maenas (intertidal zone) and Segonzacia mesatlantica - Station ...
maenas (intertidal zone) and Segonzacia mesatlantica - Station ... maenas (intertidal zone) and Segonzacia mesatlantica - Station ...
190 CHAPITRE 5. ADAPTATIONS RESPIRATOIRES DE S. MESATLANTICA FIG. 5.6 – Hemocyanin complex proportion in Segonzacia mesatlantica hemolymph. (a) example of a SEC-MALLS profile obtained for a "high-dodecamer" sample ; (b) example of a SEC-MALLS profile obtained for a "high-hexamer" sample. Full line is the refractive index profile, dots are the calculated masses from the MALLS data. 18, 12, 6, octadecamer, dodecamer and hexamer peaks, respectively. (c) dodecamer and hexamer proportions under the different experimental conditions. Bars are average values ± standard deviations. c, control crabs, exp, experimental crabs, hypo, hypoxia, normo, normoxia. that the crabs are globally in good health (Tentori et Lockwood, 1990). For divalent cations, average calcium level is 13 mM ± 8 % and average magnesium level is 23 mM ± 18 % for all measured crabs (Figure 5.5c). These levels are thus relatively stable with a higher inter-individual variability for magnesium. Divalent cations are known to be potential modulators for Hc (Truchot, 1975). Lactate and urate are crucial Hc modulators in numerous crustacean species and are typical of an environmental and/or metabolic stress (Bridges, 2001). Lactate levels are high in all groups for Segonzacia mesatlantica, with values ranging from 1.85 to 11.9 mM and an average value of 4.21 mM ± 33 %. The variability between individuals is very high for two groups (normoxia 10°C control and hypoxia 20°C experimental groups) and relatively low in the other groups (Figure 5.5d). Urate levels exhibit a very strong interindividual variability, with values ranging from 34.5 to 601 µM and an average value of 191 µM ± 61 %. This variability is particularly high in hypoxia experimental groups (Figure 5.5d). In general, urate levels tend to be higher in the experimental groups (see later in the text for statistical analysis). The highest values observed for Segonzacia mesatlantica urate levels are very high compared to Carcinus maenas (maximum value for C. maenas 221 µM, observed in temperature and oxygenation stress experiments (Lallier, 1988)). Dodecamer and hexamer abundances were also determined by FPLC. A higher proportion of
5.4. MANUSCRIT : RESPIRATORY ADAPTATIONS OF S. MESATLANTICA 191 hexamer is visible in all samples compared to shallow water brachyurans (average hexamer proportion of 54 % for S. mesatlantica). This proportion varies from one crab to another, with values ranging from 33 to 66 % of Hc content. For Carcinus maenas fresh hemolymph, hexamer content is typically 5 to 20 % (personal observation). Figure 5.6 shows an example of a "high-hexamer" and a "low-hexamer" sample analyzed by FPLC. Canonical redundancy analysis of experimental effects The effect of experimental conditions was tested using RDA, a non-parametric method enabling to test if the multivariate response data from different experimental groups are significantly different, without a priori assumptions about normality. It also permits to produce graphical representations of the relationships between the response variables (in our case, 11 hemolymph variables) and the explanatory variables representing the experimental conditions (Legendre et Legendre, 1998, Legendre et Anderson, 1999). The analysis was performed on the table of 11 measured response variables for 44 crabs for which information without missing values was available (total protein, Hc, sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, L-lactate and urate concentrations, dodecamer, hexamer and 18-mer proportions). For each crab, the explanatory variables are the collection site, sex, size, number of thawings (some hemolymph samples were thawed once before analysis for another study on oxidative stress), experimental groups (one group for each of the 4 experiments ; in each