11.06.2013 Views

Télécharger le livret - Outhere

Télécharger le livret - Outhere

Télécharger le livret - Outhere

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

one argument goes against this theory: and that<br />

is the state of manuscript, a working score with<br />

many corrections. That is why i rather believe that<br />

it was the Sonata in E flat major (D 568)<br />

which had been envisaged for publication as number<br />

iii. Who else but a publisher who was thinking<br />

that a sonata with a key signature of three flats<br />

would sell more easily than one with five flats,<br />

could have persuaded Schubert to transpose the<br />

Sonata D 567 originally written in D flat major?<br />

The corrections introduced to the version in E flat<br />

major when compared to the original version also<br />

suggest a revision made by the composer himself<br />

a few years later. Finally this Sonata was published<br />

as opus 122 relatively soon after Schubert’s death,<br />

probably without his brother enjoying the rights<br />

that he should have inherited.<br />

∆<br />

The three last sonatas<br />

We cannot help noticing certain analogies between<br />

the development of the last three symphonies<br />

of Mozart (composed in 1788) and that of the<br />

last three sonatas for piano of Schubert (dating<br />

from September 1828). Written without any apparent<br />

external reason, and within an extremely short<br />

space of time, these two triptyches both represent<br />

in their particular genres, the apotheosis of their<br />

art. They each include one work in a minor key and<br />

two in a major key, brought together by an implicit<br />

cyclical relationship. Naturally there are differences<br />

between them: the end of the Jupiter radiates with<br />

Apollonian joy, whi<strong>le</strong> the last Sonata is fil<strong>le</strong>d with<br />

54<br />

serenity and nostalgia, as if Schubert felt a foreboding<br />

that he only had a few weeks to life.<br />

in his critical study of the last three Sonatas,<br />

Schumann, despite his usual intuitive clairvoyance,<br />

committed a grave error of judgment, which<br />

has since been repeated without justification. He<br />

felt a certain diminution in Schubert’s creative faculties<br />

due to illness. But there can be no question<br />

here of a weakening in his power of composition,<br />

rather a deliberate departure into unexplored territory,<br />

scaring to peaks where icy winds blow. This<br />

new expressive domain serves to explain, here and<br />

there, a certain savage ruggedness and the evocation<br />

of an icy landscape, a hundred mi<strong>le</strong>s away in<br />

fact from the flowery orchards of his youth.<br />

∆<br />

Sonata no. 18 in C minor, D 958<br />

“it is by my instinct for music and my suffering<br />

that my works exist: those works born of my suffering<br />

alone seem to bring <strong>le</strong>ss joy to the world”<br />

(extract from Schubert’s Dairy of 1824 which has<br />

since disappeared).<br />

“Engraved by suffering and instinct”. Few of<br />

the works mentioned like this in Schubert’s Diary<br />

justify the description as much as the Sonata in<br />

C minor. And as Schubert so rightly said, tragic<br />

works of this nature enjoy at first encounter <strong>le</strong>ss<br />

success than more serene works. Still today in the<br />

eyes of most peop<strong>le</strong> Schubert is first and foremost<br />

the creator of p<strong>le</strong>asant melodies. However the<br />

“tragic” Schubert, to whom we are indebted for<br />

the most profound and beautiful musical expression,<br />

is all the same now gradually beginning to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!