Sozialalmanach - Caritas Luxembourg

Sozialalmanach - Caritas Luxembourg Sozialalmanach - Caritas Luxembourg

19.07.2014 Views

In short, governments are in principle seeking to establish a “level playing field” for all. The worry is real that national governments will ultimately fall back to no small degree on the protection of their own national interests and the search for competitive advantages of their own financial centers. It is usually recognized that banks and other financial services providers have supported and promoted much past economic growth that ultimately benefits all. Innovation, excellence and flexibility in adjusting to rapidly changing circumstances have all played critical roles in the financial system’s performance. There is now however real concern that the structural reforms of the financial system, involving ever heavier regulation and oversight, will stymie the financial sector’s dynamism and reduce its ability to provide appropriate funds and impetus to non-financial activities worldwide. In other words, the emerging financial system, straddled by increased regulation and oversight under the aegis of pronounced international cooperation, will cause further drag to worldwide economic recovery. The duties of banks and other financial services providers The financial system has so far operated on the basis of assuming its legal duty without concern for the unintended consequences of its actions. The notion of ethical duty and its underpinning principles of integrity have so far held no sway in financial behavior. In fact, governments, investors, civil society bodies and the media have had much to say about the lack of fairness, transparency, responsibility and accountability in the undertakings of the financial system. Fairness, transparency, responsibility and accountability are in effect the core principles of integrity. The global financial sector must restore trust if it is to fully contribute to overcoming the crisis. Imposing “proper” financial behavior through law and regulation does nothing to restore banking reputation and the standing of the banks and other financial services providers. On the contrary, such rules, regulation and oversight simply highlight and emphasize the perceived willingness of both banks and other financial services providers to pursue corporate and personal gain at the expense of investors and all those other stakeholders directly or indirectly affected, if not afflicted, by the goings on of the financial system. For trust and reputation to be restored, there is need for a profound change in financial behavior. Business practices can no longer be driven just by legal duties. It requires banks and other financial services providers to embrace ethical duties based fully on the principles of integrity. In other words, the financial sector must shift to a mode of operation that involves the pursuit of social responsibility as captured in the ESG (environmental, social and governance) principles and promoted in particular in sustainable and responsible investments. 213

Corporate financial governance, with its key functions of audit and internal control, compliance and risk management, is at the heart of the shift in financial behavior and business practices. To no small degree, it is a top-down change in behavior and practices, starting with the board of directors. It profoundly involves a shift in duty from the purely legal and fiduciary to one encompassing the ethical and its principles of integrity. Otherwise, banking will remain in disrepute and disrepair. It will be further smothered in more and more regulation and oversight. This state of affair can only lead to stymied innovation and the financial system contributing poorly in overcoming the crisis and much less to the pursuit of economic recovery and growth. And where does that leave the financial system’s contribution to overcome the crisis? It does not augur well. Banks must rebuild their own capital in order to be able to weather future shocks to the financial system. And there will be future shocks due to the inevitable bubbles in overpriced assets and the nature of the business cycle. In the pursuit of the alleviation of systemic risk that leads to profound economic crises, there will be profound government-induced structural reforms to deal with the matter of “too big to fail” and its related issue of moral hazard. The scope and extent of such reforms are so far unknown, as are those of the regulatory and oversight reforms contemplated. We only know for sure that the reforms will ultimately be extensive and will otherwise require overcoming government obstacles due to the unavoidable conflicts in national interests. All that leaves the financial system, comprised of its banks and other financial services providers, facing great uncertainty as to the new rules of the game and its ability to maintain its competitiveness. While investment bank operations can expect to continue to reap, when the opportunities present themselves, huge profits in specific specialized markets, we can otherwise expect at best caution and prudence to generally prevail throughout the financial system. In other words, the financial system will behave on the whole with risk-aversion and forego initiatives that could otherwise add impetus to overcoming the crisis. Yes, the financial system will contribute to overcoming the crisis. It cannot do otherwise in its role of financial intermediary. The issue is that credit provided will not be willingly brought forward. In effect, the financial system can be expected to play essentially a passive role, responding to business needs in short and long term capital only when its banks and other financial services providers are fully assured that they will recover the moneys made available to support economic recovery and growth. 214

Corporate financial governance, with its key functions of audit and internal control,<br />

compliance and risk management, is at the heart of the shift in financial behavior and<br />

business practices. To no small degree, it is a top-down change in behavior and practices,<br />

starting with the board of directors. It profoundly involves a shift in duty from the purely<br />

legal and fiduciary to one encompassing the ethical and its principles of integrity.<br />

Otherwise, banking will remain in disrepute and disrepair. It will be further smothered<br />

in more and more regulation and oversight. This state of affair can only lead to stymied<br />

innovation and the financial system contributing poorly in overcoming the crisis and much<br />

less to the pursuit of economic recovery and growth.<br />

And where does that leave the financial system’s contribution<br />

to overcome the crisis?<br />

It does not augur well. Banks must rebuild their own capital in order to be able to<br />

weather future shocks to the financial system. And there will be future shocks due to the<br />

inevitable bubbles in overpriced assets and the nature of the business cycle.<br />

In the pursuit of the alleviation of systemic risk that leads to profound economic crises,<br />

there will be profound government-induced structural reforms to deal with the matter of<br />

“too big to fail” and its related issue of moral hazard. The scope and extent of such reforms<br />

are so far unknown, as are those of the regulatory and oversight reforms contemplated. We<br />

only know for sure that the reforms will ultimately be extensive and will otherwise require<br />

overcoming government obstacles due to the unavoidable conflicts in national interests.<br />

All that leaves the financial system, comprised of its banks and other financial services<br />

providers, facing great uncertainty as to the new rules of the game and its ability to maintain<br />

its competitiveness. While investment bank operations can expect to continue to reap, when<br />

the opportunities present themselves, huge profits in specific specialized markets, we can<br />

otherwise expect at best caution and prudence to generally prevail throughout the financial<br />

system. In other words, the financial system will behave on the whole with risk-aversion<br />

and forego initiatives that could otherwise add impetus to overcoming the crisis.<br />

Yes, the financial system will contribute to overcoming the crisis. It cannot do otherwise<br />

in its role of financial intermediary. The issue is that credit provided will not be willingly<br />

brought forward. In effect, the financial system can be expected to play essentially a passive<br />

role, responding to business needs in short and long term capital only when its banks and<br />

other financial services providers are fully assured that they will recover the moneys made<br />

available to support economic recovery and growth.<br />

214

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!