08.06.2013 Views

1957 - United Nations Statistics Division

1957 - United Nations Statistics Division

1957 - United Nations Statistics Division

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2 Substantially accurate statistics of births and deaths;<br />

doubtful or deficient data on migratory movements,<br />

or no account taken of such movements.<br />

3 Birth and death statistics of undetermined reliability<br />

(adequacy of migration data is disregarded).<br />

4 Birth and death statistics which are stated to be deficient<br />

(adequacy of migration data is disregarded).<br />

5 Mathematical extrapolation (or interpolation), at<br />

least three censuses having been taken since 1900.<br />

6 Mathematical extrapolation (or interpolation), less<br />

than three censuses having been taken since 1900.<br />

7 Assumed rates of increase not derived by mathematical<br />

extrapolation.<br />

S None, base figure being held constant.<br />

Method of adjustment not ascertained.<br />

Alphabetic part: The arrangement of letters and numerals<br />

in the classification scheme follows, in general,<br />

a descending scale of reliability.<br />

The code "RO" indicates that the estimates were obtained<br />

directly from a continuous population register and that<br />

they may be regarded as of the first order of reliability.<br />

For present purposes, a continuous population register is<br />

defined as a registration system which maintains an individual<br />

file for each person in the population, a record<br />

being added for each birth, a record being removed for<br />

each death, and provision being made for the transfer of<br />

records with changes of residence. The accuracy of estimates<br />

obtained directly from such registers is relatively<br />

independent of the periodicity or recency of population<br />

censuses or of the reliability of birth and death statistics.<br />

Therefore, generally speaking, continuous registers lead<br />

to estimates which are superior to those derived from<br />

censuses.<br />

Estimates based on census enumerations are coded "A",<br />

"B", or "C", according to the date of the last census, as<br />

indicated above. No qualitative distinction among censuses<br />

has been attempted, but it should be understood<br />

that not all censuses are of comparable accuracy.<br />

Estimates based on non-censal counts or partial censuses<br />

are coded "n". This category covers a fairly wide<br />

range of types, including ration registrations, tax lists,<br />

hut counts, partial enumerations and group enumerations<br />

such as are made in a number of African areas where<br />

the household, tribe, or village serves as the unit for counting.<br />

The accuracy of these counts varies considerably,<br />

but as a group they may be regarded as yielding results<br />

inferior to those generally obtained by the census method<br />

of individual enumeration. In the case of annual counts<br />

(coded "nO"), the yearly repetition of the operation is<br />

likely to lead to improved accuracy.<br />

Estimates based on conjectures or guesses as to population<br />

size made at some time in the past are coded "E".<br />

Such estimates should be regarded merely as rough indications<br />

of probable population size.<br />

Numerical part: The numerical part of the code distinguishes<br />

three types of time adjustment. The first type,<br />

that is, adjustment on the basis of statistics of births,<br />

deaths, and migration, is coded "I" if the data are held by<br />

official and other reliable sources to be substantially accurate,<br />

"2" if the components of natural increase are<br />

substantially adequate but the adjustment for migration<br />

either is not made or is based on inadequate information,<br />

"3" if the birth and death data are of unknown reliabiI-<br />

17<br />

ity, and "4" if they are known to be deficient. In the case<br />

of "3" or "4", the quality of the migration data is disregarded.<br />

The second type, mathematical interpolation or extrapolation<br />

of two or more population counts is, on the<br />

whole, an inferior method as compared with the first<br />

type, except in cases where vital statistics or migration<br />

data are deficient. The type of curve selected and the<br />

length of the intercensal or postcensal interval also have<br />

some bearing on the accuracy of the estimates obtained<br />

by this method. Since the availability of more than two<br />

census counts gives more information on past trends in<br />

popUlation growth and more latitude in the choice of<br />

curves, a distinction is made between countries having<br />

had at least three censuses since 1900 (coded "5") and<br />

those having had less than three (coded "6").<br />

The third type of adjustment, an assumed rate of increase<br />

not derived by mathematical interpolation or<br />

extrapolation, is coded "7". Estimates obtained in this<br />

way may contain large errors, especially if the process is<br />

continued over a long period of time. However, this is<br />

a method that, in general, is applied only in cases where<br />

neither the base data nor available information on population<br />

change permit the use of a more reliable method.<br />

An estimate held constant at the value for the base date<br />

is usually of the lowest order of reliability and is coded<br />

"S". It often represents lack of information both as to<br />

popUlation size and as to rates of change. 5<br />

Reliability of code: Even though it is possible to grade<br />

roughly the two components of the code, the various<br />

combinations of letters and numerals do not lend themselves<br />

to a precise gradation from the most reliable to<br />

the least reliable. This is so not only because of the<br />

factors mentioned in the preceding paragraphs, but also<br />

because a given set of estimates may have a favourable<br />

position with respect to one part of the code and a less<br />

favourable position with respect to the other part. It is<br />

difficult, if not impossible, to rank such cases on a reliability.<br />

scale. However, it may be stated with some<br />

certainty that combinations of "R", "A" and "B" with<br />

"0", "I" and "2" indicate a relatively high level of<br />

reliability, that combinations of letters and numerals at<br />

the lower end of the scale indicate a low level of reliability,<br />

and that other combinations represent a rather<br />

wide variation in levels of reliability.<br />

Applicability of code: Although the code appears in<br />

Table I only, it refers to the estimates for 1956 wherever<br />

they appear. For countries with a regular history of censustaking,<br />

it is probably safe to assume that the method<br />

given applies also throughout the post-war series 1947­<br />

1955. But for the many areas in which the first census in<br />

many years was taken recently, the code is applicable only<br />

to the post-censal estimates and, even for these, it decreases<br />

in applicability as the post-censal period is<br />

lengthened.<br />

Age and sex reporting<br />

<strong>Statistics</strong> classified by age and sex are presented in 14<br />

tables of this Yearbook. Table 4 presents enumerated and<br />

5 For a more detailed discussion of the elements of the code, see<br />

Methods of Estimating Total Population for Current Dates, Manual 1<br />

of Manuals on methods of estimating population. <strong>United</strong> <strong>Nations</strong>. Department<br />

of Social Affairs. Population <strong>Division</strong>, document STjSOAj<br />

Series A, Population Studies No. 10, New York 1952. 45 p.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!