18.02.2013 Views

hLpb5

hLpb5

hLpb5

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WHEREFORE, Chevron prays for judgment as set forth below.<br />

EIGHTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF<br />

(Violations of New York JUdiciary Law § 487)<br />

(Against Defendants Donziger, the Law Offices of Steven R. Donziger and Donziger &<br />

Associates, PLLC)<br />

420. Chevron realleges and incorporates herein by reference each and every foregoing<br />

paragraph of this Amended Complaint as ifset forth in full.<br />

421. New York Judiciary Law § 487 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "An<br />

attorney or counselor who ... [i]s guilty of any deceit or collusion, or consents to any deceit or<br />

collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party ... [i]s guilty of a misdemeanor, and in<br />

addition to the punishment prescribed therefore by the penal law, he forfeits to the party injured<br />

treble damages, to be recovered in a civil action."<br />

422. As set forth above, Donziger, the Law Offices of Steven R. Donziger, and<br />

Donziger & Associates, PLLC engaged in an intentional pattern of collusion, wrongdoing, and<br />

deceit with the intent to deceive both Chevron and multiple federal courts, including the United<br />

States District Court for the Southern District of New York and the United States Court of<br />

Appeals for the Second Circuit.<br />

423. Donziger, the Law Offices of Steven R. Donziger, and Donziger & Associates,<br />

PLLC actively participated in the preparation and filing of multiple court submissions to the<br />

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, which included false and<br />

misleading statements about the Lago Agrio Litigation and the Cabrera Report. Defendants<br />

Donziger and the Law Offices of Steven R. Donziger knowingly caused these misstatements to<br />

be filed with the intent of deceiving this Court and Chevron. As described in paragraphs 304-10,<br />

supra, these misstatements were filed in opposition to Chevron's requests for discovery under 28<br />

U.S.c. § 1782 and in support of the Lago Agrio Plaintiffs' and the Republic of Ecuador's actions<br />

against Chevron seeking to terminate arbitration proceedings.<br />

424. Donziger and the Law Offices of Steven R. Donziger tampered with the<br />

testimony of environmental consultant Mark Quarles in furtherance of the Enterprise's scheme.<br />

160

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!