18.02.2013 Views

hLpb5

hLpb5

hLpb5

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

their work to "clean up the language so it [would] sound[] more like [Cabrera] and less like a<br />

comment."<br />

168. The RICO Defendants accomplished their ruse in part by asking Powers, the<br />

same Stratus contractor who ghostwrote portions of Cabrera's initial report (see paragraph 151,<br />

supra), to respond to questions that had been raised in connection with the Cabrera Report.<br />

Defendant Maest provided Powers the questions to be answered-questions that were the very<br />

same ones posed by the Lago Agrio Plaintiffs in their September 2008 filing. Powers then<br />

supplied Maest with the answers that are the same as those that are included in Cabrera's<br />

November 2008 report.<br />

169. In addition, the RICO Defendants and their co-conspirators incorporated into<br />

Cabrera's response a second report written by Richard Clapp, another one of their hired<br />

consultants. Just as the RICO Defendants and their co-conspirators had been concerned that<br />

Hinton or Clapp himself would inadvertently disclose the fact that Clapp's first report had been<br />

incorporated "as is" in the form of an annex to the Cabrera Report, they likewise became<br />

concerned that the use of Clapp's second report in Cabrera's response would accidentally be<br />

made public. Beltman warned Donziger, "I don't think we should hand out either [report] as<br />

Clapp's, thereby distributing proof."<br />

170. Beyond the misrepresentations concerning Cabrera's independence and the<br />

authorship of "his" report, the Cabrera Report-without which the RICO Defendants cannot<br />

demonstrate liability or damages-suffers from substantial flaws and fundamental problems.<br />

Determined to "jack up" the damages estimate to $27 billion, the conspirators, among other<br />

egregious defects, attributed all alleged environmental impact from oil operations in the former<br />

consortium area to TexPet and none to Petroecuador, the sole owner of operations in the former<br />

consortium area for the past nearly 20 years and the one responsible for well over 1,400 oil spills<br />

during that time. The report includes millions of dollars of damages for remediation of disposal<br />

pits that do not exist and are, in fact, shadows and other dark objects on aerial photographs. In<br />

addition, the report relies on U.S.-derived cost baselines, standards, and methodologies which do<br />

68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!