THESE UNIQUE El Hassane Kéhien-Piho TOU - Nutridev

THESE UNIQUE El Hassane Kéhien-Piho TOU - Nutridev THESE UNIQUE El Hassane Kéhien-Piho TOU - Nutridev

25.02.2015 Views

Figure 1. Dendrogram showing the classification of lactic acid bacteria based on phenotypic characters Figure2.Tentative identification of lactic acid bacteria based on API 50 CHL and percentage of occurrence of species. Article 3: Essai de modification du procédé traditionnel de fabrication des bouillies de mil fermenté ben-saalga en vue d’augmenter leur densité énergétique Figure 1: Schéma de préparation des bouillies selon les différents procédés. Figure 2: Cinétiques d’acidification des pâtes au cours de la fermentation (étape de repos de la pâte). Figure 3: Evolution de la consistance des bouillies en fonction de leurs teneurs en matière sèche. Article 4: Effect of different process combinations on the fermentation kinetics, microflora and energy density of ben-saalga, a fermented gruel from Burkina Faso Figure 1. Description of different process combinations to improve the energy density of bensaalga. Figure 2. Changes in pH during the fermentation steps in control and process combinations: pre-cooking and addition of malt (CM); precooking and inoculation by backslopping (CI); pre-cooking, addition of malt and inoculation (CMI) Figure 3. Kinetics of sugar consumption and formation during fermentation at the settling step in control (A) and CI (B), CM (C) and CMI (D) process combinations. Bars are standard deviations. Figure 4. Kinetics of the formation of ethanol and organic acids (lactic and acetic acids) during fermentation at the settling step in control (A) and CI (B), CM (C) and CMI (D) process combinations. Bars are standard deviations. Figure 5. Effect of the different process combinations, traditional (control), cooking and addition of malt (CM), cooking and inoculation (CI) and cooking, addition of malt and inoculation (CMI) on gruel consistency. Figure 6. Effect of the different process combinations, traditional (control), cooking and addition of malt (CM), cooking and inoculation (CI) and cooking, addition of malt and inoculation (CMI) on gruel energy density. Different letters indicate significantly different means (P < 0.05) as assessed by ANOVA and Duncan_s multiple range test. ii

Article 5: Improving the nutritional quality of ben-saalga, a traditional fermented milletbased gruel, by co-fermenting millet with groundnut and modifying the processing method. Figure 1. Description of the two processing methods (the traditional one and the modified one) experimented on blends of pearl millet and groundnut to produce enriched fermented gruels. Figure 2. Changes in pH (A) ( : Millet-groundnut and : millet) and concentrations of sugar (B) ( :Glucose, :Fructose, :Melibiose and : Maltose), ethanol, lactate and acetate (C) ( : Lactate, : Ethanol and : Acetate) in the soaking of milletgroundnut blend. Bars indicate standard deviation. Figure 3. Changes in pH during the fermentation step in MG-T and MG-CMI processing methods ( : MG-T and : MG-CMI). Bars indicate standard deviation. Figure 4. Changes in sugar concentrations ( :Glucose, :Fructose, :Melibiose and : Maltose) in MG-T (A) and MG-CMI (B), and in ethanol, lactate and acetate concentrations ( :Lactate, :Ethanol and :Acetate) in MG-T (C) and MG-CMI (D) in supernatant of pastes during the fermentation step. Bars indicate standard deviation. TABLEAUX Introduction Tableau 1: Besoins énergétiques des enfants selon les groupes d’âges (6 à 24 mois) Tableau 2: Apports recommandés en quelques nutriments chez les enfants de 6 à 24 mois Tableau 3 : Quantités moyennes d’ingérées en lait maternel des enfants des pays en développement pendant les deux premières années de leur vie Tableau 4 : Densités énergétiques (en kcal/100g) minimales requises pour les aliments de complément (kcal/100g) Tableau 5 : Densités en protéines et en quelques micronutriments nécessaires dans les aliments de complément Tableau 6. Production céréalière au Burkina Faso : campagnes 2001-2002 et 2002-2003 Matériels et méthodes Tableau 1 : formulation de la bouillie co-fermentée (mil et arachide) avec 15% de sucre iii

Figure 1. Dendrogram showing the classification of lactic acid bacteria based on phenotypic<br />

characters<br />

Figure2.Tentative identification of lactic acid bacteria based on API 50 CHL and percentage<br />

of occurrence of species.<br />

Article 3: Essai de modification du procédé traditionnel de fabrication des bouillies de mil<br />

fermenté ben-saalga en vue d’augmenter leur densité énergétique<br />

Figure 1: Schéma de préparation des bouillies selon les différents procédés.<br />

Figure 2: Cinétiques d’acidification des pâtes au cours de la fermentation (étape de repos de<br />

la pâte).<br />

Figure 3: Evolution de la consistance des bouillies en fonction de leurs teneurs en matière<br />

sèche.<br />

Article 4: Effect of different process combinations on the fermentation kinetics, microflora<br />

and energy density of ben-saalga, a fermented gruel from Burkina Faso<br />

Figure 1. Description of different process combinations to improve the energy density of bensaalga.<br />

Figure 2. Changes in pH during the fermentation steps in control and process combinations:<br />

pre-cooking and addition of malt (CM); precooking and inoculation by backslopping<br />

(CI); pre-cooking, addition of malt and inoculation (CMI)<br />

Figure 3. Kinetics of sugar consumption and formation during fermentation at the settling<br />

step in control (A) and CI (B), CM (C) and CMI (D) process combinations. Bars<br />

are standard deviations.<br />

Figure 4. Kinetics of the formation of ethanol and organic acids (lactic and acetic acids)<br />

during fermentation at the settling step in control (A) and CI (B), CM (C) and CMI<br />

(D) process combinations. Bars are standard deviations.<br />

Figure 5. Effect of the different process combinations, traditional (control), cooking and<br />

addition of malt (CM), cooking and inoculation (CI) and cooking, addition of malt<br />

and inoculation (CMI) on gruel consistency.<br />

Figure 6. Effect of the different process combinations, traditional (control), cooking and<br />

addition of malt (CM), cooking and inoculation (CI) and cooking, addition of malt<br />

and inoculation (CMI) on gruel energy density. Different letters indicate<br />

significantly different means (P < 0.05) as assessed by ANOVA and Duncan_s<br />

multiple range test.<br />

ii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!