Premiers - Outil de Suivi des Contrats
Premiers - Outil de Suivi des Contrats Premiers - Outil de Suivi des Contrats
Annexe IV _____________________________________________ Performance measures Trials were performed on one-month-old juveniles, in a wooden box containing nine open areas (9 cm long × 9 cm wide ×6 cm high) that were aligned in three rows of three. Each open area was considered as an independent unit. Trials were performed at an ambient temperature of approximately 28°C. Turtles were randomly distributed into groups of nine individuals. Each group of nine turtles was tested twice before and twice after feeding. The two replicate trials per nutritional status were performed alternatively during the morning and the afternoon, at least two days apart. Trials were videotaped with a numerical camera, to prevent experimenter-linked inconvenience effect during trial. The videotaped record began when all turtles were placed upside down and was stopped after a maximal duration of 30 minutes. The data were collected a posteriori from the videotapes. We studied two different and independent measures revealing different components in the righting response of the turtles: (1) the Latency time, defined as the time at the first movement of the turtle since it was placed upside down, and (2) the Time to right, defined as the time for a turtle to right itself since it started to move. The juvenile growth rate was defined as: Growth, survival and sex identification Growth rate = ln(weight ) - ln(weight ) t t 0 t-t 0 weight t = juvenile weight at time of experiment weight t0 = juvenile weight at birth t-t 0 = age of juvenile at time of experiment 9
Annexe IV _____________________________________________ Juvenile survival was defined as the time (in days) that a given individual stayed alive (quantitative variable). Juvenile sex was determined a posteriori by dissection and microscopic observation of gonad morphology (Pieau, 1972; Yntema, 1976). Statistical analyses The dependent variables (Latency time and Time to right) were not normally distributed even after a variety of mathematical transformations. Therefore, we modeled the both variables with a generalized linear mixed model, which included fixed and random effects and a gamma distribution with a log-link function as the error distribution. The associations between the measures of righting response and different variables were determined by using quasilikelihood estimation of the parameter vector method trough an iterative process. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS for Windows version 9.1 (SAS institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA, 2003). Computations were performed with SAS Macro program GLIMMIX, which iteratively runs SAS Procedure MIXED. Separated analyses were conducted, depending on the dependent variables (Latency time and Time to right) and incubation treatment (constant and fluctuating temperatures regimes). The independent fixed effects included nutritional status (before or after feeding) and offspring sex (male “M” or female “F”). Juvenile growth rate and survival were added as continuous individual co-variables, and two-way interactions were also added to the model. We also implemented temperature regime (B, C or D) as fixed effect in fluctuating treatment analyses. Juvenile identity nested within clutch, clutch identity and all two-way interactions with clutch were defined as random effects. A backward stepwise procedure was used to select the final minimal model, according to the Akaike information criteria (AIC) for model comparison (Crawley, 1993; Burnham & Anderson, 1998) 10
- Page 171 and 172: ANNEXE II ASSESSMENT OF PATTERNS OF
- Page 173 and 174: Annexe II _________________________
- Page 175 and 176: Annexe II _________________________
- Page 177 and 178: Annexe II _________________________
- Page 179 and 180: Annexe II _________________________
- Page 181 and 182: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 183 and 184: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 185 and 186: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 187 and 188: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 189 and 190: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 191 and 192: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 193 and 194: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 195 and 196: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 197 and 198: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 199 and 200: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 201 and 202: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 203 and 204: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 205 and 206: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 207 and 208: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 209 and 210: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 211 and 212: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 213 and 214: ANNEXE IV THE RIGHTING RESPONSE AS
- Page 215 and 216: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 217 and 218: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 219 and 220: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 221: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 225 and 226: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 227 and 228: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 229 and 230: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 231 and 232: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 233 and 234: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 235 and 236: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 237 and 238: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 239 and 240: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 241 and 242: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 243 and 244: TURTLE, AN EXOTIC AND INTRODUCED SP
Annexe IV<br />
_____________________________________________<br />
Juvenile survival was <strong>de</strong>fined as the time (in days) that a given individual stayed alive<br />
(quantitative variable). Juvenile sex was <strong>de</strong>termined a posteriori by dissection and<br />
microscopic observation of gonad morphology (Pieau, 1972; Yntema, 1976).<br />
Statistical analyses<br />
The <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt variables (Latency time and Time to right) were not normally distributed even<br />
after a variety of mathematical transformations. Therefore, we mo<strong>de</strong>led the both variables<br />
with a generalized linear mixed mo<strong>de</strong>l, which inclu<strong>de</strong>d fixed and random effects and a gamma<br />
distribution with a log-link function as the error distribution. The associations between the<br />
measures of righting response and different variables were <strong>de</strong>termined by using quasilikelihood<br />
estimation of the parameter vector method trough an iterative process. Statistical<br />
analyses were performed using SAS for Windows version 9.1 (SAS institute Inc., Cary, NC,<br />
USA, 2003). Computations were performed with SAS Macro program GLIMMIX, which<br />
iteratively runs SAS Procedure MIXED.<br />
Separated analyses were conducted, <strong>de</strong>pending on the <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt variables (Latency time and<br />
Time to right) and incubation treatment (constant and fluctuating temperatures regimes). The<br />
in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt fixed effects inclu<strong>de</strong>d nutritional status (before or after feeding) and offspring<br />
sex (male “M” or female “F”). Juvenile growth rate and survival were ad<strong>de</strong>d as continuous<br />
individual co-variables, and two-way interactions were also ad<strong>de</strong>d to the mo<strong>de</strong>l. We also<br />
implemented temperature regime (B, C or D) as fixed effect in fluctuating treatment analyses.<br />
Juvenile i<strong>de</strong>ntity nested within clutch, clutch i<strong>de</strong>ntity and all two-way interactions with clutch<br />
were <strong>de</strong>fined as random effects. A backward stepwise procedure was used to select the final<br />
minimal mo<strong>de</strong>l, according to the Akaike information criteria (AIC) for mo<strong>de</strong>l comparison<br />
(Crawley, 1993; Burnham & An<strong>de</strong>rson, 1998)<br />
10