18.02.2013 Views

hLpb5

hLpb5

hLpb5

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

attempt to apply it retroactively, the Lago Agrio Litigation is unusual in structure. The<br />

ostensible plaintiffs in the Lago Agrio Litigation are forty-eight named individuals, but it is<br />

unknown whether these individuals consented to have the litigation brought in their names, as<br />

twenty of their signatures were forged in the very document that purported to provide authority<br />

to Ecuadorian counsel to file the complaint.<br />

65. The Lago Agrio Litigation does not seek damages based on personal injuries to<br />

the named Plaintiffs, which, along with claims for individual property damage, is the only type<br />

of claim individuals could bring (see paragraph 57, supra). Rather, relying on the EMA, the<br />

complaint seeks the costs ofremediating broadly defined "environmental damages," the proceeds<br />

of which will not directly benefit the Lago Agrio Plaintiffs. Defendants Donziger, Fajardo and<br />

the other U.S. and Ecuadorian lawyers and investors reportedly expect up to 30% of the<br />

judgment. The Republic of Ecuador reportedly expects 90% of the benefit, although the RICO<br />

Defendants with assistance from Patton Boggs, H5 and other co-conspirators have already laid<br />

out plans to "keep the proceeds out of Ecuador," by placing the funds in a "trust" outside of the<br />

country, under the exclusive control of a trustee they approve. The RICO Defendants requested<br />

that the Front receive an additional amount equal to 10% of the judgment (a fact that Donziger<br />

thought "best if Chevron did not know" out of concern that it "could harm the image" of the<br />

litigation), and the trial court granted that request in its judgment. The individual Lago Agrio<br />

Plaintiffs, on the other hand, will not receive any portion of the judgment, and thus are at most<br />

only nominal plaintiffs.<br />

66. In effect, the RICO Defendants are planning to control nearly all of the proceeds<br />

from the judgment, shutting out the Lago Agrio Plaintiffs, the Republic of Ecuador, and<br />

Petroecuador and setting themselves up as a source of patronage through billions of dollars in<br />

remediation contracts that will be issued following an adverse judgment against Chevron, in a<br />

country whose entire annual Gross Domestic Product is just over $64 billion. In an email<br />

exchange with Fajardo and Donziger, for example, co-conspirator Julio Prieto noted that<br />

"Petroecuador is NOT the one who must contract the remediation companies .... That's our<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!