08.06.2013 Views

1957 - United Nations Statistics Division

1957 - United Nations Statistics Division

1957 - United Nations Statistics Division

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 4<br />

Table 4 shows the latest post-censal estimates of population<br />

classified by age and sex, together with the results<br />

of censuses of population which were taken in 1945-<strong>1957</strong><br />

but which were not available in time to be included in<br />

the 1955 or 1956 Demographic Yearbook. It will be recalled<br />

that Table 10 of the 1955 Yearbook showed all<br />

census returns available at that time from enumerations<br />

carried out between 1945 and 1954. The 1956 Yearbook<br />

supplemented that comprehensive coverage with new or<br />

revised censuses and latest estimates. Table 4 in this issue<br />

continues this practice with censuses taken through <strong>1957</strong>.<br />

The census data shown are for both national and subnational<br />

segments, depending on the coverage of the respective<br />

enumerations. The estimates are assumed to be<br />

constructed on the basis of the census returns, using<br />

statistics of births, deaths, immigrants, and emigrants to<br />

adjust the base population to a current date. In general,<br />

estimates relate to the mid-year but, in a few cases, the<br />

mean population, calculated from two end-year estimates,<br />

is given. These estimates are so identified in this<br />

table.<br />

The age classification shown for censuses and estimates<br />

is based, unless otherwise indicated, on age at last birthday.l4<br />

It includes 20 categories as follows: under 1 year;<br />

1-4,5-9, continuing in 5-year groups to 84; a residual category<br />

of 85 and over; and unknown. This classification<br />

represents a slight modification of that recommended by<br />

the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Nations</strong> Population Commission,15 which suggested<br />

single-year tabulations from I through 4 and 5-year<br />

groups to the end of life.<br />

Unless otherwise noted, the data relate to the modified<br />

present-in-area population of geographic areas within<br />

present territorial boundaries, as described on p. 15. If<br />

the "modification" has involved large numbers of persons,<br />

a special note is also appended for clarity even<br />

though the resulting estimate is the standard for the table.<br />

Coverage: Table 4 includes one or more age-sex distributions<br />

for 61 geographic units, comprising a total of 70<br />

separate arrays, of which 28 relate to a census count and<br />

40 to postal-censal estimates.<br />

Availability was not the sole criterion used in determining<br />

the scope of Table 4. A number of available agesex<br />

distributions of population were deliberately excluded<br />

on the basis of their construction. To be included in<br />

this table, an estimate must have been constructed by<br />

the natural increase method, supplemented of course by<br />

migration statistics if available. Distributions which result<br />

when the estimated total population is distributed by<br />

age and sex according to percentages in each age-sex<br />

group at the time of the census are aot acceptable. Such<br />

distributions are on file for Bolivia, Ceuta, Colombia,<br />

Dominican Republic, Egypt, Melilla, Mexico, Philippines,<br />

Spain, and Thailand.<br />

Limitations: Comparability of population data classified by<br />

age and sex, is limited in the first place by variations in<br />

the definition of total population which has been discussed<br />

in detail on p. 15, and by the completeness of<br />

the original enumeration, also discussed above. Both<br />

of these factors are more important in relation to certain<br />

14 For a discussion of this factor, see the 1956 Demographic Yearbook,<br />

p. 26.<br />

15 Report of the Population Commission (Fourth Session), document<br />

E/1313, p. 17.<br />

22<br />

age groups than to others. For example, underenumeration<br />

is known to be more prevalent among young children<br />

than at older ages; the composition of the "total" population<br />

is primarily a function of the inclusion or exclusion<br />

of certain groups who may be of selected ages, such as<br />

members of the armed forces and so forth. Consideration<br />

should be given to the implications of these basic limitations<br />

in using the data.<br />

In addition to the defects inherent in the basic census<br />

data, estimates of population suffer also from lack of<br />

comparability in quality. To evaluate this factor, reference<br />

should be made to the "type-of-estimate" code described<br />

on p. 16. The classification of 1956 estimates by<br />

this code may be found in Table 1, and it may be assumed<br />

that the code is generally applicable to other postcensal<br />

estimates unless the post-censa1 period is excessively<br />

long.<br />

Further to these general qualifications are the special<br />

problems of comparability which arise in relation to age<br />

statistics in particular. Age-sex distributions of population<br />

are known to suffer from certain deficiencies which<br />

have their origin in underenumeration of infants and in<br />

irregularities in age reporting. A discussion of these irregularities<br />

together with a description of the procedures<br />

for testing age accuracy and the results of its application<br />

to single-year-of-age data are given on p. 17. Although<br />

some of the irregularities in the age statistics tend to be<br />

obscured or eliminated when data are tabulated in 5-year<br />

age groups, precision still continues to be affected, though<br />

the degree of distortion is not always readily seen. The<br />

classification of age distribution by Whipple's Index<br />

given in the 1955 and 1956 Demographic Yearbooks will<br />

thus continue to serve as a guide to the evaluation of<br />

age-sex accuracy in Table 4.<br />

Another limitation on comparability is found in the<br />

basis for the age classification employed by the various<br />

countries. Whenever it was known that the classification<br />

was based on other than age at last birthday, the data are<br />

so noted in the tables and allowance should be made for<br />

this factor in using the data.<br />

Deviations from the standard age classification of the<br />

ta ble are shown by bracketing and footnotes. Although<br />

precise international comparability of specific age groups<br />

is often lacking, the data are nevertheless included because<br />

of their basic value for the area concerned. This is<br />

particularly true for African areas; since statistics for<br />

these territories have not been generally available until<br />

recent years, the results of sample censuses and others<br />

employing unconventional methodology are included because<br />

of the scarcity of information for this continent.<br />

In connexion with the age classification, it should be<br />

noted that zero frequency reported in the unknown-age<br />

category is not always an indication of perfect age reporting-,<br />

but may be an indication that ages have been assigned<br />

before tabulation began. The method of age allocation<br />

!s not always known and hence it is noted infrequently<br />

III the tables, but the possibility of its having occurred<br />

should not be overlooked.<br />

Table 5<br />

Table 5 presents the latest estimate or enumeration of<br />

population in the national capital of each country irrespective<br />

of size, together with that in cities having at<br />

least 100,000 inhabitants.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!