03.04.2013 Views

Lignes directrices sur la prise en charge du saignement ... - SOGC

Lignes directrices sur la prise en charge du saignement ... - SOGC

Lignes directrices sur la prise en charge du saignement ... - SOGC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

les symptômes persist<strong>en</strong>t, mais qui ont eu des résultats de tests<br />

négatifs, doiv<strong>en</strong>t être examinées de nouveau. (II B)<br />

5. Les progestatifs pris <strong>du</strong>rant <strong>la</strong> phase lutéale des cycles m<strong>en</strong>struels<br />

ovu<strong>la</strong>toires ré<strong>du</strong>is<strong>en</strong>t efficacem<strong>en</strong>t les saignem<strong>en</strong>ts<br />

m<strong>en</strong>struels réguliers excessifs. (I A)<br />

6. Alors que <strong>la</strong> di<strong>la</strong>tation-curetage (DC) peut jouer un rôle dans<br />

le diagnostic, elle n’offre pas une thérapie efficace pour les<br />

femmes ayant des saignem<strong>en</strong>ts m<strong>en</strong>struels excessifs. (II B)<br />

7. L’<strong>en</strong>domètre peut être éliminé par diverses techniques, mais<br />

l’ab<strong>la</strong>tion par « rollerball » <strong>en</strong>traîne un taux d’interv<strong>en</strong>tion<br />

répétée après cinq ans al<strong>la</strong>nt jusqu’à 40 pour c<strong>en</strong>t. Cette technique<br />

doit être réservée aux femmes qui ne sont plus <strong>en</strong> âge<br />

de procréer et qui sont consci<strong>en</strong>tes <strong>du</strong> risque de réapparition<br />

des saignem<strong>en</strong>ts. (I A)<br />

RÉFÉRENCES<br />

J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2001;23(8):710-6<br />

1. Munro MG.Abnormal uterine bleeding in the repro<strong>du</strong>ctive years. Part<br />

1: pathog<strong>en</strong>esis and clinical investigations. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparoscop<br />

1999;6:391-428.<br />

2. Hallberg L, Hogdahl A, Nilsson L, Rybo G. M<strong>en</strong>strual blood loss: a popu<strong>la</strong>tion<br />

study.Variations at differ<strong>en</strong>t ages and attempts to define normality.Acta<br />

Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996;45:320-51.<br />

3. Coh<strong>en</strong> JM, Gibor Y.Anemia and m<strong>en</strong>strual blood loss. Obstet Gynecol<br />

Surv 1980;35:597-618.<br />

4. Fedele I, Bianchi S, Dorta M, Brioschi D, Zanotti F,Vercellini P.Transvaginal<br />

ultrasonography versus hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of uterine<br />

submucous myomas. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:745-8.<br />

5. Diikuiz<strong>en</strong> FP, Brolmann HA, Potters AE, Bingers NY, Heinz AP.The accuracy<br />

of transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of <strong>en</strong>dometrial<br />

abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:345-9.<br />

6. Sp<strong>en</strong>cer CP,Whitehead MI. Endometrial assessm<strong>en</strong>t re-visited (a<br />

review). Br J Obstet Gynecol 1999;106:623-32.<br />

7. Farquhar CM, Lethaby A, Sowter M,Verry J, Baranyai J.An evaluation of<br />

risk factors for <strong>en</strong>dometrial hyperp<strong>la</strong>sia in prem<strong>en</strong>opausal wom<strong>en</strong> with<br />

abnormal m<strong>en</strong>strual bleeding.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:525-9.<br />

8. Bal<strong>la</strong>rd-Barbash R, Swanson CA. Body weight: Estimation of risk for<br />

breast and <strong>en</strong>dometrial cancer.Am J Clinical Nutrition 1996;63:437-41.<br />

9. Gibson M. Repro<strong>du</strong>ctive health and polycystic ovary syndrome.Am J<br />

Med 1995;98:67-75.<br />

10. Morgan RW. Risk of <strong>en</strong>dometrial cancer after tamoxif<strong>en</strong> treatm<strong>en</strong>t.<br />

