<strong>de</strong>ntition caries pattern <strong>de</strong>finitions. Pediatr Dent 2004; 26(6):508-11.Quiñonez R, Santos RG, Wilson S, Cross H. The relationship between child temperamentand early childhood caries. Pediatr Dent 2001a ; 23(1):5-10.87
Quiñonez RB, Keels MA, Vann WF Jr, McIver FT, Hel<strong>le</strong>r K, Whitt JK. Early childhoodcaries: analysis of psychosocial and biological factors in a high-risk population.Caries Res 2001b; 35(5):376-83.Radford JR, Ballantyne HM, Nugent ZJ, Robertson M, Longbottom C, Pitts NB, BeightonD, Brailsford SR. Does social <strong>de</strong>privation in 1, 2, 3 and 4-year-old Scottish infantsinfluence the frequency isolation of caries-associated micro-organisms? J Dent2001; 29(5):325-32.Record S, Montgomery DF, Milano M. Fluori<strong>de</strong> supp<strong>le</strong>mentation and caries prevention. JPediatr Health Care 2000; 14(5):247-9.Régie <strong>de</strong> l’Assurance maladie du Québec (RAMQ). Rapports d’étu<strong>de</strong>s et statistiques. Enligne : www.prog.ramq.gouv.qc.ca/IST/CD/CDF_DifsnInfoStatsCNC_iut/DifReis HT, Wilson IM, Monestere C. What is smiling is beautiful and good. Eur J SocPsychol 1990; 20:259-67.Reisine S, Litt M. Social and psychological theories and their use for <strong>de</strong>ntal practice. IntDent J 1993; 43(3 Suppl 1):279-87.Reisine S, Douglass JM. Psychosocial and behavioral issues in early childhood caries.Community Dent Oral Epi<strong>de</strong>miol 1998; 26(1 Suppl):32-44.Reisine ST, Psoter W. Socioeconomic status and se<strong>le</strong>cted behavioral <strong>de</strong>terminants as riskfactors for <strong>de</strong>ntal caries. J Dent Educ 2001; 65(10):1009-16.Reisine S, Tel<strong>le</strong>z M, Wil<strong>le</strong>m J, Sohn W, Ismail A. Relationship between caregiver's andchild's caries preva<strong>le</strong>nce among disadvantaged African Americans. Community DentOral Epi<strong>de</strong>miol 2008; 36(3):191-200.Ribeiro NM, Ribeiro MA.[Breastfeeding and early childhood caries: a critical review] JPediatr 2004; 80(5 Suppl):S199-210.Ripa LW. Nursing caries: a comprehensive review. Pediatr Dent 1988; 10(4):268-82.Roberts CR, Warren JJ, Weber-Gasparoni K. Relationships Between Caregivers' Responsesto Oral Health Screening Questions and Early Childhood Caries. J Public HealthDent 2009.Rodrigues CS, Sheiham A. The relationships between dietary gui<strong>de</strong>lines, sugar intake andcaries in primary teeth in low income Brazilian 3-year-olds: a longitudinal study. IntJ Paediatr Dent 2000; 10(1):47-55.Rölla G. Why is sucrose so cariogenic? The ro<strong>le</strong> of glucosyltransferase andpolysacchari<strong>de</strong>s. Scand J Dent Res 1989; 97(2):115-9.Rong WS, Bian JY, Wang WJ, Wang JD. Effectiveness of an oral health education andcaries prevention program in kin<strong>de</strong>rgartens in China. Community Dent OralEpi<strong>de</strong>miol 2003; 31(6):412-6.Rosenbloom RG, Tinanoff N. Salivary Streptococcus mutans <strong>le</strong>vels in patient before,during and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 100(1):35-7.Rosenblatt A, Zarzar P. The preva<strong>le</strong>nce of early childhood caries in 12- to 36-month-oldchildren in Recife, Brazil. ASDC J Dent Child 2002; 69(3):319-24, 236.88
- Page 1 and 2:
SUZANNE HÉBERTÉTUDE PRÉLIMINAIRE
- Page 3 and 4:
iiiAvant-ProposJ’aimerais remerci
- Page 5 and 6:
