Premiers - Outil de Suivi des Contrats
Premiers - Outil de Suivi des Contrats Premiers - Outil de Suivi des Contrats
Annexe III _____________________________________________ INTRODUCTION In oviparous sauropsids, hatching success and hatchling phenotype depend greatly upon the environmental conditions, especially when females lays eggs in a subterranean nest cavity and abandon them, such as turtles and most crocodilians and squamate species do (Gutzke & Packard, 1987; Brooks et al., 1991; Shine & Harlow, 1997). In the absence of parental care, embryos and hatchlings are strongly affected by the physical conditions of the nest and particularly by the temperature and moisture within the nest (Ewert, 1985). Incubation thermal environment strongly influences embryonic growth rate (Pieau & Dorizzi, 1981; Webb et al., 1987; Deeming & Ferguson, 1989; Georges et al., 2005), incubation length (Yntema, 1978), survival of embryos (Brooks et al., 1991) and even sex phenotype in species with temperature-dependent sex determination (Bull, 1980; Janzen & Paukstis, 1991; Ewert, Jackson & Nelson, 1994). Variations in nest temperature also influence neonate morphology (Congdon, Fischer & Gatten, 1995; Brana & Ji, 2000; Ji & Du, 2001), physiology (Angilletta, Winters & Dunham, 2000; Demuth, 2001; Vanhooydonck et al., 2001; Blumberg, Lewis & Sokoloff, 2002; Lee et al., 2003), behavior (Shine et al., 1997; Burger, 1998; Nebeker & Bury, 2000) and survival (Brooks et al., 1991; Pepin, 1991) in diverse species. Despite the large amount of studies on the influence of temperature, this latter effect was often analyzed regardless of substrate moisture effects (Willingham, 2005). However, in natural nests, substrate moisture fluctuates greatly during the incubation period, in association with the pattern of atmospheric temperatures and precipitations (Packard et al., 1985; Bodie, Smith & Burke, 1996). These variations of water potential are particularly important for species that bury shallow nests as aquatic turtles, where eggs may encounter several drought and flooding events during incubation period (Moll & Legler, 1971; Plummer, 1976; Janzen, 1994; Kam, 1994). 2
Annexe III _____________________________________________ Water potential partly controls water exchanges between the eggs and the nesting environment within the nest and may be crucial in embryonic development (Feder, Statel & Gibbs, 1982; Packard, 1991a). During incubation, eggs gain or loss water in association with available moisture in substrate; substrate moisture affects thereby the hydric environment inside the egg (Cagle et al., 1993). Embryos need sufficient water to develop during incubation period (Packard, 1999a), the amount of water absorbed by eggs during incubation playing a key role in reserve production among others. It may thus decisively influence hatching success and life-history traits of hatchling (Gutzke et al., 1987; Janzen, Ast & Paukstis, 1995; Finkler, 1999). Others criterion might be crucial in water exchange between eggs and incubation substrate during incubation such as egg size, correlated to the surface area of the egg that may be in contact with substrate, physical structure of soil and the structure of the eggshell that controlled the porosity and its associated diffusion coefficient (Tracy & Snell, 1985; Gutzke et al., 1987; Marco, Diaz-Paniagua & Hidalgo-Vila, 2004). In turtles, different types of eggshell structure co-exist (Iverson & Ewert, 1991): (i) flexibleshelled eggs (e.g. in painted turtles) with a lightly calcified outer layer, that allows eggs to swell or shrink relatively easily (Tracy, 1980; Feder et al., 1982; Ackerman et al., 1985), and (ii) rigid-shelled eggs (e.g. in softshell turtles) with a heavily calcified outer layer, that relatively may hamper egg swelling and shrinking as much as flexible-shelled eggs (Iverson et al., 1991; Packard, 1991a, 1999a). Several authors studied the influence of substrate water potential on eggs, embryos and hatchlings, and obtained controversial results. To date, no significant influence of hydric environment on sex phenotype was clearly demonstrated (Gutzke & Paukstis, 1983; Paukstis, Gutzke & Packard, 1984 vs. Ji, 1999 #14; Packard, Packard & Benigan, 1991b). Some authors found significant effects of water availability in incubation substrate on embryo's growth rate 3
- Page 131 and 132: Bibliographie _____________________
- Page 133 and 134: Bibliographie _____________________
- Page 135 and 136: Bibliographie _____________________
- Page 137 and 138: Bibliographie _____________________
- Page 139 and 140: Bibliographie _____________________
- Page 141 and 142: Bibliographie _____________________
- Page 143 and 144: Bibliographie _____________________
- Page 145 and 146: Bibliographie _____________________
- Page 147 and 148: Bibliographie _____________________
