maenas (intertidal zone) and Segonzacia mesatlantica - Station ...
maenas (intertidal zone) and Segonzacia mesatlantica - Station ... maenas (intertidal zone) and Segonzacia mesatlantica - Station ...
120 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC DE C. MAENAS PAR ESI-MS FIG. 3.5 – Acidic reassociation of Carcinus maenas hemocyanin by formic acid. Left part, mass spectra of a whole hemolymph sample dissociated in 10 mM AcNH4, 0.03 % TEA and acidified with increasing quantities of formic acid (0, 0.004, 0.0045 and 0.04 % formic acid for pH 8.55, 7.94, 7.7 and 4.22, respectively). For pH 4.22, the isoelectric point is passed since a precipitate forms for slightly higher pH values. m, monomers peaks, h, hexamer peaks (450 kDa), d, dodecamer peaks (900 kDa), dl, light dodecamer peaks (885 kDa). Right part, focus for each mass spectrum on the 4300-4600 m/z range, in which the 17 H+ charged peak of each monomer is expected. The presence or absence of each dissociated subunit can be determined by examining the peaks visible in this m/z range.
3.2. MANUSCRIT : STRUCTURAL STUDY OF C. MAENAS HC BY ESI-MS 121 Reassociation by L-lactic acid L-lactic acid also induced a partial reassociation of the subunits into complexes, as observed with formic acid (figure 3.6). The main complex observed is the light dodecamer, with a relative intensity higher that in the case of formic acid reassociation. A preferential mobilization of the lightest subunits is observed again, which is consistent with the appearance of light dodecamer. While this preferential recruitment is also observed with formic acid, there is an important difference since L-lactic acid induces an immediate disappearance of the two light subunits (Cm1 and Cm2) as soon as it is added, even if the pH is maintained over 8.4. This specific and immediate effect contrasts with the progressive effect observed with formic acid. Cm1 and Cm2 remain undetectable at pH 5.9, over the isoelectric point. Experiments on purified complexes (dodecamers and hexamers) Dissociation/reassociation experiments were performed on purified complexes, using formic acid as the acidifying agent. Figure 3.7 presents the results obtained for purified dodecamers and hexamers. In both cases, dissociation is induced at alkaline pH. When pH is returned to 7.5, dissociated dodecamer subunits reassociate partially into dodecamers and light dodecamers (a very small signal for hexamers is also visible) whereas dissociated hexamer subunits only reassociate up to hexamers and no dodecamers is formed. Hexamers were not fully dissociated upon alkalinization ; however for dodecamers also the efficiency of the dissociation could vary from one experiment to another. Chelation of divalent cations by EDTA When divalent cations are removed by EDTA washing after alkaline dissociation of whole hemolymph preparation, returning to pH 7.52 by washing with a 10 mM AcNH4, 0.005 % TEA solution induces a partial reassociation mainly into hexamers and to a lesser extent into dodecamers (figure 3.8). Interestingly, all dissociated monomers peaks disappear upon reassociation except for the 4450 peak corresponding to the subunit specific of the dodecameric assembly. Addition of L-lactic acid to the sample after removal of EDTA still resulted in the disappearance of the lightest subunits peaks (figure 3.8). No major dissociation into hexamers or monomers was observed upon addition of EDTA at neutral pH (data not shown).
- Page 76 and 77: 70 CHAPITRE 2. ESI-MS ET MALLS APPL
- Page 78 and 79: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 80 and 81: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 82 and 83: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 84 and 85: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 86 and 87: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 88 and 89: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 90 and 91: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 92 and 93: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 94 and 95: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 96 and 97: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 98 and 99: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 100 and 101: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 102 and 103: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 104 and 105: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 106 and 107: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 108 and 109: 102 CHAPITRE 2. ESI-MS ET MALLS APP
- Page 110 and 111: 104 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 112 and 113: 106 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 114 and 115: 108 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 116 and 117: 110 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 118 and 119: 112 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 120 and 121: 114 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 122 and 123: 116 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 124 and 125: 118 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 128 and 129: 122 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 130 and 131: 124 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 132 and 133: 126 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 134 and 135: 128 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 136 and 137: 130 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 138 and 139: 132 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 140 and 141: 134 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 142 and 143: 136 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 144 and 145: 138 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 146 and 147: 140 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 148 and 149: 142 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 150 and 151: 144 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 152 and 153: 146 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 154 and 155: 148 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 156 and 157: 150 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 158 and 159: 152 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 160 and 161: 154 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 162 and 163: 156 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 164 and 165: 158 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 166 and 167: 160 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 168 and 169: 162 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 170 and 171: 164 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 172 and 173: Dénaturant Natif
- Page 174 and 175: 168 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
3.2. MANUSCRIT : STRUCTURAL STUDY OF C. MAENAS HC BY ESI-MS 121<br />
Reassociation by L-lactic acid<br />
L-lactic acid also induced a partial reassociation of the subunits into complexes, as observed with<br />
formic acid (figure 3.6). The main complex observed is the light dodecamer, with a relative intensity<br />
higher that in the case of formic acid reassociation. A preferential mobilization of the lightest subunits<br />
is observed again, which is consistent with the appearance of light dodecamer. While this preferential<br />
recruitment is also observed with formic acid, there is an important difference since L-lactic acid<br />
induces an immediate disappearance of the two light subunits (Cm1 <strong>and</strong> Cm2) as soon as it is added,<br />
even if the pH is maintained over 8.4. This specific <strong>and</strong> immediate effect contrasts with the progressive<br />
effect observed with formic acid. Cm1 <strong>and</strong> Cm2 remain undetectable at pH 5.9, over the isoelectric<br />
point.<br />
Experiments on purified complexes (dodecamers <strong>and</strong> hexamers)<br />
Dissociation/reassociation experiments were performed on purified complexes, using formic acid<br />
as the acidifying agent. Figure 3.7 presents the results obtained for purified dodecamers <strong>and</strong> hexamers.<br />
In both cases, dissociation is induced at alkaline pH. When pH is returned to 7.5, dissociated<br />
dodecamer subunits reassociate partially into dodecamers <strong>and</strong> light dodecamers (a very small signal<br />
for hexamers is also visible) whereas dissociated hexamer subunits only reassociate up to hexamers<br />
<strong>and</strong> no dodecamers is formed. Hexamers were not fully dissociated upon alkalinization ; however for<br />
dodecamers also the efficiency of the dissociation could vary from one experiment to another.<br />
Chelation of divalent cations by EDTA<br />
When divalent cations are removed by EDTA washing after alkaline dissociation of whole hemolymph<br />
preparation, returning to pH 7.52 by washing with a 10 mM AcNH4, 0.005 % TEA solution<br />
induces a partial reassociation mainly into hexamers <strong>and</strong> to a lesser extent into dodecamers (figure<br />
3.8). Interestingly, all dissociated monomers peaks disappear upon reassociation except for the 4450<br />
peak corresponding to the subunit specific of the dodecameric assembly. Addition of L-lactic acid to<br />
the sample after removal of EDTA still resulted in the disappearance of the lightest subunits peaks<br />
(figure 3.8). No major dissociation into hexamers or monomers was observed upon addition of EDTA<br />
at neutral pH (data not shown).