El uso de Sistemas de Información Geográfica - CDIA-EC ...

El uso de Sistemas de Información Geografica y Sensores Remotos (SR) en Salud Pública
Bogotá, Colombia, 27 al 30 de Marzo de 2006
more effective use of the surveillance data currently collected by some control
programmes to inform the choice of locations where house spraying activities
should be targeted each year (Feliciangeli et al 2003).
References
1. F Acevado, E Godoy, CJ Schofield (2000). Comparison of intervention
strategies for control of Triatoma dimidiata in Nicaragua. Mem. Inst.
Oswaldo Cruz 95(6), 867--871.
2. Beard CB, Pye G, Steurer FJ, Rodriguez R, Campman R, Peterson AT,
Ramsey J, Wirtz RA, Robinson LE (2003). Chagas disease in a domestic
transmission cycle in Southern Texas, USA. Emerging Infect Dis 9:103-5
3. S Brooker, NB Kabatereine, ACA Clements, JR Stothard (2004).
Schistosomiasis control. The Lancet 363: 658-9.
4. Costa J, Peterson AT, Beard CB (2002). Ecological niche modelling and
differentiation of populations of Triatoma brasiliensis, the most important
Chagas disease vector in northeastern Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg 67:516-20.
5. AL De Andrade F Zicker, IG Silva, JM Souza, CM Martelli (1995). Risk factors
for Trypanosoma cruzi infection among children in central Brazil: a case-
control study in vector control settings. Am J Trop Med Hyg 52:183--187.
6. E Dumonteil & S Gorbiere (2004). Predicting Triatoma dimidiata abundance
and infection rate: a risk map for natural transmission of Chagas disease in
the Yucatan peninsula of Mexico. Am J Trop Med Hyg 70:514-9.
7. MD Feliciangeli, D Campbell-Lendrum, C Martinez, D Gonzalez, P Coleman,
C Davies (2003). Chagas disease control in Venezuela: lessons for the
Andean region and beyond. Trends Parasitol 19 (1): 44-9.
8. D Gorla (2002). Remotely sensed environmental variables as indicators of
Triatoma infestans distribution. Ecologia Austral 12:117-27.
9. F Guhl, M Restrepo, V Angulo, C Antunes, D Campbell-Lendrum, C Davies
(2005). Lessons from a national survey of Chagas disease transmission risk
in Colombia. Trends Parasitol 21: 259--262.
28