ETTC'2003 - SEE
ETTC'2003 - SEE ETTC'2003 - SEE
At equipment level EMC TEST PROGRAM When an equipment has been previously qualified for another project and will be used for a new program without modification, then only those tests, or parts of tests, for which the equipment has not yet demonstrated compliance are performed, provided that full visibility of the previous test specifications and test results is available. When an equipment is modified to meet requirements, then the degree of re-testing and any additional testing is defined. The test requirements for units, based on the allowed limits defined in the EMC part of the equipment environment test requirements, include: conducted emission (sine and transient), conducted susceptibility (sine and transient), radiated emission, radiated susceptibility and ESD. These tests are made as early as possible in the program on the first available model that is electrically representative of the flight unit. Tests on later models are not normally performed unless the equipment design is changed or EMC modifications have to be made. At repeater level The radiated tests are of the "sniff" (radiated emission located at connection/unit level) & "snort" (radiated susceptibility located at connection/unit level) type, and as such they provide an easy possibility of tracing the RF level to its source. The tests are performed at the worst case in receive and transmit bands. These tests are not intended to duplicate, but rather to confirm and complement the equipment tests already performed in order to check that no RF connection performed on the communication module during the AIT sequence presents abnormal RF leakage level. At system level The purpose is to verify safety margins in conducted and radiated mode, the compatibility with the launcher & the launch facility and the RF auto-compatibility. Conducted mode The aim of these conducted emissions and conducted susceptibility tests is to verify that the different functional chains of the satellite are mutually compatible for the conducted mode with sufficient safety margins in all the spacecraft operating modes. It is demonstrated an operating margin of at least: - Main power buses: 6 dB - Pyrotechnic devices: 20 dB Radiated mode The radiated emissions by the satellite in launch configuration shall be below the limits defined by the launch authority. These limits are dependant on the launch site and launch vehicle. The radiated susceptibility test goal is to check that the satellite continues to operate in accordance with the relevant system performance specification when it is submitted to a narrow-band and/or broadband electric fields in the launcher site & vehicle frequency range. The field strength is dependant on the used launcher. RF auto-compatibility 4
During this test, the satellite is in a RF configuration as near as possible of the flight configuration; particularly the antennae are used at their nominal power. The RF functional characteristics are measured by verifying the emitted spectrum spurious, PIMP and the on-board sensitivity. During the RF auto-compatibility tests execution (full payload up to saturation pending on Anechoïc chamber capability), all sub-systems behaviours are checked. This allows to detect, if any, workmanship problems. The electric field inside the satellite and at external unit level are also measured; this allows to demonstrate the system margin with regards to the equipment radiated susceptibility level. RF Auto-compatibility test (Astrium property) Reference [RD1] MIL STD 461E : "Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic Interference Characteristics of Subsystems and Equipment" August 99. [RD2] MIL STD 1541 : "Electromagnetic compatibility requirements for space systems" - October 1973. [RD3] "Design guidelines for assessing and controlling spacecraft charging effects" C. Purvis, H.B. Garret; N.J. Stevens. NASA technical paper 2361 (1984) [RD4] "Specification de l'environnement de l'orbite géostationnaire" CERT/DERTS Report °423500, RF - J. Berry, L. Levy, J.P. Philippon 5
- Page 304 and 305: 4.2 DEFINITION DE L'ANTENNE DE MISE
- Page 306 and 307: 4.4 DEFINITION DE L'ANTENNE DE REFE
- Page 308 and 309: 5.1.2 Diagrammes de rayonnement 5.1
- Page 310 and 311: 5.2 ANTENNE DE REFERENCE BANDE P 5.
