Rapport de Campagne - Station Biologique de Roscoff
Rapport de Campagne - Station Biologique de Roscoff Rapport de Campagne - Station Biologique de Roscoff
COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER SUR UN NAVIRE Ifremer H OP E 99 URM 7 Nom : HERRING Prénom : Peter Campagne : HOPE 99 Navire : L'ATALANTE - Submersible: NAUTILE Organisme maître d'oeuvre : URM 7 Chef de mission : F. LALLIER Première partie: du 9 au 26 avril 1999 Participants associés: Ben BOORMAN Institution : SOUTHAMPTON OCEANOGRAPHY David EDGE CENTRE, UK Rappel des Objectifs The programme of trawling with the RMT system was aimed at identifing the fauna in the water column immediately above the 13° N active sites. This would show whether any of the mobile fauna seen at the sites during the submersible dives, or their larvae, extended upwards into the overlying water column. Travaux réalisés Twelve nighttime trawls were achieved, each with three sets of nets. Ten trawls were along the ridge axis over the active sites: 2 of these covered the depths from the surface to 1500m, 2 were between 2000and 2400m, 3 sampled at 2400-2500m, 1 at 2500-2550m and 2 were fished ~50m above the bottom. Net 2 was always open as the trawl passed over the main region of active sites. Two samples were lost through technical problems but 28 were successfully achieved. Two off-axis trawls were made, for comparison with the tows down the ridge. One was fished across the ridge and the other was in deeper water several km to the west of the ridge. Both were fished at the same depth as the main trawls along the ridge axis (2400- 2500m). Exploitation à terre The RMT8 samples will be sorted and the major faunal components identified. The catches of net 2 and of nets 1 and 3 will be compared to see if there is any clear influence of the active sites on the respective samples. Biomass determinations will be made on the basis of displacement volume. The RMT1 samples will be examined for the larger larval forms. The pelagic fauna over the EPR will then be compared with that over the MAR sites, sampled in 1997 during the MARVEL and FLAME cruises. Commentaires The first impressions of the trawl samples are that they comprise a typical bathypelagic fauna, and that the active hydrothermal sites have little influence on the fauna above them. Even the two trawls fished perilously close to the bottom (closest approach was ~25m) lacked any obvious components derived from the vent fauna. Despite the presence of many Lebbeus at some locations, none were taken in any of the nets. However, 2 specimens of Nematocarcinus sp. were taken, superficially similar to the species observed during several dives. Juveniles of vent-associated animals included several postlarval macrurids and three very young specimens of a cirrate octopod. HOPE 99 Page 189 RAPPORTS SCIENTIFIQUES
COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER SUR UN NAVIRE Ifremer The catches close to the bottom were consistently very small, with very few fish or pelagic decapods. Nemertine worms are a feature of both the EPR and MAR samples, and some exceptionally large specimens were taken in the trawls. The overall indication is that the near-bottom biomass levels over the EPR are much lower than at Lucky Strike or Rainbow. The off-axis trawls made at similar depths but over deeper water produced somewhat larger samples and it is possible that the intrusion of the ridge into the water column actively reduces the bathypelagic fauna immediately above it. HOPE 99 Page 190 RAPPORTS SCIENTIFIQUES
- Page 1 and 2: Rapport de Campagne URM 7 Ifremer-C
- Page 3 and 4: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 5 and 6: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 7 and 8: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 9 and 10: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 11 and 12: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 13 and 14: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 15 and 16: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 17 and 18: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 19 and 20: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 21 and 22: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 23 and 24: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 25 and 26: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 27 and 28: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 29 and 30: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 31 and 32: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 33 and 34: Commentaires COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAG
- Page 35 and 36: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 37 and 38: Exploitation à terre COMPTE RENDU
- Page 39 and 40: Exploitation à terre - Faunistique
- Page 41: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 45 and 46: Travaux réalisés COMPTE RENDU DE
- Page 47 and 48: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 49 and 50: Exploitation à terre : COMPTE REND
- Page 51 and 52: Commentaires Navigation de l'engin
- Page 53 and 54: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 55 and 56: BOITE AXE COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE
- Page 57 and 58: BOITE OUEST COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGN
- Page 59 and 60: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 61 and 62: Exploitation à terre COMPTE RENDU
- Page 63 and 64: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 65 and 66: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 67 and 68: Exploitation à terre COMPTE RENDU
- Page 69 and 70: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 71 and 72: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 73 and 74: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 75 and 76: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 77 and 78: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 79 and 80: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 81 and 82: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 83 and 84: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 85 and 86: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 87 and 88: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 89 and 90: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
- Page 91 and 92: COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER S
COMPTE RENDU DE CAMPAGNE A LA MER SUR UN NAVIRE Ifremer<br />
The catches close to the bottom were consistently very small, with very few fish or<br />
pelagic <strong>de</strong>capods. Nemertine worms are a feature of both the EPR and MAR samples, and<br />
some exceptionally large specimens were taken in the trawls. The overall indication is that the<br />
near-bottom biomass levels over the EPR are much lower than at Lucky Strike or Rainbow.<br />
The off-axis trawls ma<strong>de</strong> at similar <strong>de</strong>pths but over <strong>de</strong>eper water produced somewhat larger<br />
samples and it is possible that the intrusion of the ridge into the water column actively<br />
reduces the bathypelagic fauna immediately above it.<br />
HOPE 99 Page 190 RAPPORTS SCIENTIFIQUES