Oncology 1997;11: 25-33.<br />

11. Barakat RR. B<strong>en</strong>ign and hyperp<strong>la</strong>stic <strong>en</strong>dmetrial changes associated<br />

with tamoxif<strong>en</strong> use. Oncology 1997;1:35-7.<br />

12. Brand A, Dubuc-Lissoir J, Ehl<strong>en</strong> T, P<strong>la</strong>nte M. Diagnosis of <strong>en</strong>dometrial<br />

cancer in wom<strong>en</strong> with abnormal vaginal bleeding. J Soc Obstet<br />

Gynaecol Can 2000;22(2):102-4.<br />

13. Guido RS, Kanbour-Shakir A, Rulin MC, Christopherson WA. Pipelle<br />

<strong>en</strong>dometrial sampling: s<strong>en</strong>sitivity in the detection of <strong>en</strong>dometrial cancer.<br />

J Reprod Med 1995;33:76-8.<br />

14. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Hysteroscopic<br />

Surgery:A National Clinical Guideline. Edinburgh, 1999.<br />

15. Ferry J, Farnsworth A,Webster M,Wr<strong>en</strong> B.The efficacy of pipelle<br />

<strong>en</strong>dometrial biopsy in detecting <strong>en</strong>dometrial cancer.Aust N ZJ<br />

Obstet Gynaecol 1993;33:76-8.<br />

16. Emanuel MH,Verdel MJ,Wamsteker K, Lannes FB.A prospective<br />

comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and diagnostic<br />

hysteroscopy in the evaluation of pati<strong>en</strong>ts with abnormal uterine<br />

bleeding.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:547-52.<br />

17. Goldrath MH, Sherman AI. Office hysteroscopy and suction curettage:<br />

JOGC 6<br />

AOÛT 2001<br />

can we eliminate the hospital diagnostic di<strong>la</strong>tation and curettage? Am J<br />

Obstet Gynecol 1985;152:220-9.<br />

18. Towbin N, Gviazda I, March C. Office hysteroscopy versus transvaginal<br />

ultrasonography in the evaluation of pati<strong>en</strong>ts with excessive uterine<br />

bleeding.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1678-82.<br />

19. Loffer FD. Hysteroscopy with selective <strong>en</strong>dometrial sampling compared<br />

with D&C for abnormal uterine bleeding: the value of negative hysteroscopic<br />

view. Obstet Gynecol 1989;73:16-20.<br />

20. Nagele F, O’Connor H, Davies A, Badaery A, Mohamed H, Magos A. 2500<br />

outpati<strong>en</strong>t diagnostic hysteroscopies. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:87-92.<br />

21. Grimes D. Diagnostic di<strong>la</strong>tation and curettage: a reappraisal.Am J<br />

Obstet Gynecol 1982;142:1-6.<br />

22. MacK<strong>en</strong>zie I, Bibby J. Critical assessm<strong>en</strong>t of di<strong>la</strong>tation and curettage in<br />

1029 wom<strong>en</strong>. Lancet 1978;2:566-8.<br />

23. Vercellini P, Cortesi I, Oldani S, Moschetta M, DeGiorgi O, Crosignani<br />

PG.The role of transvaginal ultrasonography and outpati<strong>en</strong>t diagnostic<br />

hysteroscopy in the evaluation of pati<strong>en</strong>ts with m<strong>en</strong>orrhagia. Hum<br />

Reprod 1997;12:1768-71.<br />

24. Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske K, Feldstein V, Subak L, Scheidler J, Segal<br />

M, et al. Endovaginal ultrasound to exclude <strong>en</strong>dometrial cancer and<br />

other <strong>en</strong>dometrial abnormalities. J Am Med Assoc 1998;280:1510-7.<br />

25. Langer RD, Pierce JJ, O’Han<strong>la</strong>n KA, Johnson SR, Espe<strong>la</strong>nd MA,Trabal JF,<br />

et al.Transvaginal ultrasonography compared with <strong>en</strong>dometrial biopsy<br />

for the detection of <strong>en</strong>dometrial disease. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1792-8.<br />

26. Tsuda H, Kawabata M,Yamamoto K, Inoue T, Umesaki N. Prospective<br />

study to compare <strong>en</strong>dometrial cytology and transvaginal ultrasonography<br />

for id<strong>en</strong>tification of <strong>en</strong>dometrial malignancies. Gynecol Oncol<br />

