21.04.2013 Views

ETTC'2003 - SEE

ETTC'2003 - SEE

ETTC'2003 - SEE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

detector, synchronous decorrelation multiuser detector and conventional detector. It is seen from<br />

it that the output SNR of conventional detector (without cancellation of MAI) degrades quickly<br />

along with the active users increase. When the system has few users, the conventional detector has<br />

better performance than the Quasi-synchronous multiuser detector because the new noise vector of<br />

R -1. N is introduction. When the number of users increase, the DF of the conventional detector<br />

increase significantly, the DF of the Quasi-synchronous multiuser detector and the synchronous<br />

decorrelation multiuser detector almost keep a constant. It’s shown that the output SNR<br />

degradation of the Quasi-synchronous multiuser detector is larger 0.8dB and 1.7dB than the<br />

synchronous decorrelation multiuser detector for relative time delay tk=10Tc and tk=20Tc<br />

respectively, this is the cost of correlation time truncation.<br />

Fig.4 shows the output SNR as a<br />

function<br />

of relative time delay. Where<br />

the input SNR is 20 dB, the number of<br />

users is 20. We can know from Fig.4<br />

that the relative time delay varied<br />

from 10Tc to 20Tc, resulting the DF<br />

of the Quasi-synchronous multiuser<br />

detector is 0.8dB~1.7dB larger than<br />

that of the synchronous decorrelation<br />

multiuser detector, and the DF of<br />

conventional detector is 7 dB larger<br />

than that of the synchronous<br />

decorrelation multiuser detector.<br />

Conclusion:<br />

In the asynchronous<br />

DS/CDMA data transmission system, signal is transmitted<br />

synchronously<br />

and arrived to the reception station asynchronously. The Quasi-synchronous<br />

References:<br />

Fig.4 Output SNR vs. relative time delay<br />

multiuser detector can be used to reduce the computation complexity. It has good near-far<br />

resistance performance because it needn’t amplitude information of users. So in some telemetry<br />

System applications, The Quasi-synchronous multiuser detector is a good approach for multiuser<br />

detection.<br />

[1] B.G.Agee,K.Cohen,J.H.Reed,and<br />

T.C.Hsia “Simulation performance of a blind adaptive array<br />

for a realistic mobile channel” in proc, 43 rd VTC.pp197-100. 1993.<br />

[2] A.Naguib,A.Poulraj ,T.Kailath , “Capacity imporement with base-station<br />

antenna arrays in<br />

cellular CDMA”,IEEE Trans on VT.VOL. VT-43 pp691-698. 1994.<br />

[3] S.Verdu, “Minimum probability of error for synchronous Gaussian<br />

IEEE Trans. On IT ,VOL.IT-32.pp85-96.1986.<br />

multi-accsee channels”<br />

[4] R.Lupas and S.Verdu. “Linear Multiuser Detectors<br />

for Synchronous Code-Division<br />

Multiple-Access Channels” IEEE Trans. On IT. VOL.IT-35,No.1,pp123-136.1989。<br />

[5] R.Lupas and S.Verdu. “Near-far resistance of multiuser detector in asynchronous channels.”<br />

IEEE Trans. On COM. VOL.COM-38,No.4,pp496-508.1990.<br />

[6] Akihiro Kajiwara and Masao Nakagawa, “Microcellular CDMA<br />

System with a Linear

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!