21.04.2014 Views

these simulation numerique et modelisation de l'ecoulement autour ...

these simulation numerique et modelisation de l'ecoulement autour ...

these simulation numerique et modelisation de l'ecoulement autour ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ARTIFICIAL VISCOSITY MODELS<br />

As a consequence, the only action of this mo<strong>de</strong>l is to put a lot of 2 nd or<strong>de</strong>r AV everywhere in the field.<br />

Moreover, this AV is applied on all transport variables (momentum, energy and species).<br />

This option produces highly non-physical results as it adds a lot of viscosity everywhere. It often leads<br />

to stationnary results which look very similar to RANS computations. It must never be used to produce<br />

LES results. This option can be used for example to initialise a computation, but even in this case, the<br />

“Jameson” mo<strong>de</strong>l should be preferred.<br />

A.4.2<br />

“Jameson” mo<strong>de</strong>l<br />

A “Jameson” sensor based on pressure is used in this case.<br />

ζ JAM = ζ J Ω j<br />

(P )<br />

(A.24)<br />

The amount of 2 nd or<strong>de</strong>r AV that is applied is directly proportional to this sensor. The amount of 4 th<br />

or<strong>de</strong>r AV also <strong>de</strong>pends on the sensor. Actually, the input param<strong>et</strong>ersmu4 is replaced by :<br />

smu4 ′ = max(0, smu4 − ζ JAM smu2)<br />

(A.25)<br />

This formulation allows to put 4 th or<strong>de</strong>r AV only where the sensor is small (as well as the amount of 2 nd<br />

or<strong>de</strong>r AV). On the other hand, if the sensor is large, it is no use to put 4 th or<strong>de</strong>r AV, because the 2 nd or<strong>de</strong>r<br />

AV operates fully and overcomes most of the problems.<br />

Both operators are applied on all variables (momentum, energy and species).<br />

This mo<strong>de</strong>l was originally proposed by Jameson and Turkel Jameson <strong>et</strong> al. (1981). It is very well<br />

suited for “aerodynamics” configurations, with shocks and without combustion, solved with a RANS<br />

solver. However it appears that for reacting LES, this mo<strong>de</strong>l is much too dissipative and must only be<br />

used during transient phases. It allows to stabilise a computation when non-physical processes of high<br />

amplitu<strong>de</strong>s happen (at the initialisation phase for example). However, for LES <strong>simulation</strong>s we recommend<br />

the use of the “Colin” mo<strong>de</strong>l.<br />

A.4.3<br />

“Colin” mo<strong>de</strong>l<br />

Three sensors are used here in conjunction. The first one is based on total energy, the second one is<br />

based on species <strong>de</strong>nsities, and the last one is the maximum of the two previous.<br />

ζE COL = ζΩ C j<br />

(ρE), ζY COL = max<br />

k=1,neqs ζC Ω j<br />

(ρ k ) and ζmax<br />

COL<br />

= max(ζE<br />

COL , ζY COL ) (A.26)<br />

The way <strong>these</strong> operators are combined and applied is a little bit tricky.<br />

L<strong>et</strong>’s begin by the AV on the species. As for the Jameson mo<strong>de</strong>l, we build a modified coefficient for the<br />

4 th or<strong>de</strong>r operator, but this time it is based on the maximum sensor ζ COL<br />

max :<br />

smu4 ′ = max(0, smu4 − ζ COL<br />

max smu2) (A.27)<br />

200

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!