17.08.2013 Views

Revue internationale d'écologie méditerranéenne International ...

Revue internationale d'écologie méditerranéenne International ...

Revue internationale d'écologie méditerranéenne International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PHENOTYPIC AND PHENOLOGICAL BEHAVIOURS OF CLONES OF NATURAL POPULATIONS OF ATRIPLEX HALIMUS ◆<br />

watered at the same rate for four months to aid in their<br />

establishment, and then not watered at all. In one of these<br />

parcels, clones have been irrigated in a continuous way at<br />

a rate of once per week (5 liters / individual). Individuals<br />

were monitored weekly to determine their phenological<br />

stage. The beginning of every phenological stage was<br />

noted when more than 70% of individuals presented<br />

specific features (floral buds, flowering and fruiting).<br />

In September of 2001 and 2002, five inflorescences of<br />

each individual were harvested following the four cardinal<br />

orientations. For each inflorescence, the length of inflorescence<br />

(LI), the number of secondary ramifications in<br />

every inflorescence (NR) and the number of male (MF)<br />

and female (FF) flowers formed were determined. The<br />

maximum height (H max), the maximum (CW max) and<br />

minimum (CW min) crown diameter, the circumference<br />

(Cir) and the number of inflorescences (IN) for each<br />

individual Were also measured only during the first year<br />

(2001). On November of the years (2001, 2002) fruits<br />

were collected from each individuals. For every one, we<br />

estimated the percent of fruits infested with insect (IR),<br />

the percent of immature seed (IS) and dry weight of 100<br />

seeds chosen randomly (SW).<br />

The data were analysed using SPSS for Windows analysis<br />

(SPSS, 1994). The multivariate analysis of variance<br />

ecologia mediterranea, tome 29, fascicule 2, 2003, p. 179-188<br />

was used (ANOVA). The main effects population (3),<br />

year (2), treatment (2) and individuals (30) were treated<br />

as a fixed factors. P < 0.05 was used to define statistical<br />

significance. If a significant difference was determined<br />

among means, a Student-Neuman-Keuls (SNK) test was<br />

used to determine significant difference between pairwise<br />

comparison between treatment. The percent data were<br />

arcsine transformed before analysis to ensure homogeneity<br />

of variance.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Phenological variability<br />

Direct observations showed that individuals of the<br />

three populations placed in the same climatic conditions<br />

exhibited variable phenology. Floral buds formation, in<br />

both irrigated and non-irrigated individuals was earlier<br />

for the Idelssen population (mid June), and late for those<br />

of Marrakech and Sidi Bouzid populations (end of June).<br />

However, the bursting of these floral buds is earlier for<br />

individuals of Sidi Bouzid and Marrakech populations.<br />

These floral buds generally give rise to male flowers (protandrous<br />

species). The female flowers appeared around<br />

F<br />

Source of variance df MF FF MF/FF LI NR<br />

Population 2 668.70*** 254.76*** 688.91*** 580.32*** 176.85***<br />

Year 1 0.235 0.000 1.27 0.000 0.04<br />

Treatment 1 8382.7*** 6701.85*** 1267.4*** 7060.41*** 2332.56***<br />

Individual 29 3.005*** 3.47*** 1.4 5.23*** 4.36***<br />

Population by Year 2 0.044 0.001 1.445 0.000 11.96***<br />

Population by treatment. 2 934.51*** 690.92*** 708.94*** 178.07*** 50.96***<br />

Population by Individual 1 2.92*** 4.19*** 6.706*** 5.19*** 3.187***<br />

Year by treatment 58 0.555 0.001 1.665 0.000 0.502<br />

Year by individual 29 0.612 0.000 0.513 0.000 0.802<br />

Treatment by Individual . 29 3.103*** 3.068*** 1.999** 5.93*** 5.53***<br />

Population by Year by treatment 2 0.434 0.000 7.105*** 0.000 0.933<br />

Population by year by individual 58 0.546 0.001 0.606 0.000 0.830<br />

Population by treatment by individual 58 3.268*** 4.803*** 6.968*** 4.979*** 2.743***<br />

Year by treatment by individual 29 0.583 0.000 0.599 0.000 0.935<br />

Population by year by treatment by individual. 58 0.636 0.001 0.712 0.000 0.843<br />

** (P < 0.01); *** (P < 0.001).<br />

Table 2. Analyse of variance of flowering parameters (number of male (MF) and female flowers (FF),<br />

floral sex ratio (MF/FF), length of inflorescence (LI) and number of secondary ramification per inflorescence (NR)).<br />

181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!