08.06.2013 Views

1957 - United Nations Statistics Division

1957 - United Nations Statistics Division

1957 - United Nations Statistics Division

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A stillbirth is generally understood to be the birth of a<br />

viable foetus that is dead at birth or, in other words, a<br />

foetal death occurring late enough in pregnancy for there<br />

to have been a fair chance of survival, that is, after at<br />

least 28 completed weeks of gestation.<br />

Criteria of viability are usually based on the duration<br />

of pregnancy, measured in days, weeks, or months. The<br />

minimum period of gestation varies widely, ranging, according<br />

to available information, from 3 to 7 months.<br />

The minimum interval most frequently specified is 28<br />

weeks. 49 Some countries use an additional requirement<br />

that the foetus be a minimum length, ranging from 30 to<br />

35 centimetres. In a number of cases, the only specification<br />

is simply that the foetus must be viable or that it<br />

must be recognizable as a human being. On the other<br />

hand, some countries do not consider viability but classify<br />

as stillbirths all foetuses which arc reported to have been<br />

born dead.<br />

Although full information on the definition of "stillbirths"<br />

could not be obtained for all the areas and years<br />

for which data are shown in this volume, some information<br />

on current practices in distinguishing stillbirths<br />

from abortions is available from the Handbook of Vital<br />

<strong>Statistics</strong> Methods and it is set forth in the tables.<br />

Foetal deaths more than any other are subject to severe<br />

limitations as regards completeness of registration. It<br />

would appear that, even with a highly efficient registration<br />

system, the proportion of foetal deaths escaping<br />

registration is considerably larger than the corresponding<br />

birth and death omissions, but it is difficult-if not impossible-to<br />

estimate the extent. Consequently, no precise<br />

information on completeness of coverage (similar to that<br />

which was devised for other tables) could be developed<br />

for foetal deaths and, hence, no quality code appears in<br />

Table 20. Perhaps the most that can be said, in general,<br />

is that the coverage of foetal deaths in countries where<br />

most confinements are medically attended is more complete<br />

than in others.<br />

It may be noted that certain countries classify as "stillbirths"<br />

live-born infants dying shortly after birth, i.e.,<br />

within 24 hours or before registration as a live birth. For<br />

clarity, these might be termed "pseudo-stillbirths". The<br />

countries that are known to follow these practices are<br />

noted when they appear in the tables.<br />

Table 20<br />

Table 20 is the trend table which shows the number of<br />

late foetal deaths (stillbirths), together with late foetaldeath<br />

ratios, for the period 1948-1956. The definitions of<br />

"stillbirth" on which the data are based may be found in<br />

the Handbook of Vital <strong>Statistics</strong> Methods, Annex 3.<br />

Coverage: The coverage of this table, 129 geographic<br />

areas, is limited only by the policy of restricting ratios to<br />

frequencies of 15 or more. Thus, a few potential areas<br />

are not included because of the smallness of the numbers<br />

involved.<br />

The restrictions imposed on coverage by the need to<br />

achieve strict correspondence between the numerator and<br />

denominator of the ratio is not so effective as it is in rate<br />

tables, because the ratios are computed in relation to the<br />

,. Deriving from the fact that prior to 1950, the international definition<br />

of a "stillbirth" specified 28 weeks as the lower limit of<br />

viability.<br />

37<br />

number of live births rather than to population estimates.<br />

It is generally true that if stillbirth statistics are<br />

available, live-birth figures will also be at hand.<br />

Ratio computation: The ratios shown in the table are the<br />

numbers of stillbirths reported per 1,000 live births in<br />

the same period, rather than per 1,000 of the combined<br />

total of live births and stillbirths. This method of computation<br />

is adopted in view of the variability in the completeness<br />

of reporting of stillbirths and the comparative<br />

stability of the reporting of live births.<br />

All ratios have been computed in the Statistical Office<br />

of the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Nations</strong> on live births shown in Table 6,<br />

except in the case of Ceylon where official stillbirth ratios<br />

were used for lack of recorded live births in the "Proclaimed<br />

Areas".<br />

Limitations: All the limitations described on p. 36 are<br />

applicable to data in this table. Those of special significance<br />

are variations in completeness and problems of<br />

definition.<br />

It is difficult to identify incompleteness in foetal-death<br />

registration. Foetal deaths are known to be incompletely<br />

registered in most countries of the world, but when<br />

foetal deaths and live births are both under-registered,<br />

the resulting ratios may be of reasonable magnitude. As<br />

a matter of fact, for the countries where live-birth registration<br />

is poorest, the ratios may be the largest, effectively<br />

masking the incompleteness of the base data. For this<br />

reason, possible variations in birth-registration completeness<br />

must always be borne in mind in evaluating foetaldeath<br />

ratios.<br />

In addition to the indirect effect of live-birth underregistration,<br />

foetal-death ratios may be seriously affected<br />

by date-of-registration tabulation of live births. When the<br />

annual number of live births registered and reported fluctuates<br />

over a wide range due to changes in legislation or to<br />

special needs for proof of birth on the part of large segments<br />

of the population, then the foetal-death ratios will<br />

fluctuate also, but inversely. Because of these effects, data<br />

for countries known to tabulate live births by date of registration<br />

should be used with caution unless it is also<br />

known that statistics by date of registration approximate<br />

those by date of occurrence.<br />

Finally, it may be noted that the counting as "stillbirths"<br />

of live-born infants who die before registration<br />

has the effect of inflating the foetal-death ratios unduly<br />

by decreasing the birth denominator and increasing the<br />

foetal-death numerator. This factor should not be overlooked<br />

in using data from this table. The potential size<br />

of the problem has been set forth in the Handbook of<br />

Vital <strong>Statistics</strong> Methods, p. 58.<br />

Table 21<br />

Foetal deaths and ratios by period of gestation are set<br />

forth in Table 21 for each year 1950-1956. This is the first<br />

time that statistics of this type have been presented in the<br />

Demographic Yearbook. Examination of the table will<br />

show that they are by no means consistent and comparable<br />

statistics. Many are late foetal deaths only, i.e., those<br />

of 28 weeks or more gestation; others are deaths occurring<br />

after 6 months' gestation. However, they do provide<br />

some idea of the number of countries which tabulate<br />

foetal deaths by gestational age, which is a further exten-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!