- Page 149 and 150: Bibliographie _____________________
- Page 151 and 152: TABLE DES ANNEXES A. Supplementary
- Page 153 and 154: Annexe A __________________________
- Page 155 and 156: Annexe A __________________________
- Page 157 and 158: Annexe A __________________________
- Page 159 and 160: Annexe A __________________________
- Page 161 and 162: Annexe I __________________________
- Page 163 and 164: Annexe I __________________________
- Page 165 and 166: Annexe I __________________________
- Page 167 and 168: Annexe I __________________________
- Page 169 and 170: Annexe I __________________________
- Page 171 and 172: ANNEXE II ASSESSMENT OF PATTERNS OF
- Page 173 and 174: Annexe II _________________________
- Page 175 and 176: Annexe II _________________________
- Page 177 and 178: Annexe II _________________________
- Page 179 and 180: Annexe II _________________________
- Page 181: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 185 and 186: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 187 and 188: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 189 and 190: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 191 and 192: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 193 and 194: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 195 and 196: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 197 and 198: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 199 and 200: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 201 and 202: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 203 and 204: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 205 and 206: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 207 and 208: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 209 and 210: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 211 and 212: Annexe III ________________________
- Page 213 and 214: ANNEXE IV THE RIGHTING RESPONSE AS
- Page 215 and 216: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 217 and 218: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 219 and 220: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 221 and 222: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 223 and 224: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 225 and 226: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 227 and 228: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 229 and 230: Annexe IV _________________________
- Page 231 and 232: Annexe IV _________________________
Annexe III<br />
_____________________________________________<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
In oviparous sauropsids, hatching success and hatchling phenotype <strong>de</strong>pend greatly upon the<br />
environmental conditions, especially when females lays eggs in a subterranean nest cavity and<br />
abandon them, such as turtles and most crocodilians and squamate species do (Gutzke &<br />
Packard, 1987; Brooks et al., 1991; Shine & Harlow, 1997). In the absence of parental care,<br />
embryos and hatchlings are strongly affected by the physical conditions of the nest and<br />
particularly by the temperature and moisture within the nest (Ewert, 1985).<br />
Incubation thermal environment strongly influences embryonic growth rate (Pieau & Dorizzi,<br />
1981; Webb et al., 1987; Deeming & Ferguson, 1989; Georges et al., 2005), incubation length<br />
(Yntema, 1978), survival of embryos (Brooks et al., 1991) and even sex phenotype in species<br />
with temperature-<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt sex <strong>de</strong>termination (Bull, 1980; Janzen & Paukstis, 1991; Ewert,<br />
Jackson & Nelson, 1994). Variations in nest temperature also influence neonate morphology<br />
(Congdon, Fischer & Gatten, 1995; Brana & Ji, 2000; Ji & Du, 2001), physiology (Angilletta,<br />
Winters & Dunham, 2000; Demuth, 2001; Vanhooydonck et al., 2001; Blumberg, Lewis &<br />
Sokoloff, 2002; Lee et al., 2003), behavior (Shine et al., 1997; Burger, 1998; Nebeker &<br />
Bury, 2000) and survival (Brooks et al., 1991; Pepin, 1991) in diverse species. Despite the<br />
large amount of studies on the influence of temperature, this latter effect was often analyzed<br />
regardless of substrate moisture effects (Willingham, 2005). However, in natural nests,<br />
substrate moisture fluctuates greatly during the incubation period, in association with the<br />
pattern of atmospheric temperatures and precipitations (Packard et al., 1985; Bodie, Smith &<br />
Burke, 1996). These variations of water potential are particularly important for species that<br />
bury shallow nests as aquatic turtles, where eggs may encounter several drought and flooding<br />
events during incubation period (Moll & Legler, 1971; Plummer, 1976; Janzen, 1994; Kam,<br />
1994).<br />
2