1.8.5.3. Plan de recherche.........
- Page 7 and 8:
viiListe des figuresFIGURE 1 : EXEM
- Page 9 and 10:
ixListe des abréviationsAAPD Ameri
- Page 11 and 12:
21.1.1. Déterminants principaux1.1
- Page 13 and 14:
4glucose à l’intérieur de la ce
- Page 15 and 16:
6Tableau 1 : Définition de la cari
- Page 17 and 18:
8Plusieurs études, ont rapporté q
- Page 19 and 20:
10générale, Almeida et coll. (200
- Page 21 and 22:
12(Douglass et al., 2002; Dye et al
- Page 23 and 24:
14Milgrom et coll. (2000) ont aussi
- Page 25 and 26:
161.3.1.4. Prévention d’une tran
- Page 27 and 28:
18Des anomalies de développement d
- Page 29 and 30:
20et al., 2000; Enjary et al., 2006
- Page 31 and 32:
22à d’autres occupations. Le bib
- Page 33 and 34:
24Parenting Stress Index -Short For
- Page 35 and 36:
26fréquence à laquelle il est eff
- Page 37:
28prévention débute à 5 ans et d
- Page 40:
311.8. Méthodologie de l’enquêt
- Page 44 and 45:
35l’enfance a augmenté de façon
- Page 46: 372. Méthodologie2.1. Variables2.1
- Page 50: 41mesurait environ 2.5 m par 3.5 m.
- Page 54 and 55: 453. RésultatsNous avons distribu
- Page 56 and 57: 47Tableau 3 : Caractéristiques soc
- Page 58 and 59: 49Figure 4 : Variations de l’indi
- Page 60 and 61: 51Figure 5 : Distribution de la fr
- Page 62 and 63: 53Parmi les 49 parents ayant mentio
- Page 64 and 65: 553.3.1.1. Les enfants de 4 ans et
- Page 66 and 67: 573.3.1.2. Les enfants de 3 à 4 an
- Page 68 and 69: 59nombre de dents présentes en bou
- Page 70 and 71: 613.4. AnalysesDes analyses descrip
- Page 72 and 73: 63professionnelles et donner la ré
- Page 74 and 75: 65développement des enfants du Qu
- Page 76 and 77: 67défavorisation matérielle qui c
- Page 78 and 79: 69la méthode visuo-tactile (Cleato
- Page 80 and 81: 71examinateurs affecte la validité
- Page 82 and 83: 735. ConclusionCe projet a été ef
- Page 84 and 85: 75RéférencesAbernathy JR, Graves
- Page 86 and 87: Berkowitz RJ. Mutans streptococci:
- Page 88 and 89: Douglass JM, Yi W, Xue ZB, Tinanoff
- Page 90 and 91: GOUVERNEMENT DU QUÉBEC A ( MINIST
- Page 92 and 93: Kanellis MJ. Caries risk assessment
- Page 94 and 95: Lopez Del Valle L, Velazquez-Quinta
- Page 98 and 99: Rugg-Gunn AJ, Roberts GJ, Wright WG
- Page 100 and 101: Tiberia MJ, Milnes AR, Feigal RJ, M
- Page 102 and 103: Zlotolow IM. Clinical manifestation
- Page 104 and 105: Étude sur la santé dentaire chez
- Page 106 and 107: 97répartis dans les quatre CSSS (
- Page 108 and 109: 99Instruments de mesureQuestionnair
- Page 110 and 111: 101
- Page 112 and 113: 103
- Page 114 and 115: Méthode d’examenL’examen des d
- Page 116 and 117: 107N.B. Il peut être difficile de
- Page 119 and 120: Annexe VFormulaire d’examen110
- Page 121 and 122: Annexe VIFormulaire de consentement
- Page 123 and 124: 114
- Page 125 and 126: Annexe VIILettre d’autorisation d
- Page 127 and 128: 118
- Page 129: 120Ce projet n’a pas à être app