Programme saison vidéo 2007 #31

Programme saison vidéo 2007 #31 Programme saison vidéo 2007 #31

saisonvideo.com
from saisonvideo.com More from this publisher
07.11.2014 Views

S a i s o n V i d é o 2 0 0 7 10 – 23 FÉVRIER 2007. SOLRE LE CHATEAU, VITRINE PAULIN 2 RUE DE BEAUMONT 59740 – SOLRE LE CHATEAU S I M O N W E B B PORTRAIT Exposition visible uniquement de la rue de 19 h à 20 h 30, organisée en collaboration avec Cent lieux d’art, 7 hameau d’Offies, 59216 Dimont : +33 3 27 61 66 19 centlieuxdart@wanadoo.fr Vernissage le vendredi 9 Février à 18 H. Le dispositif de départ est simple. Les questions qu’il soulève le sont moins. Durant une année, entre 1999 et 2000, l’artiste s’est astreint à se prendre quotidiennement en photo. Toujours le même cadrage, fond et expression. Le défilement rapide des photographies mises bout à bout crée la vidéo intitulée Portrait. Face au visage mouvant et changeant que présente le film, il paraît évident qu’un pluriel en place du singulier eut mieux valu pour le titre. Certes c’est toujours la même personne qui apparaît mais sous 365 visages sensiblement différents. Les cheveux poussent, les traces de fatigue apparaissent… Le temps pose inévitablement ses marques. Quand et comment donc saisir un visage ? Que vaut le caractère permanent d’un portrait ? Par ce dispositif, Simon Webb en nie le critère habituel qui consiste à fixer un moment précis. Ce qu’il fige devient insaisissable. Le portrait en lui-même ne définit pas, il garantit l’existence d’un moment fugace inexorablement perdu. Ça a été là, point. Alors, quel “ça a été là” choisir quand on veut faire “tirer son portrait”. Quelle expression montrer et comment la faire surgir au moment de la prise de vue ? Ajoutons à cela la crainte, soulevée par Roland Barthes, d’être pris pour “un sale type” sur le cliché final. L’exercice de Simon Webb peut apporter quelques solutions. Mais au-delà du portrait c’est bien du temps dont il s'agit. Un cliché par jour c’est une marque, un arrêt dans le continuum. Faire le relevé des changements physiques que le temps implique, les documenter par des photographies, c’est avant tout l’impression de maîtriser le flux temporel. En vain. Hélène Dantic 18

S a i s o n V i d é o 2 0 0 7 To set up is simple. The questions raised less so. During a year, in 1999-2000, the artist forced himself to be photographed every day. Always the same frame, background and expression. One photograph rapidly after another results in the video entitled Portrait. Confronted with the moving and changing face presented in the film, it is obvious that a plural instead of a singular would have been better for the title. Indeed, it is always the same person who appears but with 365 noticeably different faces. The hair grows, signs of tiredness appear… Time inevitably leaves its mark. When and how should we capture a face? What is the permanent nature of a portrait worth? With this set up, Simon Webb denies the usual criteria which consist of fixing a precise moment. What is fixed becomes elusive. The portrait in itself does not define; it guarantees the existence of a fleeting moment to be inevitably lost. It was there, gone. So which "it was there" does one choose to "make your portrait"? What expression should one show and how does it come through when the photograph is taken? Added to that is the fear, referred to by Roland Barthes, of being taken for a "bad guy" on the final photo. Simon Webb's exercise can provide some solutions. But beyond the portrait, we are talking about time. A picture a day is a mark, a pause in continuity. To take note of the physical changes that time implies, to document them with photographs, is above all the impression of mastering the flux of time. In vain. Hélène Dantic 19

S a i s o n V i d é o 2 0 0 7<br />

To set up is simple. The questions raised less so. During a year, in 1999-2000, the artist forced himself to be photographed every day. Always the<br />

same frame, background and expression. One photograph rapidly after another results in the video entitled Portrait. Confronted with the moving<br />

and changing face presented in the film, it is obvious that a plural instead of a singular would have been better for the title. Indeed, it is always<br />

the same person who appears but with 365 noticeably different faces. The hair grows, signs of tiredness appear… Time inevitably leaves its mark.<br />

When and how should we capture a face? What is the permanent nature of a portrait worth? With this set up, Simon Webb denies the usual criteria<br />

which consist of fixing a precise moment. What is fixed becomes elusive. The portrait in itself does not define; it guarantees the existence of a<br />

fleeting moment to be inevitably lost. It was there, gone.<br />

So which "it was there" does one choose to "make your portrait"? What expression should one show and how does it come through when the<br />

photograph is taken? Added to that is the fear, referred to by Roland Barthes, of being taken for a "bad guy" on the final photo. Simon Webb's<br />

exercise can provide some solutions.<br />

But beyond the portrait, we are talking about time. A picture a day is a mark, a pause in continuity. To take note of the physical changes that time<br />

implies, to document them with photographs, is above all the impression of mastering the flux of time. In vain.<br />

Hélène Dantic<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!