hLpb5

Recommendations

Info

strategic false representations in various pending federal judicial proceedings, with full awareness of their consequence and with the specific intent to corruptly endeavor to influence, obstruct, and impede the due administration of justice, the RICO Defendants have committed multiple instances of obstruction of justice in violation of 18 U.S.c. § 1503. Pattern of Racketeering Activitv: Witness Tampering in Violation 008 Us. C. § 1512 361. Pursuant to a March 2, 2010 order issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia granting Chevron's Section 1782 application, Chevron noticed the deposition of Defendants' expert, Charles W. Calmbacher, Ph.D. 362. Fearing that Dr. Calmbacher would expose the truth about the falsified reports filed in his name by the RICO Defendants, Donziger knowingly engaged in intimidation, threats, misleading conduct, and corrupt persuasion toward Dr. Calmbacher, with the specific intent to influence, delay, and prevent Dr. Calmbacher's testimony or cause Dr. Calmbacher to withhold records, objects, documents, and testimony from an official proceeding. 363. As Dr. Calmbacher testified pursuant to the court-authorized subpoena at his March 29, 20 I 0 deposition, Donziger contacted Dr. Calmbacher and emphatically attempted to convince Dr. Calmbacher not to testify at his deposition, warning him that testifying could pose "real problems" for him and could result in a "potential law case against" him because "they're going to go after [him] for unprofessional behavior." When asked at his deposition whether "Donziger [was] trying to convince [him] not to come and testify," Calmbacher testified: "Very much so. Very much so." Donziger tampered with Dr. Calmbacher's testimony in violation of 18 U.s.c. § 1512 in furtherance of the Enterprise's scheme. 364. The RICO Defendants also tampered with the testimony of environmental consultant Mark Quarles in furtherance of the Enterprise's scheme. In 2007, Ecuador submitted a declaration by Quarles regarding the "independence" of the Cabrera Report in a proceeding pending in the Southern District of New York, using that declaration to support the government's contention that the Lago Agrio Litigation "has proceeded in accordance with rules of procedure 143
under Ecuador law." Quarles has recently admitted in sworn testimony that Donziger paid him for this affidavit, and that he would not have signed the affidavit ifhe had known about the RICO Defendants' involvement with Cabrera. Sy not disclosing the truth about Donziger's improper contact with Cabrera and instead deliberately misleading Quarles, Donziger knowingly engaged in misleading conduct and corrupt persuasion toward Quarles with the intent to influence his testimony in an official proceeding. 365. The RICO Defendants and their co-conspirators also tampered with the potential testimony of numerous Stratus employees in furtherance of the Enterprise's scheme. After Chevron instituted a Section 1782 application in December 2009 seeking discovery from Stratus, Seltman, undoubtedly concerned about potentially damaging future testimony from Stratus employees, knowingly engaged in misleading conduct and corrupt persuasion toward numerous Stratus employees, with the specific intent to influence, delay, and prevent those employees' truthful testimony or cause the employees to withhold records, objects, documents, and testimony from an official proceeding. Seltman repeatedly misrepresented to Stratus staff members that Cabrera was independent and had authored his own report. Seltman likewise repeatedly misled Stratus employees and omitted the true facts when he misrepresented that Stratus had played a limited role of technical advisor to the Lago Agrio Plaintiffs. Thus, Seltman tampered with the Stratus employees' potential or expected testimony in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512, in furtherance ofthe Enterprise's scheme. Summary ofthe Pattern of Racketeering Activity Alleged Against Each RICO De&ndant 366. Defendant Donziger has committed numerous mail and wire fraud violations, including those identified in Appendix S in which Donziger used or caused to be used the mail or wires in furtherance of the RICO Defendants' scheme to defraud. Donziger has also engaged in extortion of Chevron and fraudulent conduct through numerous acts, including by participating in a campaign of public attacks based on false and misleading statements about Chevron and the Lago Agrio Litigation (including making false statements to the U.S. House of 144
Page 2 and 3:
TRIBUNAL DE DISTRITO DE LOS ESTADOS
Page 4 and 5:
ÍNDICE [CERT.GEOTEXT VER: JD] i P
Page 6 and 7:
[CERT.GEOTEXT VER: JD] iii Página
Page 8 and 9:
