Premiers - Outil de Suivi des Contrats
Premiers - Outil de Suivi des Contrats Premiers - Outil de Suivi des Contrats
Annexe III _____________________________________________ temperature-dependent sex determination species (Bull & Vogt, 1981; Mrosovsky & Pieau, 1991). During the TSP, fluctuations of temperature influence sex differentiation, so an increase of the TSP may influence the sex of the embryo, irremediably determined only at the end of the TSP (review in Pieau & Dorizzi, 2004). In this context, moisture conditions may indirectly influence sex determination of the embryo. In our case, we could not detect a possible effect of moisture substrate on sex partly because we performed our experiment at constant incubation temperature. This points out the importance to use incubations conditions that are ecologically relevant (i.e. fluctuating water potentials and temperatures) in laboratory studies. Hatchling and yearling mass Most of studies have suggested that effects of incubation environment (temperature and moisture) may influence the pattern of selective process of phenotypic traits affecting individual fitness (Gutzke et al., 1983; Morris et al., 1983; Miller, Packard & Packard, 1987; Finkler, 1999; Packard et al., 1999b; Angilletta et al., 2000). Hatchling mass was often proposed as affecting a component of lifetime fitness in turtles, with larger hatchlings supposed to have an advantage over smaller individuals (i.e. the “bigger is better hypothesis”; (see Miller et al., 1987; Packard & Packard, 1988; see Janzen, 1994)). This hypothesis considers hatchling mass as a good index of hatchlings quality: larger individuals may have a better survival rate (Janzen, 1993; Janzen, Tucker & Paukstis, 2000; Kolbe & Janzen, 2002). In our experiment, we detect a significant and positive correlation between hatchling mass and the time spent by eggs on wet substrate during incubation (Figure 3.b). We also showed a positive relation between initial egg mass and mass of hatchlings (Figure 3.a). Moreover, moisture substrate influences the mass of hatchling turtles in interaction with the initial mass of the eggs (Table 2.3). Finally, hatchling mass varied also significantly among clutches, 16
Annexe III _____________________________________________ suggesting a genetic and heritable component that permit natural selection to act on this phenotypic trait (Stearns, 1992). So, our results support a potential influence of hydric conditions within the nest on quality (i.e. mass) of hatchlings that may affect individual fitness. However, we also found that significant effects of moisture substrate on juvenile mass disappeared approximately after one year of life (Table 2.4). Thus, hypothesis that larger mass at hatching would confer faster growth on hatchlings, regardless of the source of differences in mass at hatching was refuted (Brooks et al., 1991). We didn’t either detect an effect of initial egg mass or clutch on yearling mass (Table 2.4). On the other hand, we detected a high and significant effect of offspring sex, with females heavier than males (Figure 4). Hydric conditions within the nest may thus have only short-term effects and may influence juvenile quality only in the early stage of life. CONCLUSION Mortality of embryos in Trachemys scripta elegans, a turtle with flexible-shelled eggs, was not affected by the range and change of moisture levels used in our experiment. However, we performed this experiment under constant incubation temperature, while temperature and moisture probably exert a combined effect on eggs and embryos. Other studies confounding effects of temperature and water potential. Finally, few authors investigated the range of substrate moisture in association with nest temperature that might influence eggs and resultant hatchlings, as well as fluctuating water potentials (Gutzke et al., 1986; Tucker et al., 1997; Tucker et al., 1998; Ji et al., 1999; Hewavisenthi et al., 2001; Tucker, Paukstis & Janzen, 2001). As expected, incubation length and hatchling mass were negatively related with time on dry substrate, thus hydric conditions may affect hatchling quality. However, moisture substrate 17
- Page 145 and 146: Bibliographie _____________________
- Page 147 and 148: Bibliographie _____________________
- Page 149 and 150: Bibliographie _____________________
- Page 151 and 152: TABLE DES ANNEXES A. Supplementary
- Page 153 and 154: Annexe A __________________________
- Page 155 and 156: Annexe A __________________________
- Page 157 and 158: Annexe A __________________________
- Page 159 and 160: Annexe A __________________________
- Page 161 and 162: Annexe I __________________________
- Page 163 and 164: Annexe I __________________________
- Page 165 and 166: Annexe I __________________________
- Page 167 and 168: Annexe I __________________________
- Page 169 and 170: Annexe I __________________________
- Page 171 and 172: ANNEXE II ASSESSMENT OF PATTERNS OF
- Page 173 and 174: Annexe II _________________________
- Page 175 and 176: Annexe II _________________________
- Page 177 and 178: Annexe II _________________________
- Page 179 and 180: Annexe II _________________________
- Page 181 and 182: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 183 and 184: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 185 and 186: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 187 and 188: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 189 and 190: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 191 and 192: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 193 and 194: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 195: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 199 and 200: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 201 and 202: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 203 and 204: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 205 and 206: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 207 and 208: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 209 and 210: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 211 and 212: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 213 and 214: ANNEXE IV THE RIGHTING RESPONSE AS
- Page 215 and 216: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 217 and 218: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 219 and 220: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 221 and 222: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 223 and 224: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 225 and 226: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 227 and 228: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 229 and 230: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 231 and 232: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 233 and 234: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 235 and 236: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 237 and 238: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 239 and 240: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 241 and 242: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 243 and 244: TURTLE, AN EXOTIC AND INTRODUCED SP
Annexe III<br />
_____________________________________________<br />
suggesting a genetic and heritable component that permit natural selection to act on this<br />
phenotypic trait (Stearns, 1992). So, our results support a potential influence of hydric<br />
conditions within the nest on quality (i.e. mass) of hatchlings that may affect individual<br />
fitness.<br />
However, we also found that significant effects of moisture substrate on juvenile mass<br />
disappeared approximately after one year of life (Table 2.4). Thus, hypothesis that larger mass<br />
at hatching would confer faster growth on hatchlings, regardless of the source of differences<br />
in mass at hatching was refuted (Brooks et al., 1991). We didn’t either <strong>de</strong>tect an effect of<br />
initial egg mass or clutch on yearling mass (Table 2.4). On the other hand, we <strong>de</strong>tected a high<br />
and significant effect of offspring sex, with females heavier than males (Figure 4). Hydric<br />
conditions within the nest may thus have only short-term effects and may influence juvenile<br />
quality only in the early stage of life.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Mortality of embryos in Trachemys scripta elegans, a turtle with flexible-shelled eggs, was<br />
not affected by the range and change of moisture levels used in our experiment. However, we<br />
performed this experiment un<strong>de</strong>r constant incubation temperature, while temperature and<br />
moisture probably exert a combined effect on eggs and embryos. Other studies confounding<br />
effects of temperature and water potential. Finally, few authors investigated the range of<br />
substrate moisture in association with nest temperature that might influence eggs and resultant<br />
hatchlings, as well as fluctuating water potentials (Gutzke et al., 1986; Tucker et al., 1997;<br />
Tucker et al., 1998; Ji et al., 1999; Hewavisenthi et al., 2001; Tucker, Paukstis & Janzen,<br />
2001).<br />
As expected, incubation length and hatchling mass were negatively related with time on dry<br />
substrate, thus hydric conditions may affect hatchling quality. However, moisture substrate<br />
17