14.10.2013 Views

Journal of Film Preservation - FIAF

Journal of Film Preservation - FIAF

Journal of Film Preservation - FIAF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Comedies, and comedy-dramas: It’s a Wonderful Life, Buck Privates, Road<br />

to Morocco, Caught in the Draft, The Miracle <strong>of</strong> Morgan’s Creek, Hail the<br />

Conquering Hero, It’s in the Bag, To Be or Not to Be, Life with Father, Woman<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Year, Adam’s Rib, Born Yesterday, Heaven Can Wait, Miracle on 34th Street, The Bells <strong>of</strong> St. Mary’s, Gong My Way<br />

Social consciousness films: Gentleman’s Agreement, Pinky, Intruder in the<br />

Dust, The Boy With Green Hair, The Lost Weekend, The Ox-Bow Incident,<br />

The Snake Pit<br />

Westerns: Fort Apache, Billy the Kid, The Outlaw, Three Godfathers, Red<br />

River, Mule Train, Don’t Fence Me In, The Gunslinger<br />

Dramas, mysteries, biographies & film noir: Citizen Kane, Treasure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Sierra Madre, Casablanca, Sergeant York, The Maltese Falcon, The Song <strong>of</strong><br />

Bernadette, The Yearling, Watch on the Rhine, The Heiress, Double Indemnity,<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> the Past, Mildred Pierce, Madame Curie, For Whom the Bell Tolls.<br />

Random Harvest, Pride <strong>of</strong> the Yankees, King’s Row, Talk <strong>of</strong> the Town, All<br />

About Eve, A Letter to Three Wives, How Green Was My Valley<br />

A Reply to Gillian Anderson<br />

Stephen Bottomore<br />

This text has been sent by Stephen Bottomore as a reply to the article Preserving our<br />

<strong>Film</strong> Heritage or Making Mongrels? The Presentation <strong>of</strong> Early (Not Silent) <strong>Film</strong>s published<br />

in <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Film</strong> <strong>Preservation</strong> #57, in December 1998.<br />

I was glad to read Gillian Anderson’s views on the aesthetics <strong>of</strong> original<br />

versus modern scores for silent films, as I substantially agree with the<br />

thrust <strong>of</strong> her argument. Clearly many modern scores for silent films are<br />

more elaborate (‘sculpted to every second <strong>of</strong> the image’, as she puts it)<br />

than those <strong>of</strong> the time. We owe a debt <strong>of</strong> gratitude to Ms Anderson who<br />

has the musical expertise (rare in film historians) to demonstrate this difference.<br />

If we want an authentic experience when viewing silent films we<br />

should indeed question this overegging <strong>of</strong> the pudding.<br />

However, I must take issue with Gillian Anderson on a couple <strong>of</strong> points.<br />

Firstly, while it is true that Gorky (not Gogol) was puzzled and disturbed<br />

by the lack <strong>of</strong> sound in the Lumière films which he viewed in 1896, it is<br />

not certain that there was no musical accompaniment. The entertainment<br />

venue <strong>of</strong> Aumont’s might well have <strong>of</strong>fered incidental music. Gorky<br />

simply noticed that the images lacked the sound effects and voices that<br />

one would expect <strong>of</strong> the scenes in real life.<br />

More importantly I would like to challenge Ms Anderson’s suggestion<br />

that we should call silent films ‘early films’. This simply will not do. The<br />

term ‘early film’ has come to refer to approximately the first 20 years <strong>of</strong><br />

cinema, that is from about 1895 to 1915 (with a possible extension to<br />

109 <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Film</strong> <strong>Preservation</strong> / 58/59 / 1999<br />

Réponse de Stephen<br />

Bottomore à Gillian<br />

Anderson<br />

Suite à l'article paru dans le<br />

<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Film</strong> <strong>Preservation</strong><br />

N° 57, déc. 1998, Stephen<br />

Bottomore remercie Gillian<br />

Anderson de son engagement<br />

dans la polémique sur<br />

l'utilisation des partitions<br />

originales pour les films muets<br />

et de relancer ainsi le débat sur<br />

le caractère silencieux - ou non -<br />

des séances des films Lumière et<br />

sur l'utilisation, selon lui,<br />

discutable des termes “films<br />

muets” et “films des premiers<br />

temps” par Madame Gillian<br />

Anderson.<br />

Letters / Courrier / Correo

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!