_09 HDR Giboreau - Institut Paul Bocuse

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Medin D.L. & Barsalou L.W. (1987) Categorisation processes and categorical perception. In: Harnad S. (Ed.) Categorical perception. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. Mehinagic E., Royer G., Bertrand D., Symoneaux R., Laurens F. & Jourjon F. (2003) Relationship between sensory analysis, penetrometry and visible–NIR spectroscopy of apples belonging to different cultivars. Food Quality and Preference, 14( 5-6), 473-484. Meilgaard M., Civille G. V. & Carr B. T. (2007) Sensory Evaluation Techniques. 4 th ed. Boca Raton : CRC Press. Meiselman H.L. (1993) Critical evaluation of sensory techniques. Food Quality and Preference, 4(1-2), 33- 40. Meiselman H.L., Johnson J.L., Reeve W. &Crouch J.E. (2000) Demonstrations of the influence of the eating environment on food acceptance. Appetite, 35, 231-237. Merleau-Ponty M. (1945) Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris : Gallimard. Moore D.J. & Homer P.M. (2000) Dimensions of temperament: affect intensity and consumer lifestyles. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9(4), 231-242. Morrot G., Brochet F. & Dubourdieu D. (2001) The color of odors. Brain and Language, 79(2), 309-320. Moskowitz H.R. (1998) The relation between sensory, liking and image attributes: the case of soap. Journal of Sensory Studies, 13, 13-27. Moskowitz H.R. (2003) The intertwining of psychophysics and sensory analysis: historical perspectives and future opportunities – a personal view. Food Quality and Preference, 14, 87-98. Moskowitz H.R., Munoz A. M. & Gacula M.C. (2005) Viewpoints and Controversies in Sensory Science and Consumer Product Testing Iowa State University Press. Muñoz A.M. & Civille G.V. (1992) The spectrum descriptive analysis method in R.C. Hootman (Ed.) Manual on Descriptive Analysis Testing ASTM Manual Series MNL 13. West Conshohocken : American Society of Testing and Materials. Murray J. M., Delahunty, C. M. & Baxter, I. A. (2001). Descriptive sensory analysis: past, present and future. Food Research International, 34, 461-471. Mzali M. (2002) Perception de l'ambiance sonore et évaluation du confort acoustique dans les trains. Thèse de doctorat en acoustique. Université Paris VI. Naes T. & Risvik E. (Eds.) (1996) Multivariate analysis of data in sensory science In Data Handling in Science and Technology series, 16, Amsterdam : Elsevier. Neisser U. (1967) Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, cité par Best J.B. (1992) Cognitive Psychology, 3 rd ed., St Paul MN: West Publishing Company. Neisser U. (1987) Concepts and conceptual development: ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Nelson K. (1985) Making sense. Development of meaning in earlychildhood. Neaw Yord: Academic Press. Nicklaus S., Boggio V. & Issanchou S. (2005) Les perceptions gustatives chez l’enfant. Archives de Pédiatrie, 12(5), 579-584. Norman D.A. (2002(1990)) The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books (Perseus). O’Mahony M. (1985) Sensory evaluation of food: statistical methods and procedures. New York : Marcel Dekker. O’Mahony M. & Hautus M.J. (2008) The signal detection theory ROC curve: some applications in food sensory sciences. Journal of Sensory Studies. 23, 186-204. O’Mahony M., Masuoka S. & Ishii R. (1994) A theoretical note on difference tests: models, paradoxes and cognitives strategies. Journal of Sensory Studies, 9, 247-272. O’Mahony M., Rothman L., Ellison T., Shaw D. & Buteau L. (1990) Taste descriptive analysis: concept formation, alignment and appropriateness. Journal of Sensory Studies, 5, 71 - 103. - 116 -
Pangborn R.M. (1989) The evolution of sensory science and its interaction with IFT. Food Technology, 43(9), 248–256, 307. Pastoureau M. (2003) Les couleurs de notre temps. Paris : Bonneton. Proust J. (1997) Perception et intermodalité – Approches actuelles de la question de Molyneux. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France. Raz C., Piper D., Nicod H., Haller R., Dusart N. & Giboreau A.