La demandante Chevron Corporation (
Page 10 and 11:
informe y, en los Estados Unidos, e
Page 12 and 13:
o dirección de la empresa criminal
Page 14 and 15:
16. El Demandado Douglas Beltman (
Page 16 and 17:
el Frente de Defensa de la Amazoní
Page 18 and 19:
Unidos que fueron emprendidos por l
Page 20 and 21:
u. H5 es una sociedad mercantil del
Page 22 and 23:
COMPETENCIA SOBRE EL ASUNTO Y COMPE
Page 24 and 25:
de Nueva York, y hay un nexo sustan
Page 26 and 27:
multitud de llamadas telefónicas,
Page 28 and 29:
eclamaciones de Chevron. Los Demand
Page 30 and 31:
1. TexPet participa en el consorcio
Page 32 and 33:
esteros en gran magnitud. Pero como
Page 34 and 35:
la gente de la región del Oriente
Page 36 and 37:
expresamente liberadas también inc
Page 38 and 39:
trabajos de reparación provista po
Page 40 and 41:
59. En 1993 y 1994, estos abogados
Page 42 and 43:
ganancias de los cuales no benefici
Page 44 and 45:
Agrio. Las líneas de ataque son in
Page 46 and 47:
del gobierno ecuatoriano, los Deman
Page 48 and 49:
temernos para que esto se mueva de
Page 50 and 51:
juez. Esperanza ya se reunió con
Page 52 and 53:
la postura del gobierno de Correa e
Page 54 and 55:
de un escándalo de solicitación d
Page 56 and 57:
en el área del ex consorcio. Fajar
Page 58 and 59:
infundada y exagerada de US$ 6.000
Page 60 and 61:
de Russell todos estos años”, no
Page 62 and 63:
114. En última instancia, los Dema
Page 64 and 65:
121. Si bien desde entonces Chevron
Page 66 and 67:
probablemente le dijeron a Cabrera
Page 68 and 69:
contenido fuera dictado por la mism
Page 70 and 71:
Donziger temió que el llamado del
Page 72 and 73:
*** Larrea: (A Cabrera) Nos gustar
Page 74 and 75:
confabulación delictiva. Donziger
Page 76 and 77:
conspirador William Powers, quien t
Page 78 and 79:
escribió como consultor remunerado
Page 80 and 81:
sus consultores en realidad redacta
Page 82 and 83:
actividades ilícitas. E-Tech tambi
Page 84 and 85:
comentarios. Beltman asimismo expre
Page 86 and 87:
contaminación es mucho más recien
Page 88 and 89:
178. La revisión del Informe Cabre
Page 90 and 91:
182. De manera similar, el 26 de ju
Page 92 and 93:
186. Cabrera obtuvo este dinero jur
Page 94 and 95:
en algunos de los mismos datos que
Page 96 and 97:
[de Cabrera] o [sus] cifras de cost
Page 98 and 99:
anular o restar valor al contrato d
Page 100 and 101:
llamando traidores a los abogados e
Page 102 and 103:
RICO fabricaran el supuestamente
Page 104 and 105:
hacerle la vida tan difícil a la c
Page 106 and 107:
quienes actualmente “viven en la
Page 108 and 109:
ambiental y pobreza. Y los ataques
Page 110 and 111:
de los Demandados RICO, y de las qu
Page 112 and 113:
científicos independientes”. Ese
Page 114 and 115:
comunitarios”, y Fajardo fue gala
Page 116 and 117:
equipo que “síganles repitiendol
Page 118 and 119:
en referencia a la carta del 4 de m
Page 120 and 121:
el propio peso de las pruebas”. Y
Page 122 and 123:
254. Además, los conspiradores han
Page 124 and 125:
e. Los Demandados RICO acusan falsa
Page 126 and 127:
dejar la falsa impresión de que Ch
Page 128 and 129:
evelan se detallan a continuación.
Page 130 and 131:
un excelente trabajo al no recordar
Page 132 and 133:
tergiversaciones ante el Tribunal d
Page 134 and 135:
Stratus”, describió actividades
Page 136 and 137:
compareciendo como asesor jurídico
Page 138 and 139:
En sus estimados totales, la tabla
Page 140 and 141:
circunstancias que rodeaban a la pr
Page 142 and 143:
de distracción. Por ejemplo, han i
Page 144 and 145:
2. Realización de declaraciones fa
Page 146 and 147:
Dr. Cabrera asignó un equipo de 14
Page 148 and 149:
adjuntaba un borrador de la declara
Page 150 and 151:
directamente, sin adornos”. El Ju
Page 152 and 153:
325. El 14 de febrero de 2011, la c
Page 154 and 155:
las descripciones de los documentos
Page 156 and 157:
La relación con Burford fue en gra
Page 158 and 159:
333. Por medio de declaraciones hec
Page 160 and 161:
Demandados RICO han presentado decl
Page 162 and 163:
para estafar y extorsionar a Chevro
Page 164 and 165:
organismos gubernamentales, y el co
Page 166 and 167:
a. mensajes por correo electrónico
Page 168 and 169:
Patrón de las actividades de extor
Page 170 and 171:
en el testimonio del Dr. Calmbacher
Page 172 and 173:
demorar y evitar el testimonio del
Page 174 and 175:
transporten, transmitan o transfier
Page 176 and 177:
RICO. Finalmente, Stratus ha partic
Page 178 and 179:
los contratos firmados, incluido el
Page 180 and 181:
espaldo de esa conspiración, y de
Page 182 and 183:
aceptación de las declaraciones fa
Page 184 and 185:
cumplir estos contratos en el arbit
Page 186 and 187:
de su plan de extorsión. Como Donz
Page 188 and 189:
415. Como se expuso anteriormente,
Page 190 and 191:
Demandantes de Lago Agrio y la Rep