group, the control crabs were dissected prior to acclimating the others), and experimental conditions (control or acclimated crab, temperature and oxygen levels if the crab was acclimated). The interaction between oxygen and temperature effects must be tested first. If it is significant, the main factors cannot be tested in a 2-way anova ; factor 1 has to be tested separately in each of the classes of factor 2 and conversely. If the interaction is not significant, we do not have to take it into account as a covariable in the tests involving the environmental variables. Coding variables were created to represent the oxygen and temperature treatments and control/acclimated status of each crab. A variable Control with mean 0 separated the 18 control crabs (coding value = 1/18) from the 26 acclimated animals (coding value = -1/26) ; a variable Oxygenation with mean 0 represented the 17 crabs submitted to hypoxia (coding value = -1/17), the 18 control crabs (coding value = 0), and the 9 animals subjected to normoxia (coding value = 1/9) ; and a variable Temperature with mean 0 represented the 10 crabs subjected to 10°C (coding value = -1/10), the 18 control crabs (coding value = 0), and the 16 animals subjected to 20°C (coding value = 1/16). An Interaction variable was created by multiplying the corresponding values of the oxygen and temperature treatment variables. Control was orthogonal (correlation r = 0) to the two variables representing the main factors, but because of
- Page 146 and 147: 140 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 148 and 149: 142 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 150 and 151: 144 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 152 and 153: 146 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 154 and 155: 148 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 156 and 157: 150 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 158 and 159: 152 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 160 and 161: 154 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 162 and 163: 156 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 164 and 165: 158 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 166 and 167: 160 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 168 and 169: 162 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 170 and 171: 164 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 172 and 173: Dénaturant Natif
- Page 174 and 175: 168 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 176 and 177: 170 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 178 and 179: 172 CHAPITRE 5. ADAPTATIONS RESPIRA
- Page 180 and 181: 174 CHAPITRE 5. ADAPTATIONS RESPIRA
- Page 182 and 183: 176 CHAPITRE 5. ADAPTATIONS RESPIRA
- Page 184 and 185: 178 CHAPITRE 5. ADAPTATIONS RESPIRA
- Page 186 and 187: 180 CHAPITRE 5. ADAPTATIONS RESPIRA
- Page 188 and 189: 182 CHAPITRE 5. ADAPTATIONS RESPIRA
- Page 190 and 191: 184 CHAPITRE 5. ADAPTATIONS RESPIRA
- Page 192 and 193: 186 CHAPITRE 5. ADAPTATIONS RESPIRA
- Page 194 and 195: 188 CHAPITRE 5. ADAPTATIONS RESPIRA
- Page 198 and 199: 192 CHAPITRE 5. ADAPTATIONS RESPIRA
- Page 200 and 201: 194 CHAPITRE 5. ADAPTATIONS RESPIRA
- Page 202 and 203: 196 CHAPITRE 5. ADAPTATIONS RESPIRA
- Page 204 and 205: 198 CHAPITRE 5. ADAPTATIONS RESPIRA
- Page 206 and 207: 200 CHAPITRE 5. ADAPTATIONS RESPIRA
- Page 208 and 209: 202 CHAPITRE 5. ADAPTATIONS RESPIRA
- Page 210 and 211: 204 CHAPITRE 5. ADAPTATIONS RESPIRA
- Page 212 and 213: 206 CHAPITRE 5. ADAPTATIONS RESPIRA
- Page 214 and 215: 208 CHAPITRE 5. ADAPTATIONS RESPIRA
- Page 216 and 217: 210 CHAPITRE 5. ADAPTATIONS RESPIRA
- Page 218 and 219: 212 CHAPITRE 5. ADAPTATIONS RESPIRA
- Page 220 and 221: 214 CHAPITRE 5. ADAPTATIONS RESPIRA
- Page 222 and 223: 216 CHAPITRE 6. CONCLUSION ET PERSP
- Page 224 and 225: 218 CHAPITRE 6. CONCLUSION ET PERSP
- Page 226 and 227: 220 CHAPITRE 6. CONCLUSION ET PERSP
- Page 228 and 229: 222 CHAPITRE 6. CONCLUSION ET PERSP
