10.08.2013 Views

Télécharger le rapport (152 p.) - KCE

Télécharger le rapport (152 p.) - KCE

Télécharger le rapport (152 p.) - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

24 Urgences <strong>KCE</strong> reports vol. 19B<br />

General practitioners working in the emergency departments<br />

Gibney et al. investigated if care provided by general practitioners (GPs) to nonemergency<br />

patients, in a suburban ED using an informal triage system, differs significantly<br />

from care provided by usual ED staff 105 . One thousand eight hundred and seventy-eight<br />

patients participated. By comparison with usual ED staff, GPs prescribed significantly<br />

more often (percentage relative difference [% RD] = 12 [95% confidence interval = 1-<br />

23]) and referred more patients to hospital (% RD = 21 [95% CI = 9-33]). This is the<br />

first study to report that sessional GPs working in an ED utilize similar or more<br />

resources than usual ED staff. It emphasizes the need for the continued audit of<br />

initiatives that have been introduced into new settings.<br />

Walk-in centres<br />

Different forms of walk-in centres do exist in different countries. In the UK walk-in<br />

centres are walk in access organisations (no appointment needed) <strong>le</strong>d by nurses<br />

supported by software assessment, aiming at reducing the workload in GP and accident<br />

and emergency departments 106, 107 . The review of the literature, showed important<br />

distinctions in the concept of a walk-in centre in different countries. In some countries<br />

walk-in centres are <strong>le</strong>ad by doctors rather than nurses, in some countries walk-in<br />

centres stand in competition to the family doctor, some walk-in centres (Northern<br />

America and Australia) exclusively serve as an out-of-hours service. Users of walk-in<br />

centres in other countries tend to be a relatively affluent population of working age, and<br />

a different population from those using conventional general practice services. Walk-in<br />

centres are used particularly when other health services are closed. The prob<strong>le</strong>ms<br />

presented are mainly minor illnesses and minor injuries. Peop<strong>le</strong> choose this form of care<br />

mainly for reasons of convenience, and satisfaction with the service is generally high.<br />

The very limited evidence availab<strong>le</strong> suggests that walk-in centres provide care of<br />

reasonab<strong>le</strong> quality, but there is insufficient evidence to draw firm conclusions about the<br />

impact of walk-in centres on other healthcare services or the costs of such care. A<br />

potential danger of walk-in centres is that patients with serious illness present<br />

themselves to a walk-in centre instead of going to an emergency department.<br />

Chalder et al. 108 investigated the impact of NHS walk-in centres on the workload of<br />

local accident and emergency departments, general practices, and out of hours services<br />

using time series analysis. A reduction in consultations at emergency departments (-175<br />

(95% confidence interval -387 to 36) consultations per department per month) and<br />

general practices (-19.8 (-53.3 to 13.8) consultations per 1000 patients per month) close<br />

to walk-in centres became apparent, but these reductions were not statistically<br />

significant. Walk-in centres did not have any impact on consultations on out-of-hours<br />

services. The authors concluded that it will be necessary to assess the impact of walk-in<br />

centres in a larger number of sites and over a prolonged period, to determine whether<br />

they reduce the demand on other local NHS providers.<br />

Out-of hours care<br />

Leibowitz et al. 109 carried out a systematic review of the international literature to<br />

determine what evidence exists about the effect of different models of out-of-hours<br />

primary medical care services of general practitioner on outcome. Six main models of<br />

after-hours primary care services (not mutually exclusive) were identified: practicebased<br />

services, deputizing services, emergency departments, co-operatives, primary care<br />

centres, and te<strong>le</strong>phone triage and advice services.<br />

Deputizing service is a commercial organisation which arranges for or<br />

facilitates the provision of medical services to patients of general practitioners<br />

(practice principals) by other medical practitioners (deputizing doctors)<br />

during the absence of, and at the request of, the practice principals.<br />

General practice cooperatives: GPs from different practices forming a nonprofit<br />

making organization to provide care for their own patients after hours<br />

GP surgery consultation is a face-to-face consultation between GP and a<br />

patient on practice list in the practice building resulting in patient note entry.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!