Page 192 and 193:
ni reconocible en los Estados Unido
Page 194 and 195:
determine los méritos y registre l
Page 196 and 197:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHE
Page 198 and 199:
TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....
Page 200 and 201:
C. The Conspirators' Campaign of Li
Page 202 and 203:
Plaintiff Chevron Corporation ("Che
Page 204 and 205:
4. To pressure Chevron in the Unite
Page 206 and 207:
Lago Agrio Litigation. Fajardo is a
Page 208 and 209:
Report and publicize its findings.
Page 210 and 211:
j. Alberto Wray ("Wray") is the for
Page 212 and 213:
. Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady
Page 214 and 215:
that the Lago Agrio Plaintiffs who
Page 216 and 217:
Boulder, Colorado; (ii) acted in th
Page 218 and 219:
and/or alter egos in perpetrating t
Page 220 and 221:
concession area. See Yaiguaje, No.
Page 222 and 223:
39. TexPet's total profits over the
Page 224 and 225:
population living in [the] Amazonia
Page 226 and 227:
concentration or condition, the pre
Page 228 and 229:
equiring remediation under the crit
Page 230 and 231:
plaintiffs' attorneys required the
Page 232 and 233:
job." And when the RICO Defendants
Page 234 and 235:
eprise their criminal scheme again
Page 236 and 237:
made all the more real given the pr
Page 238 and 239:
upon the judge the false assertion
Page 240 and 241:
assuming responsibility for remedia
Page 242 and 243:
President Correa, at which the Pres
Page 244 and 245:
[remediating] until we've had a cha
Page 246 and 247:
subpoenaed to testify, I will state
Page 248 and 249:
eports under the name of another of
Page 250 and 251:
conspirators cast aside Dr. Calmbac
Page 252 and 253:
(i) Weeks Before the Court Appointe
Page 254 and 255:
"work committee" to present a "draf
Page 256 and 257:
(ii) The Court Appointed Cabrera as
Page 258 and 259:
Cabrera: (Addressing the public) I
Page 260 and 261:
actual remediation work once the RI
Page 262 and 263:
Spanish. As Beltman would later put
Page 264 and 265:
morning of March 31, the day before
Page 266 and 267:
e called to testify in United State
Page 268 and 269:
appearance that Cabrera was neutral
Page 270 and 271:
not reflect substantial differences
Page 272:
177. The first level of endorsement
Page 275 and 276:
contract with Dr. Peter N. Jones of
Page 277 and 278:
(vii) The RICO Defendants' Attempt
Page 279 and 280:
RICO Defendants and their co-conspi
Page 281 and 282:
personal notes make clear that the
Page 283 and 284:
to "ask for the head of [Chevron's
Page 285 and 286:
allegedly "independent" Cabrera Rep
Page 287 and 288:
tactic." Increasing the pressure in
Page 289 and 290:
management time, reputational ... [
Page 291 and 292:
Amazon Watch and that sum did not i
Page 293 and 294: . Misrepresenting the "Independent"
Page 295 and 296: y Chevron alleging collusion betwee
Page 297 and 298: action," and falsely claimed that C
Page 299 and 300: "court-appointed expert" and that t
Page 301 and 302: should be concerned about the image
Page 303 and 304: 253. The conspirators have also sta
Page 305 and 306: was responsible and claimed that th
Page 307 and 308: 267. These obstruction efforts have
Page 309 and 310: epresentations, despite the fact th
Page 311 and 312: in other Section 1782 proceedings d
Page 313 and 314: U.S. law firms that the RICO Defend
Page 315 and 316: 287. In response to an inquiry from
Page 317 and 318: "The Ecuadorian court was and is we
Page 319 and 320: "improper" under a "traditional Ecu
Page 321 and 322: that Chevron has obtained, Judge Ka
Page 323 and 324: Maazel of Emery Celli, knew that th
Page 325 and 326: 312. Donziger has been working to p
Page 327 and 328: 318. Donziger did not comply. Inste
Page 329 and 330: judgment that, if ultimately render
Page 331 and 332: would have had access to this non-p
Page 333 and 334: 330. The RICO Defendants, acting in
Page 335 and 336: that the order would not prevent De
Page 337 and 338: CLAIMS FOR RELIEF FIRST CLAIM FOR R
Page 339 and 340: 343. The RICO Defendants and their
Page 341 and 342: and then holding out the Cabrera Re
Page 343: corrective action. Further, the RIC
Page 347 and 348: Report, procuring baseless criminal
Page 349 and 350: y participating in a campaign of pu
Page 351 and 352: wires in furtherance of the RICO De
Page 353 and 354: allow the commission of this patter
Page 355 and 356: officials, and Chevron's shareholde
Page 357 and 358: with them-including the law firms o
Page 359 and 360: States or abroad, including any att
Page 361 and 362: WHEREFORE, Chevron prays for judgme
Page 363 and 364: against the Defendants named in thi
Page 365 and 366: § 1964(c). 3. For Chevron's reason
show all

hLpb5

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?