Télécharger le rapport (152 p.) - KCE
Télécharger le rapport (152 p.) - KCE
Télécharger le rapport (152 p.) - KCE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
24 Urgences <strong>KCE</strong> reports vol. 19B<br />
General practitioners working in the emergency departments<br />
Gibney et al. investigated if care provided by general practitioners (GPs) to nonemergency<br />
patients, in a suburban ED using an informal triage system, differs significantly<br />
from care provided by usual ED staff 105 . One thousand eight hundred and seventy-eight<br />
patients participated. By comparison with usual ED staff, GPs prescribed significantly<br />
more often (percentage relative difference [% RD] = 12 [95% confidence interval = 1-<br />
23]) and referred more patients to hospital (% RD = 21 [95% CI = 9-33]). This is the<br />
first study to report that sessional GPs working in an ED utilize similar or more<br />
resources than usual ED staff. It emphasizes the need for the continued audit of<br />
initiatives that have been introduced into new settings.<br />
Walk-in centres<br />
Different forms of walk-in centres do exist in different countries. In the UK walk-in<br />
centres are walk in access organisations (no appointment needed) <strong>le</strong>d by nurses<br />
supported by software assessment, aiming at reducing the workload in GP and accident<br />
and emergency departments 106, 107 . The review of the literature, showed important<br />
distinctions in the concept of a walk-in centre in different countries. In some countries<br />
walk-in centres are <strong>le</strong>ad by doctors rather than nurses, in some countries walk-in<br />
centres stand in competition to the family doctor, some walk-in centres (Northern<br />
America and Australia) exclusively serve as an out-of-hours service. Users of walk-in<br />
centres in other countries tend to be a relatively affluent population of working age, and<br />
a different population from those using conventional general practice services. Walk-in<br />
centres are used particularly when other health services are closed. The prob<strong>le</strong>ms<br />
presented are mainly minor illnesses and minor injuries. Peop<strong>le</strong> choose this form of care<br />
mainly for reasons of convenience, and satisfaction with the service is generally high.<br />
The very limited evidence availab<strong>le</strong> suggests that walk-in centres provide care of<br />
reasonab<strong>le</strong> quality, but there is insufficient evidence to draw firm conclusions about the<br />
impact of walk-in centres on other healthcare services or the costs of such care. A<br />
potential danger of walk-in centres is that patients with serious illness present<br />
themselves to a walk-in centre instead of going to an emergency department.<br />
Chalder et al. 108 investigated the impact of NHS walk-in centres on the workload of<br />
local accident and emergency departments, general practices, and out of hours services<br />
using time series analysis. A reduction in consultations at emergency departments (-175<br />
(95% confidence interval -387 to 36) consultations per department per month) and<br />
general practices (-19.8 (-53.3 to 13.8) consultations per 1000 patients per month) close<br />
to walk-in centres became apparent, but these reductions were not statistically<br />
significant. Walk-in centres did not have any impact on consultations on out-of-hours<br />
services. The authors concluded that it will be necessary to assess the impact of walk-in<br />
centres in a larger number of sites and over a prolonged period, to determine whether<br />
they reduce the demand on other local NHS providers.<br />
Out-of hours care<br />
Leibowitz et al. 109 carried out a systematic review of the international literature to<br />
determine what evidence exists about the effect of different models of out-of-hours<br />
primary medical care services of general practitioner on outcome. Six main models of<br />
after-hours primary care services (not mutually exclusive) were identified: practicebased<br />
services, deputizing services, emergency departments, co-operatives, primary care<br />
centres, and te<strong>le</strong>phone triage and advice services.<br />
Deputizing service is a commercial organisation which arranges for or<br />
facilitates the provision of medical services to patients of general practitioners<br />
(practice principals) by other medical practitioners (deputizing doctors)<br />
during the absence of, and at the request of, the practice principals.<br />
General practice cooperatives: GPs from different practices forming a nonprofit<br />
making organization to provide care for their own patients after hours<br />
GP surgery consultation is a face-to-face consultation between GP and a<br />
patient on practice list in the practice building resulting in patient note entry.