18.02.2013 Views

hLpb5

hLpb5

hLpb5

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

343. The RICO Defendants and their co-conspirators constitute an association-in-fact<br />

enterprise within the meaning of 18 U .S.C. §§ 1961 (4) and 1962( c), referred to hereinafter as the<br />

"Enterprise." Each of the RICO Defendants participated in the operation or management of the<br />

Enterprise.<br />

344. At all relevant times, the Enterprise was engaged in, and its activities affected<br />

interstate and foreign commerce within the meaning of 18 U.S.c. § 1962( c).<br />

Pattern of Racketeering Activity<br />

345. The RICO Defendants conducted or participated, directly or indirectly, in the<br />

conduct, management, or operation of the Enterprise's affairs through a "pattern of racketeering<br />

activity" within the meaning of 18 U .S.c. § 1961 (5) and in violation of 18 U .S.c. § 1962( c), to<br />

wit:<br />

Pattern of Racketeering Activity: Extortion in Violation of Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C )\ 1951<br />

346. At all times material to this Amended Complaint, Chevron was engaged in<br />

interstate and foreign commerce and in an industry that affects interstate and foreign commerce.<br />

347. As described herein, the RICO Defendants have engineered a wide­<br />

ranging campaign of public attacks based on false and misleading statements, trumped up<br />

criminal charges, a threatened and actual fraudulent civil judgment, investigations by<br />

government agencies, and ongoing harassment and disruptions of business operations, and have<br />

demanded the payment of billions of dollars before these activities will cease, all with the intent<br />

and effect of causing a reasonable fear of economic loss on the part of Chevron.<br />

348. As described herein, the RICO Defendants manufactured false evidence<br />

against Chevron and are relying on that false evidence in the sham Lago Agrio Litigation with<br />

the intent and effect of causing a reasonable fear of economic loss on the part of Chevron.<br />

349. As described herein, the RICO Defendants conspired with the Republic of<br />

Ecuador to advance baseless criminal charges against two Chevron lawyers responsible for<br />

executing the 1998 Final Release in order to extort a payment from Chevron.<br />

138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!