28.07.2013 Views

Ecologia Mediterranea

Ecologia Mediterranea

Ecologia Mediterranea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

N. BOUCHENEB, S.S. BENHOUHOU<br />

70<br />

E1 Rhus tripartita-Olea europaea subsp. laperrinei community<br />

E2 Cassia aschrek-Panicum turgidum community<br />

E3 Tamarix gallica-Desmostachya bipinnata typical community<br />

E4 Tamarix aphylla-Farsetia ramosissima community<br />

E5 Acacia raddiana-Salvadora persica community<br />

E6 Leptadenia pyrotechnica-Chrozophora brocchiana community<br />

Figure 4 – Relevés spread of the whole data set along the first two axis.<br />

ies on desert vegetation (Abd El-Ghani &<br />

Amer 2003; Ali et al. 2000; Anthelme 2007;<br />

Benhouhou et al. 2003b; Dargie & El-Demerdash<br />

1991; Shaltout & Mady 1996; Springuel<br />

and Sheded 1991). The numerical analysis<br />

chosen is a correspondence analysis using<br />

ANAPHYTO (Brian 1991). The second stage<br />

of data analysis was the phytosociological<br />

study of the identified plant units via the association<br />

tables. These are considered as the<br />

basis for any syntaxonomical analysis. The<br />

only framework valid for the Algerian desert<br />

vegetation is the one proposed by Quézel<br />

(1965) and which has thus been considered in<br />

the present analysis. Among the four existing<br />

classes covering all the habitats encountered<br />

in this vast territory two classes were found:<br />

the Pergulario-Pulicarietea Quézel 1965 and<br />

the Asterisceto-Forsskaoletea Quézel 1965.<br />

We considered perennials to be the most<br />

important component in describing the vegetation<br />

units and treated annuals as companions<br />

usually characterised by erratic occurrence.<br />

The latter are of less importance as they<br />

reflect short-lived habitat conditions (Fossati<br />

et al. 1998).<br />

Results<br />

Axis 2<br />

Axis 1<br />

The correspondence analysis applied to the<br />

data matrix (190 relevés and 108 species)<br />

enabled the identification of six floristic<br />

groups (Figure 4). The high eigenvalues for<br />

the first two axes (axis 1: 0.58 and axis 2:<br />

0.45) suggest that two main gradients are at<br />

work. Analysis of the relevés spread along the<br />

first axis clearly indicates that an altitudinal<br />

gradient is responsible for the floristic distribution.<br />

Relevés close to the negative part of<br />

the first axis were taken at an altitude that<br />

varies between 1400 and 1600 m while those<br />

at the other end of the first axis were recorded<br />

between 800 to 900 m. Relevés plotted in the<br />

middle of the axis were taken at the intermediate<br />

altitude of 1200 m. The second axis<br />

shows a textural trend where relevés plotted<br />

towards the negative part of the axis were on<br />

coarse sand mixed with stones and those plotted<br />

at the other end had finer sand in their<br />

edaphic profile.<br />

From the 190 quadrats presented in the ordination,<br />

91 relevé “types” were chosen according<br />

to their floristic content to illustrate and<br />

discuss the six identified communities.<br />

ecologia mediterranea – Vol. 38 (2) – 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!