- Page 312 and 313: Gain (dBi) 5.2.2.2 Résultats Ils s
- Page 314 and 315: Comme attendu, la coupe xOz présen
- Page 316 and 317: Gain (dBi) 5.3.2 diagramme de rayon
- Page 318 and 319: Gain (dBi) 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20
- Page 320 and 321: BACK INTRODUCTION MESURE DE CHAMP P
- Page 322 and 323: MESURE DE CHAMP PAR SYSTEME PORTABL
- Page 324 and 325: MESURE DE CHAMP PAR SYSTEME PORTABL
- Page 326 and 327: Abstract Helicopters are relatively
- Page 328 and 329: Au sol, la station réceptionne le
- Page 330 and 331: BACK Résumé Architecture d’une
- Page 332 and 333: Architecture type lanceur lourd ARI
- Page 334 and 335: Architecture petit lanceur L’arch
- Page 336 and 337: Diagramme de l’UCTM Voies analogi
- Page 338 and 339: Exemples de capteurs utilisés Type
- Page 340 and 341: SESSION 8 : COMPATIBILITE ELECTROMA
- Page 342 and 343: 1. CONTEXTE GENERAL Le durcissement
- Page 344 and 345: Figure 1 : Actions de qualification
- Page 346 and 347: 5. LES PARAMETRES D’OPTIMISATION
- Page 348 and 349: 7. PERFORMANCE ET OPTIMISATION DU P
- Page 350 and 351: La qualification du durcissement re
- Page 352 and 353: UNIT Unit EMC documents : - groundi
- Page 356 and 357: BACK ETTC 2003. Le rôle de la simu
- Page 358 and 359: comprenant des objets complexes, n
- Page 360 and 361: Cette approche permet, avec les mê
- Page 362 and 363: Les Thèses ONERA UPS Prise en comp
- Page 364 and 365: Pression Ligne bifilaire non blind
- Page 366 and 367: 1.8 1,8 Tension continue V 1.6 1.4
- Page 368 and 369: 270 Ω I0 IL 2,7 kΩ (b) Alimenta
- Page 370 and 371: What is the budget of the statistic
- Page 372 and 373: Monte Carlo approach: This is a thr
- Page 374 and 375: 2 Etat de l’art des standards de
- Page 376 and 377: 2.1.6 Emissions standards 61967 par
- Page 378 and 379: - Limites pour l’immunité DPI (e
- Page 380 and 381: PRESENTATIONS POSTER / POSTER PRESE
- Page 382 and 383: BACK LA TELEMESURE SUR AIRBUS JC GH
- Page 384 and 385: Dans le cycle d ’essais en vol ,
- Page 386 and 387: CONCLUSION - NOS BESOINS FUTURS AIR
- Page 388 and 389: LOGICIELS DE MESURE ET DE TRAITEMEN
- Page 390 and 391: LOGICIELS DE MESURE ET DE TRAITEMEN
- Page 392 and 393: LOGICIELS DE MESURE ET DE TRAITEMEN
- Page 394 and 395: In order to optimize the phase nois
- Page 396 and 397: Photo-oscillator active device Opti
- Page 398 and 399: the inverse of N×N correlation mat
- Page 400 and 401: quasi-synchronous multiuser detecto
- Page 402 and 403: Multiuser Interference Canceler ”
At equipment level<br />
EMC TEST PROGRAM<br />
When an equipment has been previously qualified for another project and will be used for a new<br />
program without modification, then only those tests, or parts of tests, for which the equipment has not<br />
yet demonstrated compliance are performed, provided that full visibility of the previous test<br />
specifications and test results is available. When an equipment is modified to meet requirements, then<br />
the degree of re-testing and any additional testing is defined.<br />
The test requirements for units, based on the allowed limits defined in the EMC part of the equipment<br />
environment test requirements, include: conducted emission (sine and transient), conducted<br />
susceptibility (sine and transient), radiated emission, radiated susceptibility and ESD. These tests are<br />
made as early as possible in the program on the first available model that is electrically representative<br />
of the flight unit. Tests on later models are not normally performed unless the equipment design is<br />
changed or EMC modifications have to be made.<br />
At repeater level<br />
The radiated tests are of the "sniff" (radiated emission located at connection/unit level) & "snort"<br />
(radiated susceptibility located at connection/unit level) type, and as such they provide an easy<br />
possibility of tracing the RF level to its source. The tests are performed at the worst case in receive and<br />
transmit bands. These tests are not intended to duplicate, but rather to confirm and complement the<br />
equipment tests already performed in order to check that no RF connection performed on the<br />
communication module during the AIT sequence presents abnormal RF leakage level.<br />
At system level<br />
The purpose is to verify safety margins in conducted and radiated mode, the compatibility with the<br />
launcher & the launch facility and the RF auto-compatibility.<br />
Conducted mode<br />
The aim of these conducted emissions and conducted susceptibility tests is to verify that the different<br />
functional chains of the satellite are mutually compatible for the conducted mode with sufficient safety<br />
margins in all the spacecraft operating modes. It is demonstrated an operating margin of at least:<br />
- Main power buses: 6 dB<br />
- Pyrotechnic devices: 20 dB<br />
Radiated mode<br />
The radiated emissions by the satellite in launch configuration shall be below the limits defined by the<br />
launch authority. These limits are dependant on the launch site and launch vehicle.<br />
The radiated susceptibility test goal is to check that the satellite continues to operate in accordance<br />
with the relevant system performance specification when it is submitted to a narrow-band and/or<br />
broadband electric fields in the launcher site & vehicle frequency range. The field strength is<br />
dependant on the used launcher.<br />
RF auto-compatibility<br />
4