17.08.2013 Views

1 - Ecologia Mediterranea

1 - Ecologia Mediterranea

1 - Ecologia Mediterranea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Bergmeier<br />

Fine-scale species composition<br />

The total number of spring-reproducing taxa was<br />

only slightly higher in the grazed microplots - 91 as<br />

against 86 (table 4). The mean number of taxa per<br />

microplot, however, was significantiy higher in the<br />

non-grazed plots (15.3 as against 19.5; t-Test with p <<br />

0.001). The same was true for the total and mean<br />

numbers of reproduction units.<br />

Post-tire Grazed Non-grazed<br />

management (n = 50) (n = 50)<br />

Total number of taxa 91 86<br />

Mean number of taxa<br />

per microp1ot 15.3 19.5<br />

Total number of<br />

reproduction units 5397 6493<br />

Mean number of repr.<br />

units per microplot 107.9 129.9<br />

Table 4. Diversity characteristics of the microplots<br />

The quantitative analysis of the microplots reveals<br />

that certain taxa were promoted by non-grazing, others<br />

were not (figure 2). Particularly Asteraceae such as<br />

Picris altissima, Crepis commutata and Urospermum<br />

picroides were supported by non-grazing; as were<br />

certain legumes (Lotus peregrinus, Lotus edulis) and<br />

grasses (Avena barbata, Bromus intermedius, Hyparrhenia<br />

hirta). Similar results were detected concerning<br />

the reproduction units (table 5). On the other hand, a<br />

small number of taxa was affected by non-grazing.<br />

Valantia hispida and Galium murale displayed lower<br />

constancy as weIl as fewer individuals. Crepis cretica<br />

was also much less abundant in the non-grazed plots<br />

but so far maintained its high constancy. It should be<br />

emphasized that no taxon promoted by non-grazing is<br />

lacking completely on the grazed ground, and so far,<br />

the reverse is also true.<br />

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

Pre-tire vs post-tire<br />

In the present case study, fire had only little effects<br />

on the overall diversity of phrygana. AIready in the<br />

first post-fire spring the composition of herbaceous<br />

6<br />

Combined effects offire and grazing on phrygana<br />

taxa was almost identical to that of the pre-fire vegetation.<br />

This is in accordance with Bôhling (1994), but<br />

apparently not with Arianoutsou-Faraggitaki & Margaris<br />

(1981: 187; 1982) who found the ground "carpeted<br />

with annual and perennial herbaceous species<br />

rarely seen in the undisturbed sites". However, noth­<br />

ing in detail is said in the latter study about pre-fire<br />

species composition and vegetation structure, so one<br />

might assume a rather dense and species-poor scrub<br />

which supports a floristic post-fire flush (Arianoutsou<br />

& Margaris, 1981; Papavassiliou & Arianoutsou,<br />

1993). In the present study, only Lavatera bryoniifolia,<br />

and to a minor degree Asphodelus ramosus and<br />

Sarcopoterium spinosum, were stimulated after fire.<br />

The coverage of the herbaceous vegetation on the<br />

grazed ground was but slightly higher than before the<br />

fire. The dwarf shrub layer was destroyed completely<br />

and, after two years, the process of regeneration had<br />

only just started. While the unburned phrygana shrubs<br />

provide effective protection against soil erosion (Dieckmann<br />

et al., 1985), the post-fire phrygana is highly<br />

susceptible to erosion as long as the shrub layer did<br />

not regenerate.<br />

The pre-fire dwarf shrub layer was rather homogeneous<br />

with dominant Calicotome vil/osa and Coridothymus<br />

capitatus, and with sparse Sarcopoterium<br />

spinosum. The high proportion of seedlings of the<br />

latter species in the grazed post-fire vegetation (table<br />

3) suggested that the post-fire shrub layer, once reestablished,<br />

might be richer in Sarcopoterium than the<br />

pre-fire vegetation, at least temporarily. This is corroborated<br />

by numerous observations of Sarcopoterium<br />

dominating initial regeneration stages of phrygana<br />

(Raus, 1979; Arianoutsou-Faraggitaki & Margaris,<br />

1982; Arianoutsou-Faraggitaki, 1984; Bohling, 1994;<br />

Bergmeier, 1995). Sarcopoterium spinosum is known<br />

to be fire-promoted (Roy & Arianoutsou-Faraggitaki,<br />

1985), and there is evidence for its representation in<br />

seed banks of <strong>Mediterranea</strong>n dwarf scrub ecosystems<br />

(Litav & Orshan, 1971). Moreover, S. spinosum often<br />

regenerates by both seeding and resprouting, the latter<br />

strategy according to Papanastis (1977) chiefly in<br />

more humid regions.<br />

This flexible response may prove favourable under<br />

variable ecological conditions.<br />

ecologia mediterranea 23 (3/4) - 1997

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!