1997;65:383-6.<br />

27. Widrich T, Bradley LD, Mitchinson AR, Colins RI. Comparison of saline<br />

infusion sonography with office hysteroscopy for the evaluation of the<br />

<strong>en</strong>dometrium.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1327-34.<br />

28. Wolman I, Jaffa A, Hartoov J, Bar-Am A, David M. S<strong>en</strong>sitivity and<br />

specificity of sonohysterography for the evaluation of the uterine<br />

cavity in perim<strong>en</strong>opausal pati<strong>en</strong>ts. J Ultrasound Med 1996;15:285-8.<br />

29. Bronz L, Sutter T, Rusca T.The value of transvaginal sonography with<br />

and without saline instil<strong>la</strong>tion in the diagnosis of uterine pathology in<br />

pre-and postm<strong>en</strong>opausal wom<strong>en</strong> with abnormal bleeding or suspect<br />

sonographic findings. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9:53-8.<br />

30. Schwarzler P, Concin H, Bosch H, Berlinger A,Wohlg<strong>en</strong>annt K,<br />

Collins WP, et al.An evaluation of sonohysterography and diagnostic<br />

hysteroscopy for the assessm<strong>en</strong>t of intrauterine pathology. Ultrasound<br />

Obstet Gynecol 1998;11:337-42.<br />

31. Smith SK,Abel MH, Kelly RW, Baird DT. Prostag<strong>la</strong>ndin synthesis in the<br />

<strong>en</strong>dometrium of wom<strong>en</strong> with ovu<strong>la</strong>r dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Br J<br />

Obstet Gynecol 1981;88:434-42.<br />

32. Elder MG. Prostag<strong>la</strong>ndins and m<strong>en</strong>strual disorders. Br J Obstet Gynecol<br />

1993;287:703-4.<br />

33. National Health Committee, New Zea<strong>la</strong>nd. Guidelines for the Managem<strong>en</strong>t<br />

of Heavy M<strong>en</strong>strual Bleeding. Christchurch: 1998.<br />

34. Munro MG.Abnormal uterine bleeding in the repro<strong>du</strong>ctive years. Part<br />

II: Medical managem<strong>en</strong>t. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparoscop 2000;7:17-35.<br />

35. Edlund M,Andersson K, Rybo G, Lindoff C,Astedt B, von Schoultz B.<br />

Re<strong>du</strong>ction of m<strong>en</strong>strual blood loss in wom<strong>en</strong> suffering from idiopathic<br />

m<strong>en</strong>orrhagia with a novel antifibrinolytic (Kubi 2161). Br J Obstet<br />

Gynecol 1995;102:913-7.<br />

36. Call<strong>en</strong>der ST,Warner GT, Cope E.Treatm<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong>orrhagia with<br />

tranexamic acid: a double-blind trial. Br Med J 1970;24:214-6.<br />

37. Barbieri RL, Ryan KJ. Danazol: <strong>en</strong>docrine pharmacology and therapeutic<br />

applications.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981;141:453-63.<br />

38. Lamb MP. Danazol in m<strong>en</strong>orrhagia:A double blind p<strong>la</strong>cebo controlled<br />

trial. J Obstet Gynecol 1987;7:212-6.<br />

39. Need JA, Forbes KL, Mi<strong>la</strong>zzo L, McK<strong>en</strong>zie E. Danazol in the treatm<strong>en</strong>t<br />

of m<strong>en</strong>orrhagia: the effect of a 1 month in<strong>du</strong>ction dose (200 mg) and 2<br />

month’s maint<strong>en</strong>ance therapy (200 mg, 100 mg, 50 mg or p<strong>la</strong>cebo).<br />

Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol 1992;32:346-52.<br />

40. Bon<strong>du</strong>elle M,Walker JJ, Calder AA.A comparative study of danazol and<br />

norethisterone in dysfunctional uterine bleeding pres<strong>en</strong>ting as m<strong>en</strong>orrhagia.<br />

Postgrad Med J 1991;67:833-6.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!