maenas (intertidal zone) and Segonzacia mesatlantica - Station ...
maenas (intertidal zone) and Segonzacia mesatlantica - Station ... maenas (intertidal zone) and Segonzacia mesatlantica - Station ...
118 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC DE C. MAENAS PAR ESI-MS FIG. 3.4 – Alkaline dissociation of Carcinus maenas hemocyanin by TEA. Left part, mass spectra of a whole hemolymph sample desalted in 10 mM AcNH4 with increasing quantities of TEA (0.005, 0.03 and 0.05 % TEA for pH 7.55, 8.55 and 9, respectively). m, monomers peaks, h, hexamer peaks (450 kDa), d, dodecamer peaks (900 kDa), dl, light dodecamer peaks (885 kDa). Right part, successive focuses on the monomers peak distributions. Six overlapping distributions can be observed. Masses obtained in non-covalent and denaturing conditions for each subunit are compared in table 1.
3.2. MANUSCRIT : STRUCTURAL STUDY OF C. MAENAS HC BY ESI-MS 119 Alkaline dissociation of complexes by TEA A native hemolymph sample was progressively dissociated in its constituting subunits by adding increasing quantities of TEA (figure 3.4). Before addition of TEA, one main species is observed and corresponds to a 900 kDa mass (dodecamer). A less intense signal is visible corresponding to a hexamer mass around 450 kDa and a slight monomer signal is also visible. It can be noted that the particular native sample shown here contains almost only dodecamers and only very few hexamers. Experiments on SEC-purified dodecamers and hexamers are detailed later. Upon TEA addition, the intensity of the dodecamer distribution decreases while the monomers peaks get more intense. A second distribution with higher m/z values is observed ; precise charge-state assignment is difficult for this due to the high mass of the complex. This distribution can correspond either to an 885 kDa or to an 864 kDa mass. Given that no subunit of 864/12 = 72 kDa is observed in denaturing conditions, this distribution can be identified unambiguously with the 885 kDa mass. This mass fits well with a dodecamer reassociated from the lightest subunits (below 74 kDa) produced by alkaline dissociation. The occurrence of this species before acidic reassociation suggests that a dynamic equilibrium between it and the free subunits exists as soon as dissociation of the dodecamers begins. Relative abundance of residual dodecamer after alkaline dissociation could vary slightly from one experiment to the other, but a massive dissociation was always observed. The monomer charge-state distributions can be examined to determine the different subunits which are present during the course of the dissociation (figure 3.4). Six main charge-state distributions are visible, corresponding to six subunits. The estimated masses are depicted in table 3.1. They could vary slightly from one experiment to another, but were almost always superior to the masses observed in denaturing conditions. Acidic reassociation of subunits by formic acid After alkaline dissociation of the complexes into their subunits, the preparation is acidified by progressive addition of formic acid (figure 3.5). The presence of dissociated subunits at various stages of the acidification process can be monitored by examining the distribution around m/z 4400, corresponding to the monomers with a 17 H+ charge. When pH decreases from 8.55 to 7.5, a progressive and partial reassociation into complexes is observed, mainly into light dodecamer (885 kDa) and dodecamer (900 kDa) complexes. In the meantime, a progressive disappearance of the Cm1 and Cm2 peaks corresponding to the lightest monomers suggests that these subunits are preferentially recruited for reassociation into complexes. When pH becomes strongly acidic (below the isoelectric point), complexes are dissociated anew and all subunits peaks are visible again.