- Page 230 and 231: 224 CHAPITRE 6. CONCLUSION ET PERSP
- Page 233 and 234: Annexe A Détermination des masses
- Page 235 and 236: 229 10000 h280 .M h) h280−h337 80
- Page 237 and 238: Annexe B Détermination des distrib
- Page 239 and 240: 233 Modèle 2 : 2 sous-unités lég
- Page 241 and 242: 235 1 0.9 0.8 6 s-u aléatoires 2 s
- Page 243 and 244: Bibliographie Adair, G. S. The hemo
- Page 245 and 246: BIBLIOGRAPHIE 239 Catalina, M. I.,
5.4. MANUSCRIT : RESPIRATORY ADAPTATIONS OF S. MESATLANTICA 191<br />
hexamer is visible in all samples compared to shallow water brachyurans (average hexamer proportion<br />
of 54 % for S. <strong>mesatlantica</strong>). This proportion varies from one crab to another, with values ranging from<br />
33 to 66 % of Hc content. For Carcinus <strong>maenas</strong> fresh hemolymph, hexamer content is typically 5 to<br />
20 % (personal observation). Figure 5.6 shows an example of a "high-hexamer" <strong>and</strong> a "low-hexamer"<br />
sample analyzed by FPLC.<br />
Canonical redundancy analysis of experimental effects<br />
The effect of experimental conditions was tested using RDA, a non-parametric method enabling<br />
to test if the multivariate response data from different experimental groups are significantly different,<br />
without a priori assumptions about normality. It also permits to produce graphical representations of<br />
the relationships between the response variables (in our case, 11 hemolymph variables) <strong>and</strong> the explanatory<br />
variables representing the experimental conditions (Legendre et Legendre, 1998, Legendre<br />
et Anderson, 1999).<br />
The analysis was performed on the table of 11 measured response variables for 44 crabs for which<br />
information without missing values was available (total protein, Hc, sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium,<br />
L-lactate <strong>and</strong> urate concentrations, dodecamer, hexamer <strong>and</strong> 18-mer proportions). For each<br />
crab, the explanatory variables are the collection site, sex, size, number of thawings (some hemolymph<br />
samples were thawed once before analysis for another study on oxidative stress), experimental<br />
groups (one group for each of the 4 experiments ; in each group, the control crabs were dissected prior<br />
to acclimating the others), <strong>and</strong> experimental conditions (control or acclimated crab, temperature <strong>and</strong><br />
oxygen levels if the crab was acclimated).<br />
The interaction between oxygen <strong>and</strong> temperature effects must be tested first. If it is significant,<br />
the main factors cannot be tested in a 2-way anova ; factor 1 has to be tested separately in each of<br />
the classes of factor 2 <strong>and</strong> conversely. If the interaction is not significant, we do not have to take it<br />
into account as a covariable in the tests involving the environmental variables. Coding variables were<br />
created to represent the oxygen <strong>and</strong> temperature treatments <strong>and</strong> control/acclimated status of each<br />
crab. A variable Control with mean 0 separated the 18 control crabs (coding value = 1/18) from the<br />
26 acclimated animals (coding value = -1/26) ; a variable Oxygenation with mean 0 represented the<br />
17 crabs submitted to hypoxia (coding value = -1/17), the 18 control crabs (coding value = 0), <strong>and</strong><br />
the 9 animals subjected to normoxia (coding value = 1/9) ; <strong>and</strong> a variable Temperature with mean 0<br />
represented the 10 crabs subjected to 10°C (coding value = -1/10), the 18 control crabs (coding value<br />
= 0), <strong>and</strong> the 16 animals subjected to 20°C (coding value = 1/16). An Interaction variable was created<br />
by multiplying the corresponding values of the oxygen <strong>and</strong> temperature treatment variables. Control<br />
was orthogonal (correlation r = 0) to the two variables representing the main factors, but because of