Nuorisobarometri_2012_Verkkojulkaisu
Nuorisobarometri_2012_Verkkojulkaisu
Nuorisobarometri_2012_Verkkojulkaisu
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
article abStractS<br />
YOUNg peOple’S FAMilY<br />
bAcKgROUNDS AND<br />
pOliticiSAtiON AccORDiNg tO<br />
tHe YOUtH bAROMeteR StUDY<br />
Tuukka Tomperi<br />
The article deals with the family’s influence<br />
on the political socialisation of young people,<br />
meaning the formation of their political attitudes<br />
and opinions. The topic has been the subject of<br />
many studies in a number of countries in recent<br />
years, and has become a matter of interest in<br />
Finland too. It is known from previous studies<br />
that one’s family background exerts influences<br />
on one’s politics. The article will focus on<br />
what the <strong>2012</strong> Youth Barometer data reveals<br />
about young people’s political opinions and<br />
how they are affected by family background and<br />
their parents. The paper looks at the attitudes<br />
that young people and their parents have in<br />
common, the family’s conversation patterns,<br />
and the family’s social status and resources.<br />
Resources are divided into financial, social and<br />
cultural capital, and the question is how they<br />
affect political capital. The data reveals that if<br />
families discuss politics, it is very likely that<br />
young people will develop an interest in politics<br />
too. Furthermore, if young people are aware of<br />
their parents’ political attitudes they are more<br />
likely to become interested in politics, perhaps<br />
as a result of the family’s conversations and<br />
the way that the parents express their political<br />
views openly and actively. The parents’ levels<br />
of education also seems to be connected to<br />
248<br />
young people’s interest in politics, although not<br />
as much as the previously-mentioned factors.<br />
iN wHAt wAY iS beiNg<br />
DiSADVANtAgeD iNHeRiteD?<br />
Matti Kortteinen & Marko Elovainio<br />
The article studies the question of whether<br />
marginalization is linked to learned elements<br />
that are inherited and, if so, what is “inherited”?<br />
The starting point for the paper is the recent<br />
international literature on the so-called culture<br />
of poverty (Small e.g. 2010) and previous<br />
Finnish research (Kortteinen & Tuomikoski<br />
1998, Kortteinen & Elovainio 2005). The data<br />
comes from the Youth Barometer <strong>2012</strong> study,<br />
in which 1902 young people and 597 of their<br />
parents were interviewed. The analysis focuses<br />
on examining the kind of indicator which<br />
conversely depicts the successful socialization<br />
of young people, namely social disintegration.<br />
Successful socialization means e.g. that young<br />
people have learned to trust other people and<br />
commonly-agreed rules, morals and friendships<br />
mean something to them. The analysis<br />
demonstrates that societal disintegration is<br />
passed down from parent to child and it explains<br />
young people’s low grades in school. The issue<br />
does not however seem to be the” inheritance”<br />
of the so-called poverty culture but rather the<br />
collapse of collective and established values.<br />
The result is thus that this kind of social and<br />
cultural collapse seems to be inherited through<br />
the generations and plays a part in the process in<br />
which marginalization is “inherited”. The end<br />
the article has a discussion on the socio-political<br />
meaning of the results.<br />
VOlUNtARY ActiVitY iN YOUNg<br />
peOple’S iDeAS AND MOtiVeS<br />
Elina Kuusisto & Anne Birgitta Pessi<br />
The study looks at voluntary work from young<br />
people’s perspectives. 1902 young people<br />
between the ages of 15 and 29 participated in<br />
the study. Of the participants, 37 % (N=697)<br />
had participated in voluntary work within the