29.06.2013 Views

THÈSE - Université de Franche-Comté

THÈSE - Université de Franche-Comté

THÈSE - Université de Franche-Comté

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SYNTHESIS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CONTROL OF A. TERRESTRIS POPULATIONS<br />

The present study <strong>de</strong>monstrated a bottom-up regulation of the dynamics of vole populations<br />

on a parcel scale. It suggests a strong relationship between the growth and the abundance of A.<br />

terrestris populations and their optimal habitat, whose characteristics can be modified by<br />

certain farming practices and grassland management.<br />

Our study showed that more intensive grassland management was favourable to A. terrestris<br />

populations. This may be explained by the fact that grassland management may indirectly<br />

favour T. europaea populations and provi<strong>de</strong> better shelter against predators (Jacob & Brown<br />

2000) and thermal variations (Jacob & Halle 2001). In contrast, practices like harrowing,<br />

ploughing and grazing are unfavourable as they disturb soil burrows and vegetation cover.<br />

However, as <strong>de</strong>scribed by Jacob & Halle (2001), we found that each of these favourable and<br />

unfavourable practices must be sufficiently intensive and repeated (frequent mowing and soil<br />

work, intensive grazing) to have a long-term effect on vole populations.<br />

However, we can not exclu<strong>de</strong> that other variables could also affect the A. terrestris population<br />

increase on a parcel scale. These variables could inclu<strong>de</strong> soil and vegetation characteristics,<br />

the landscape context and the farming management in adjacent areas. In<strong>de</strong>ed, theoretical<br />

approaches have shown that dispersal alone conditional on the properties of local population<br />

dynamics can explain <strong>de</strong>nsity variations in lattice mo<strong>de</strong>ls (Ranta 1998). The role of predation<br />

may also account for inter-annual variations of small mammal population <strong>de</strong>nsity (Hanski et<br />

al. 2001). Thus, on a larger scale, the role of arrangement of habitats and farming practices in<br />

population dynamic control subsidiary or complementary to predation and parasitism (Newey<br />

et al. 2005) cannot be discar<strong>de</strong>d.<br />

The interpretation of our results and their subsequent application in a control strategy will<br />

have to consi<strong>de</strong>r (i) the phase of the population cycle (Edge et al. 1995), (ii) the spatial scale at<br />

which control is to be carried out, (iii) the intensity and the duration of the disturbing farming<br />

practices (Jacob 2003), (iv) the farming practice history in the area un<strong>de</strong>r study.<br />

Chemical ro<strong>de</strong>ntici<strong>de</strong>s currently used to prevent extensive crop damage are also hazards to<br />

non-target animals and auxiliary fauna (foxes, buzzard, etc…) (Brakes & Smith 2005). They<br />

Thèse C. Morilhat 2005 109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!