UNIVERSITÉ PAUL CÉZANNE, AIX MARSEILLE III - IMEP
UNIVERSITÉ PAUL CÉZANNE, AIX MARSEILLE III - IMEP
UNIVERSITÉ PAUL CÉZANNE, AIX MARSEILLE III - IMEP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Résultats et discussion. Chapitre 5: Disponibilité des substrats oléicoles<br />
heat gain in the greenhouse was 10% higher than the outside. In accordance with the<br />
increased temperature and heat gain, the drying of the OC-OMW mixture was much faster in<br />
the greenhouse than outside (Fig. 4).<br />
Moisture content (%)<br />
Figure 4. Typical drying curve of the OC-OMW mixture in the greenhouse ( ) and open sun<br />
( ) in Rabat-Morocco during February 2008; (a) First drying; (b) second drying.<br />
For the first drying, height hours of the day time were sufficient to reach the target<br />
moisture (40% w/w) in the greenhouse compared to 12 hours outside, which means that the<br />
drying process was some 1.5 times quicker in the greenhouse. For the second drying, the<br />
products obtained after 35 hours of drying including a night during which a very low loss of<br />
moisture occurred (less than 5% w/w in 10 hours) were also 3 times dryer in the greenhouse<br />
than outside (10% moisture against 30% w/w). The main limiting factor in the drying process<br />
corresponds to the very low drying efficiency achieved during the night period. This<br />
efficiency could be improved by implementing forced convection through the use of a fan<br />
powered with batteries recharged in the day by means of solar cell modules installed on the<br />
top of the greenhouse (Chow, 2009). Further, it is possible to imagine a complete automation<br />
of the absorption drying-process. OC may be loaded in the greenhouse with Archimedes<br />
screws and humidified with OMW through a dispositive of showers which could allow<br />
controlling precisely the humidity of the mixture.<br />
a<br />
Time (h)<br />
b<br />
137