05.07.2013 Views

UNIVERSITÉ PAUL CÉZANNE, AIX MARSEILLE III - IMEP

UNIVERSITÉ PAUL CÉZANNE, AIX MARSEILLE III - IMEP

UNIVERSITÉ PAUL CÉZANNE, AIX MARSEILLE III - IMEP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.3. Screening design<br />

Résultats et discussion. Chapitre 3: Evaluation des facteurs de croissance<br />

Sixteen experiments have been carried out according to the preparation method<br />

described above and the conditions fixed by the experimental design. Although the main<br />

purpose was to achieve the maximization of mycelial biomass production and the<br />

maximization of total phenol removal. The obtained values related to the mycelia biomass<br />

(mg of mycelium/g of substrate) and total phenol removal (%) are as shown in Table7.<br />

Table 7. Experimental conditions of the screening design with 6 factors (A-F) and the<br />

corresponding experimental responses.<br />

Run<br />

no<br />

A B C D E F Biomass<br />

Yield (mg.g -1 )<br />

Total phenol<br />

removal (%)<br />

1 5 20 25 20 T2 SO 48.72 82.35<br />

2 6 30 10 10 T1 SO 20.30 41.28<br />

3 5 20 25 20 T1 MS1 34.50 61.65<br />

4 6 30 10 10 T2 MS1 16.24 42.00<br />

5 5 20 10 10 T2 MS3 12.18 24.12<br />

6 6 30 25 20 T1 MS3 33.50 51.91<br />

7 5 20 10 10 T1 MS2 29.44 36.23<br />

8 6 30 25 20 T2 MS2 38.56 63.75<br />

9 5 30 25 10 T2 MS4 12.18 15.48<br />

10 6 20 10 20 T1 MS4 22.32 29.49<br />

11 5 30 25 10 T1 MS3 14.20 31.51<br />

12 6 20 10 20 T2 MS3 28.42 47.20<br />

13 5 30 10 20 T2 MS1 34.50 45.45<br />

14 6 20 25 10 T1 MS1 18.26 40.71<br />

15 5 30 10 20 T1 SO 44.66 82.68<br />

16 6 20 25 10 T2 SO 30.44 47.98<br />

3.4. Variable effects on mycelial biomass response<br />

Coefficient values (the weight associated to each factor level) and statistical analyses,<br />

using t-test are reported in Table 8a. These results are illustrated by the two histograms shown<br />

in Fig.1. Fig. 1a represents the weight of each factor taking its highest level as reference. Fig.<br />

1b represents the differential effects of each factor when considering two different levels<br />

taken two by two (Mathieu and Phan-Than-Luu 1997; Lewis et al., 1999).<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!