1957 - United Nations Statistics Division
1957 - United Nations Statistics Division
1957 - United Nations Statistics Division
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A stillbirth is generally understood to be the birth of a<br />
viable foetus that is dead at birth or, in other words, a<br />
foetal death occurring late enough in pregnancy for there<br />
to have been a fair chance of survival, that is, after at<br />
least 28 completed weeks of gestation.<br />
Criteria of viability are usually based on the duration<br />
of pregnancy, measured in days, weeks, or months. The<br />
minimum period of gestation varies widely, ranging, according<br />
to available information, from 3 to 7 months.<br />
The minimum interval most frequently specified is 28<br />
weeks. 49 Some countries use an additional requirement<br />
that the foetus be a minimum length, ranging from 30 to<br />
35 centimetres. In a number of cases, the only specification<br />
is simply that the foetus must be viable or that it<br />
must be recognizable as a human being. On the other<br />
hand, some countries do not consider viability but classify<br />
as stillbirths all foetuses which arc reported to have been<br />
born dead.<br />
Although full information on the definition of "stillbirths"<br />
could not be obtained for all the areas and years<br />
for which data are shown in this volume, some information<br />
on current practices in distinguishing stillbirths<br />
from abortions is available from the Handbook of Vital<br />
<strong>Statistics</strong> Methods and it is set forth in the tables.<br />
Foetal deaths more than any other are subject to severe<br />
limitations as regards completeness of registration. It<br />
would appear that, even with a highly efficient registration<br />
system, the proportion of foetal deaths escaping<br />
registration is considerably larger than the corresponding<br />
birth and death omissions, but it is difficult-if not impossible-to<br />
estimate the extent. Consequently, no precise<br />
information on completeness of coverage (similar to that<br />
which was devised for other tables) could be developed<br />
for foetal deaths and, hence, no quality code appears in<br />
Table 20. Perhaps the most that can be said, in general,<br />
is that the coverage of foetal deaths in countries where<br />
most confinements are medically attended is more complete<br />
than in others.<br />
It may be noted that certain countries classify as "stillbirths"<br />
live-born infants dying shortly after birth, i.e.,<br />
within 24 hours or before registration as a live birth. For<br />
clarity, these might be termed "pseudo-stillbirths". The<br />
countries that are known to follow these practices are<br />
noted when they appear in the tables.<br />
Table 20<br />
Table 20 is the trend table which shows the number of<br />
late foetal deaths (stillbirths), together with late foetaldeath<br />
ratios, for the period 1948-1956. The definitions of<br />
"stillbirth" on which the data are based may be found in<br />
the Handbook of Vital <strong>Statistics</strong> Methods, Annex 3.<br />
Coverage: The coverage of this table, 129 geographic<br />
areas, is limited only by the policy of restricting ratios to<br />
frequencies of 15 or more. Thus, a few potential areas<br />
are not included because of the smallness of the numbers<br />
involved.<br />
The restrictions imposed on coverage by the need to<br />
achieve strict correspondence between the numerator and<br />
denominator of the ratio is not so effective as it is in rate<br />
tables, because the ratios are computed in relation to the<br />
,. Deriving from the fact that prior to 1950, the international definition<br />
of a "stillbirth" specified 28 weeks as the lower limit of<br />
viability.<br />
37<br />
number of live births rather than to population estimates.<br />
It is generally true that if stillbirth statistics are<br />
available, live-birth figures will also be at hand.<br />
Ratio computation: The ratios shown in the table are the<br />
numbers of stillbirths reported per 1,000 live births in<br />
the same period, rather than per 1,000 of the combined<br />
total of live births and stillbirths. This method of computation<br />
is adopted in view of the variability in the completeness<br />
of reporting of stillbirths and the comparative<br />
stability of the reporting of live births.<br />
All ratios have been computed in the Statistical Office<br />
of the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Nations</strong> on live births shown in Table 6,<br />
except in the case of Ceylon where official stillbirth ratios<br />
were used for lack of recorded live births in the "Proclaimed<br />
Areas".<br />
Limitations: All the limitations described on p. 36 are<br />
applicable to data in this table. Those of special significance<br />
are variations in completeness and problems of<br />
definition.<br />
It is difficult to identify incompleteness in foetal-death<br />
registration. Foetal deaths are known to be incompletely<br />
registered in most countries of the world, but when<br />
foetal deaths and live births are both under-registered,<br />
the resulting ratios may be of reasonable magnitude. As<br />
a matter of fact, for the countries where live-birth registration<br />
is poorest, the ratios may be the largest, effectively<br />
masking the incompleteness of the base data. For this<br />
reason, possible variations in birth-registration completeness<br />
must always be borne in mind in evaluating foetaldeath<br />
ratios.<br />
In addition to the indirect effect of live-birth underregistration,<br />
foetal-death ratios may be seriously affected<br />
by date-of-registration tabulation of live births. When the<br />
annual number of live births registered and reported fluctuates<br />
over a wide range due to changes in legislation or to<br />
special needs for proof of birth on the part of large segments<br />
of the population, then the foetal-death ratios will<br />
fluctuate also, but inversely. Because of these effects, data<br />
for countries known to tabulate live births by date of registration<br />
should be used with caution unless it is also<br />
known that statistics by date of registration approximate<br />
those by date of occurrence.<br />
Finally, it may be noted that the counting as "stillbirths"<br />
of live-born infants who die before registration<br />
has the effect of inflating the foetal-death ratios unduly<br />
by decreasing the birth denominator and increasing the<br />
foetal-death numerator. This factor should not be overlooked<br />
in using data from this table. The potential size<br />
of the problem has been set forth in the Handbook of<br />
Vital <strong>Statistics</strong> Methods, p. 58.<br />
Table 21<br />
Foetal deaths and ratios by period of gestation are set<br />
forth in Table 21 for each year 1950-1956. This is the first<br />
time that statistics of this type have been presented in the<br />
Demographic Yearbook. Examination of the table will<br />
show that they are by no means consistent and comparable<br />
statistics. Many are late foetal deaths only, i.e., those<br />
of 28 weeks or more gestation; others are deaths occurring<br />
after 6 months' gestation. However, they do provide<br />
some idea of the number of countries which tabulate<br />
foetal deaths by gestational age, which is a further exten-