Bulletin de liaison et d'information - Institut kurde de Paris
Bulletin de liaison et d'information - Institut kurde de Paris
Bulletin de liaison et d'information - Institut kurde de Paris
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Revue <strong>de</strong> Presse-Press Review-Berhevoka Çapê-Rivista Stampa-Dentro <strong>de</strong> la Prensa-Basm Öz<strong>et</strong>i<br />
MINORITY<br />
RIGHTS GROUP INTERNATIONAL<br />
The Kurds<br />
The Case of Akduvar v. Turkey<br />
On the evening of 10 November 1992 members of a<br />
'special team' of soldiers entered the village of<br />
Kelekci in south-east Turkey and instructed the mayor<br />
to evacuate all the inhabitants immediately. While the<br />
mayor attempted to call the people tog<strong>et</strong>her, the soldiers<br />
s<strong>et</strong> fire to a number of houses.<br />
Nine houses and their contents were burned to the<br />
ground. As a result, most of the inhabitants moved to<br />
Diyarbakir where some moved in with relatives. Others<br />
were left homeless. On 6 April 1993 the security forces<br />
r<strong>et</strong>urned to the village and s<strong>et</strong> fire to the rest of the<br />
houses. Kelekci, formerly a village of 500 inhabitants,<br />
has now been compl<strong>et</strong>ely evacuated.<br />
These events are common in south-east Turkey,<br />
where most Kurds live. The importance of Kelekci<br />
village is that nine villagers submitted their case to the<br />
European Court of Human Rights. They alleged that<br />
the buming of their houses was not an isolated inci<strong>de</strong>nt,<br />
but was part of a state policy of evacuating and<br />
<strong>de</strong>stroying Kurdish villages.<br />
On 16 September 1996, the European Court of<br />
Human Rights <strong>de</strong>livered its judgment. This was the<br />
first case involving the <strong>de</strong>struction of villages in southeast<br />
Turkey ever <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>d by the Court. The Court<br />
found against the Turkish state. In particular the<br />
Court held that:<br />
• on account of the burning of the applicants'<br />
housing by Turkish security forces, the Turkish<br />
state had violated the right of the applicants to<br />
private and family life (Article 8 of the<br />
European Convention on Human Rights);<br />
• the Turkish state had violated the applicants'<br />
right to the peaceful enjoyment of their property<br />
(Article 1 of the First Protocol to the<br />
Convention) ;<br />
• the Court further held that on account of the<br />
pressure put on applicants to withdraw their<br />
p<strong>et</strong>itions to the European Commission,<br />
Turkey was in violation of Article 25 (1) of the<br />
European Convention, which guarantees the<br />
right to individual p<strong>et</strong>ition.<br />
The phenomenon of the burning and <strong>de</strong>struction of<br />
villages in Turkey has been officially acknowledged.<br />
The regional governor of Diyarbakir has officially<br />
acknowledged that a total of 2,785 Kurdish s<strong>et</strong>tlements<br />
have been evacuated and <strong>de</strong>stroyed. Human<br />
rights organizations put the number of evacuated s<strong>et</strong>tlements<br />
at closer to 3,000, with about 3 million<br />
people displaced as a result. The govemment continues<br />
to <strong>de</strong>ny that Turkish security forces are responsible<br />
for these acts.<br />
Evacuation of Kelekci. semth-east Turkey, immediately<br />
after soldiers had <strong>de</strong>stroyed houses<br />
The enforced displacement of 3 million people has<br />
had tragic ht1\nan~ economic and en'vironmental consequences.<br />
The majority of those forced out of their<br />
homes and dispossessed move to large cities where<br />
they face acute housing problems and unemployment.<br />
Cities such as Adana, Batman, Diyarbakir, Mersin and<br />
Van are unahle to cope with the huge influx of people.<br />
The population of Diyarbakir, for example, has grown<br />
in five years from 380,000 in 1991 to 1.3 million in<br />
1996. Similarly, the population of Mersin grew from<br />
550,000 in 1992 to 1 million in 1994. This increase in<br />
population has resulted in increased levels of crime,<br />
epi<strong>de</strong>mics of bronchitis and pneumonia, the near-collapse<br />
of the schooling system, and sharp tensions with<br />
the original inhabitants of towns and cities like Adana<br />
and Diyarbakir.<br />
Quite apart from the brutality which accompanies<br />
many cases of eviction and <strong>de</strong>struction of villages. the<br />
state policy of forced evacuation causes long-term suffering<br />
for people forced to live in cramped and insecure<br />
conditions, <strong>de</strong>prived of their livelihood. their<br />
community and their way of life.<br />
(Information from Kurdish Hunum Rights Project.<br />
Akduvar v. Turkey; The Story of Kurdish Villagers<br />
Seeking Justice against Turkey, October 1996.)<br />
1