(2008) From Sensory Marketing to Sensory Design. Food Quality and Preference, 19, 719–726. Reed S. (2007) Cognition, Théories et applications. Bruxelles : De Boeck Université. Richardson R.K., Morris E.R., Ross-Murphy S.B., Taylor L.J. & Dea I.C.M. (1989) Characterization of the perceived texture of thickened systems by dynamic viscosity measurements. Food Hydrocolloids, 3(3), 175- 191. Rivière P., Montrozier R., Rogeaux M., Pagès J. & Saporta G. (2006) Adaptive preference target: Contribution of Kano’s model of satisfaction for an optimized preference analysis using a sequential consumer test. Food Quality and Preference, 17, 572-581. Rosch E. (1973) Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328-350. Rosch E. (1978) Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B.B. Lloyd (Eds.) Cognition and Categorization. Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Rosch E. & Mervis C.B. (1975) Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605. Rosenthal V. & Visetti Y.M. (1999) Sens et temps de la gestalt. Intellectica, 1(28), 147- 227. Rouby C., Schaal B., Holley A., Dubois D. & Gervais R. (Éds.) (2002) Olfaction, taste, and cognition. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. Sauvageot F. (1998) L'évaluation sensorielle : une technique qui mobilise l'activité cognitive des sujets tout autant que leur activité sensorielle. Industries Alimentaires Agricoles (Mars) 33-40. Sauvageot F. & Brémaud D. (2008) Comment comparer les performances de jurys effectuant des profils sensoriels sur les mêmes produits mais dans des pays différents : une proposition de l'AFNOR. 6 ème Journée du sensolier Diversités culturelles et sensorialités, Paris le 9 Octobre. Sauvageot F. & Dacremont C. (2001) L’évaluation sensorielle à la portée de tous – Les premiers pas en évaluation sensorielle. 4 ème Ed., Dijon : Ensbana – Université de Bourgogne. Sauvageot F., Herbreteau V., Shepherd M. & Dacremont C. (2009) A comparison between nine laboratories performing triangle tests. Soumis à Food Quality & Preference. Sauvageot F., Urdapilleta I. & Peyron D. (2006) Within and between variations of texts elicited from nine wine experts. Food Quality and Preference, 17(6) 429-444. Schifferstein H.N.J. (2006) The perceived importance of sensory modalities in product usage: a study of self-reports. Acta Psychologica, 121(1), 41-64. Schifferstein H.N.J. & Cleiren M.P.H.D. (2005) Capturine product experiences: a split-modality approach. Acta Psychologica, 118, 293-318. Schiffman R.S (2007) Sensation and perception, An integrated approach. (5 th Ed.) New York : J. Wiley & sons. Schiffman S. S., Reynolds, M. L. & Young, F. W. (1981) Introduction to multidimensional scaling: theory, methods, applications. New York : Academic Press. Schlich P. & Mac Ewan J. (1992) Cartographie des preferences. Un outil statistique pour l'industrie alimentaire. Science des aliments, 12, 339-355. Schlich P. (1993) Risk tables for discrimination tests Food Quality & Preference, 4, 141-151. - 117 -
Page 1:
De l'analyse sensorielle au jugemen
Page 5:
Merci, aux étudiants et aux collè
Page 9:
1. Introduction Tu découvriras que
Page 12 and 13:
- Introduction - sens des sens (193
Page 14 and 15:
Sensibilité extéroceptive Sensibi
Page 16 and 17:
- 8 -
Page 18 and 19:
- 10 -
Page 20 and 21:
- Perspective centrée « Produits
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
≻ En résumé - Perspective centr
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
- 46 -
Page 56 and 57:
- 48 -
Page 58 and 59:
- Perspective centrée « Sujets »
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75: - Perspective centrée « Sujets »
Page 84 and 85: ≻ En résumé - Perspective centr
Page 98 and 99: - 90 -
Page 100 and 101: - 92 -
Page 102 and 103: - Projets de recherche - Mes recher
Page 104 and 105: Premier plan de réflexion Objets T
Page 106 and 107: - Projets de recherche - basées su
Page 108 and 109: - Projets de recherche - que certai
Page 110 and 111: - Projets de recherche - Pour cela,
Page 112 and 113: - Projets de recherche - connaissan
Page 114 and 115: - Projets de recherche - processus
Page 116 and 117: La multisensorialité des perceptio
Page 118 and 119: - 110 -
Page 120 and 121: Candel D. (2000) Français scientif
Page 122 and 123: Helgesen H., Solheim R. & Naes T. (
Page 126 and 127: Schlich P. (1997) CAP : une méthod
Page 128 and 129: - 120 -
Page 130 and 131: - 122 -
Page 132 and 133: Chapitres d'ouvrage, ouvrage 2010 G
Page 134 and 135: Conférences invitées 2009 Comment
Page 136 and 137: 2001 Picard D., Dacremont C., Valen
Page 138: Résumé L’étude de la perceptio
show all

_09 HDR Giboreau - Institut Paul Bocuse

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?