1957 - United Nations Statistics Division
1957 - United Nations Statistics Division
1957 - United Nations Statistics Division
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table 4<br />
Table 4 shows the latest post-censal estimates of population<br />
classified by age and sex, together with the results<br />
of censuses of population which were taken in 1945-<strong>1957</strong><br />
but which were not available in time to be included in<br />
the 1955 or 1956 Demographic Yearbook. It will be recalled<br />
that Table 10 of the 1955 Yearbook showed all<br />
census returns available at that time from enumerations<br />
carried out between 1945 and 1954. The 1956 Yearbook<br />
supplemented that comprehensive coverage with new or<br />
revised censuses and latest estimates. Table 4 in this issue<br />
continues this practice with censuses taken through <strong>1957</strong>.<br />
The census data shown are for both national and subnational<br />
segments, depending on the coverage of the respective<br />
enumerations. The estimates are assumed to be<br />
constructed on the basis of the census returns, using<br />
statistics of births, deaths, immigrants, and emigrants to<br />
adjust the base population to a current date. In general,<br />
estimates relate to the mid-year but, in a few cases, the<br />
mean population, calculated from two end-year estimates,<br />
is given. These estimates are so identified in this<br />
table.<br />
The age classification shown for censuses and estimates<br />
is based, unless otherwise indicated, on age at last birthday.l4<br />
It includes 20 categories as follows: under 1 year;<br />
1-4,5-9, continuing in 5-year groups to 84; a residual category<br />
of 85 and over; and unknown. This classification<br />
represents a slight modification of that recommended by<br />
the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Nations</strong> Population Commission,15 which suggested<br />
single-year tabulations from I through 4 and 5-year<br />
groups to the end of life.<br />
Unless otherwise noted, the data relate to the modified<br />
present-in-area population of geographic areas within<br />
present territorial boundaries, as described on p. 15. If<br />
the "modification" has involved large numbers of persons,<br />
a special note is also appended for clarity even<br />
though the resulting estimate is the standard for the table.<br />
Coverage: Table 4 includes one or more age-sex distributions<br />
for 61 geographic units, comprising a total of 70<br />
separate arrays, of which 28 relate to a census count and<br />
40 to postal-censal estimates.<br />
Availability was not the sole criterion used in determining<br />
the scope of Table 4. A number of available agesex<br />
distributions of population were deliberately excluded<br />
on the basis of their construction. To be included in<br />
this table, an estimate must have been constructed by<br />
the natural increase method, supplemented of course by<br />
migration statistics if available. Distributions which result<br />
when the estimated total population is distributed by<br />
age and sex according to percentages in each age-sex<br />
group at the time of the census are aot acceptable. Such<br />
distributions are on file for Bolivia, Ceuta, Colombia,<br />
Dominican Republic, Egypt, Melilla, Mexico, Philippines,<br />
Spain, and Thailand.<br />
Limitations: Comparability of population data classified by<br />
age and sex, is limited in the first place by variations in<br />
the definition of total population which has been discussed<br />
in detail on p. 15, and by the completeness of<br />
the original enumeration, also discussed above. Both<br />
of these factors are more important in relation to certain<br />
14 For a discussion of this factor, see the 1956 Demographic Yearbook,<br />
p. 26.<br />
15 Report of the Population Commission (Fourth Session), document<br />
E/1313, p. 17.<br />
22<br />
age groups than to others. For example, underenumeration<br />
is known to be more prevalent among young children<br />
than at older ages; the composition of the "total" population<br />
is primarily a function of the inclusion or exclusion<br />
of certain groups who may be of selected ages, such as<br />
members of the armed forces and so forth. Consideration<br />
should be given to the implications of these basic limitations<br />
in using the data.<br />
In addition to the defects inherent in the basic census<br />
data, estimates of population suffer also from lack of<br />
comparability in quality. To evaluate this factor, reference<br />
should be made to the "type-of-estimate" code described<br />
on p. 16. The classification of 1956 estimates by<br />
this code may be found in Table 1, and it may be assumed<br />
that the code is generally applicable to other postcensal<br />
estimates unless the post-censa1 period is excessively<br />
long.<br />
Further to these general qualifications are the special<br />
problems of comparability which arise in relation to age<br />
statistics in particular. Age-sex distributions of population<br />
are known to suffer from certain deficiencies which<br />
have their origin in underenumeration of infants and in<br />
irregularities in age reporting. A discussion of these irregularities<br />
together with a description of the procedures<br />
for testing age accuracy and the results of its application<br />
to single-year-of-age data are given on p. 17. Although<br />
some of the irregularities in the age statistics tend to be<br />
obscured or eliminated when data are tabulated in 5-year<br />
age groups, precision still continues to be affected, though<br />
the degree of distortion is not always readily seen. The<br />
classification of age distribution by Whipple's Index<br />
given in the 1955 and 1956 Demographic Yearbooks will<br />
thus continue to serve as a guide to the evaluation of<br />
age-sex accuracy in Table 4.<br />
Another limitation on comparability is found in the<br />
basis for the age classification employed by the various<br />
countries. Whenever it was known that the classification<br />
was based on other than age at last birthday, the data are<br />
so noted in the tables and allowance should be made for<br />
this factor in using the data.<br />
Deviations from the standard age classification of the<br />
ta ble are shown by bracketing and footnotes. Although<br />
precise international comparability of specific age groups<br />
is often lacking, the data are nevertheless included because<br />
of their basic value for the area concerned. This is<br />
particularly true for African areas; since statistics for<br />
these territories have not been generally available until<br />
recent years, the results of sample censuses and others<br />
employing unconventional methodology are included because<br />
of the scarcity of information for this continent.<br />
In connexion with the age classification, it should be<br />
noted that zero frequency reported in the unknown-age<br />
category is not always an indication of perfect age reporting-,<br />
but may be an indication that ages have been assigned<br />
before tabulation began. The method of age allocation<br />
!s not always known and hence it is noted infrequently<br />
III the tables, but the possibility of its having occurred<br />
should not be overlooked.<br />
Table 5<br />
Table 5 presents the latest estimate or enumeration of<br />
population in the national capital of each country irrespective<br />
of size, together with that in cities having at<br />
least 100,000 inhabitants.