Revue internationale d'écologie méditerranéenne International ...
Revue internationale d'écologie méditerranéenne International ...
Revue internationale d'écologie méditerranéenne International ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
INTRODUCTION<br />
ecologia mediterranea, tome 29, fascicule 2, 2003, p. 153-164<br />
INTERPRETING GERMINATION RESULTS BASED ON SEED SIZE, MASS AND ECOLOGICAL… ◆<br />
Most studies on the evolution or ecological significance<br />
of seed size begin with two observations. Firstly,<br />
across the global flora, seed size varies over some 10<br />
orders of magnitude, and secondly, within species, seed<br />
size is remarkably constant (Harper et al., 1970; Silvertown,<br />
1989). An explanation for the apparent constancy<br />
within species was provided by the theoretical treatment<br />
of Smith and Fretwell (1974), who assumed that a plant<br />
has fixed amount of resources to allocate for reproduction<br />
(reproductive efforts) and that a decision must therefore<br />
be made concerning both the number and size of the<br />
offspring.<br />
Differences in seed size among species may represent<br />
an adaptation to different types of micro-sites<br />
(Silvertown, 1989). If species compete for establishment<br />
sites, large seeded species must have some advantage<br />
to counterbalance the reduction in their seed production<br />
(Lindsay et al., 1999). This advantage could take a<br />
number of forms: (i) small-seeded species could suffer<br />
higher levels of predation, (ii) large-seeded species being<br />
the best competitor for all sites, (iii) safe-micro-sites<br />
for the large-seeded species being much more frequent<br />
than those for small-seeded species. The latter form is<br />
in agreement with numerous experimental studies that<br />
have shown that larger-seeded species are better able to<br />
establish and survive under a wide range of conditions<br />
(Westoby et al., 1997).<br />
There are a number of arguments as to why large<br />
seeds should be advantageous in low moisture conditions.<br />
Baker (1972) and Salisbury (1975) argued that the large<br />
seed weight may enable the seedling to allocate proportionately<br />
more to root development and so produce<br />
extensive root system quickly. For example, in Central<br />
Australia seedlings issued from larger seeds had larger<br />
roots up to 10 days after germination than seedlings from<br />
smaller seeds of 32 species (Jurado & Westoby, 1992).<br />
Several studies have shown that intra-specific mortality<br />
rates in the field are higher for smaller seedlings under<br />
water stress (Parker, 1982; Cook, 1980). Thus, the larger<br />
root systems of seedlings from large seeds may provide<br />
an advantage by allowing access to soil moisture at<br />
deeper levels. The final argument concerning the likely<br />
advantage of large seed size concerns the energetic cost<br />
of tolerating low moisture conditions. Large seeds provide<br />
a larger metabolic reserve for seedlings than small seeds.<br />
Morphological and physiological characteristics, which<br />
confirm drought tolerance, are energetically expensive, so<br />
that the probability of establishment in low soil moisture<br />
155