- Page 74 and 75: 68 CHAPITRE 2. ESI-MS ET MALLS APPL
- Page 76 and 77: 70 CHAPITRE 2. ESI-MS ET MALLS APPL
- Page 78 and 79: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 80 and 81: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 82 and 83: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 84 and 85: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 86 and 87: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 88 and 89: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 90 and 91: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 92 and 93: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 94 and 95: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 96 and 97: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 98 and 99: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 100 and 101: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 102 and 103: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 104 and 105: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 106 and 107: The Structural Analysis of Large No
- Page 108 and 109: 102 CHAPITRE 2. ESI-MS ET MALLS APP
- Page 110 and 111: 104 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 112 and 113: 106 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 114 and 115: 108 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 116 and 117: 110 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 118 and 119: 112 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 120 and 121: 114 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 122 and 123: 116 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 126 and 127: 120 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 128 and 129: 122 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 130 and 131: 124 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 132 and 133: 126 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 134 and 135: 128 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 136 and 137: 130 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 138 and 139: 132 CHAPITRE 3. STRUCTURE DE L’HC
- Page 140 and 141: 134 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 142 and 143: 136 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 144 and 145: 138 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 146 and 147: 140 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 148 and 149: 142 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 150 and 151: 144 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 152 and 153: 146 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 154 and 155: 148 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 156 and 157: 150 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 158 and 159: 152 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 160 and 161: 154 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 162 and 163: 156 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 164 and 165: 158 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 166 and 167: 160 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 168 and 169: 162 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 170 and 171: 164 CHAPITRE 4. PLASTICITÉ PHÉNOT
- Page 172 and 173: Dénaturant Natif
3.2. MANUSCRIT : STRUCTURAL STUDY OF C. MAENAS HC BY ESI-MS 119<br />
Alkaline dissociation of complexes by TEA<br />
A native hemolymph sample was progressively dissociated in its constituting subunits by adding<br />
increasing quantities of TEA (figure 3.4). Before addition of TEA, one main species is observed<br />
<strong>and</strong> corresponds to a 900 kDa mass (dodecamer). A less intense signal is visible corresponding to a<br />
hexamer mass around 450 kDa <strong>and</strong> a slight monomer signal is also visible. It can be noted that the<br />
particular native sample shown here contains almost only dodecamers <strong>and</strong> only very few hexamers.<br />
Experiments on SEC-purified dodecamers <strong>and</strong> hexamers are detailed later. Upon TEA addition, the<br />
intensity of the dodecamer distribution decreases while the monomers peaks get more intense. A second<br />
distribution with higher m/z values is observed ; precise charge-state assignment is difficult for<br />
this due to the high mass of the complex. This distribution can correspond either to an 885 kDa or to<br />
an 864 kDa mass. Given that no subunit of 864/12 = 72 kDa is observed in denaturing conditions, this<br />
distribution can be identified unambiguously with the 885 kDa mass. This mass fits well with a dodecamer<br />
reassociated from the lightest subunits (below 74 kDa) produced by alkaline dissociation. The<br />
occurrence of this species before acidic reassociation suggests that a dynamic equilibrium between it<br />
<strong>and</strong> the free subunits exists as soon as dissociation of the dodecamers begins. Relative abundance of<br />
residual dodecamer after alkaline dissociation could vary slightly from one experiment to the other,<br />
but a massive dissociation was always observed.<br />
The monomer charge-state distributions can be examined to determine the different subunits<br />
which are present during the course of the dissociation (figure 3.4). Six main charge-state distributions<br />
are visible, corresponding to six subunits. The estimated masses are depicted in table 3.1. They<br />
could vary slightly from one experiment to another, but were almost always superior to the masses<br />
observed in denaturing conditions.<br />
Acidic reassociation of subunits by formic acid<br />
After alkaline dissociation of the complexes into their subunits, the preparation is acidified by progressive<br />
addition of formic acid (figure 3.5). The presence of dissociated subunits at various stages<br />
of the acidification process can be monitored by examining the distribution around m/z 4400, corresponding<br />
to the monomers with a 17 H+ charge. When pH decreases from 8.55 to 7.5, a progressive<br />
<strong>and</strong> partial reassociation into complexes is observed, mainly into light dodecamer (885 kDa) <strong>and</strong> dodecamer<br />
(900 kDa) complexes. In the meantime, a progressive disappearance of the Cm1 <strong>and</strong> Cm2<br />
peaks corresponding to the lightest monomers suggests that these subunits are preferentially recruited<br />
for reassociation into complexes. When pH becomes strongly acidic (below the isoelectric point),<br />
complexes are dissociated anew <strong>and</strong> all subunits peaks are visible again.