28.02.2014 Views

ARBEITSGEMEINSCHAFT DER INSTITUTE FÜR ... - HAL - INRIA

ARBEITSGEMEINSCHAFT DER INSTITUTE FÜR ... - HAL - INRIA

ARBEITSGEMEINSCHAFT DER INSTITUTE FÜR ... - HAL - INRIA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SUMMARY<br />

Trophallaxis of worker honey bees in smafl groups and colonies<br />

Colonies of eusocial insects are often characterized by dominance hierarchies.<br />

In colonies of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) the dominant individual is the<br />

queen whereas the workers are thought to be a subordinate caste (W ILSO rr,<br />

1975).<br />

KoRST &<br />

VELTHU IS (1982), however, have shown that dominance hierarchies<br />

among workers (A.m. capensis ESCH.) exist under queenless conditions.<br />

Dominant workers develop their ovaries faster, produce more eggs, and more<br />

9-Oxo-2-decenoic acid, the main component of the queen substance. Therefore<br />

these dominant bees have a greater genetic fitness than subordinates (MORITZ &<br />

HILLESHEIM , 1985). These characters are correlated with trophallactic behaviour<br />

in laboratory experiments, i.e. subordinate workers in a small group (3 standard<br />

bees and 1 test bee of the same age - 2 days old) offer food to the standard bees<br />

while dominant workers are fed.<br />

Here we studied whether the feeding hierarchy under laboratory conditions<br />

reflects a general trophallactic behaviour which can also be found in colonies.<br />

Trophallaxis of workers of 7 different lines was tested in small groups in the<br />

laboratory test. The ratio of dominant feeding acts to the total of observed feeding<br />

acts of the test bee was determined and the degree of dominance was evaluated<br />

according to MORIT Z & Htt,LesHEtM (1985). Workers of the same lines were then<br />

tested in one queenright observation hive. In contrast to the tests in small groups,<br />

test bees were exposed to the socially complex and environmentally more heterogeneous<br />

conditions in the colony. Nevertheless the genotypic correlation between<br />

the trophallactic behaviour in the small group and in the hive resulted in r 0.82<br />

=<br />

(p 0.05).<br />

=<br />

It could be shown that besides the age effect (FREE, 1957), there were also<br />

genetic factors determining trophallactic behaviour of worker bees in queenright<br />

colonies. Genetic variance might be an additional factor regulating division of<br />

labour in honey bee colonies in general.<br />

Acknowledgerrrent : Financial support was given by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinsch.tf:<br />

(grant KO 400/6-1).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!