19.01.2013 Views

S35MZ

S35MZ

S35MZ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Eva Rodríguez Cárdenas<br />

linguistic information (speaker cues). Verbs are<br />

supposed to be more difficult to learn because<br />

they refer to relations within events, and any<br />

event can be conceptualized in terms of a multitude<br />

of different components, because of that<br />

children have to decide which relation or group<br />

of relations in an event is the verb referent.<br />

Children were successful in learning a novel<br />

verb only in the condition in which perceptual<br />

cues coincided with speaker cues to the verb’s<br />

meaning. When presented with conflicting information,<br />

or when both actions offered perceptually<br />

salient results, children failed. This<br />

suggests that the difficulty rests in children’s<br />

attention to a speaker’s cues in the presence<br />

of compelling actions and action results; young<br />

children may only be guided by perceptual<br />

preferences when perceptually salient actions<br />

are available.<br />

Maguire, Hirsh-Pasek, Golinkoff and Brandone<br />

(2008) also focus on the question of word<br />

learning, especially on two hypotheses that<br />

suggest how children extract relations to extend<br />

a novel verb. One of them states that seeing<br />

many different exemplars helps children to<br />

detect the invariant relation between actions,<br />

whereas the other maintains that repetition of<br />

fewer exemplars allows children to move beyond<br />

the entities involved to extract the relation.<br />

The results of this study support the findings<br />

from the latter perspective: children were<br />

significantly better at mapping and extending<br />

novel verb label when they were shown fewer<br />

rather than many exemplars. However, children<br />

will need to see many more exemplars of an<br />

action to acquire an adult-like concept of a<br />

verb’s meaning.<br />

As it has been already stated, nouns are generally<br />

easier to learn than verbs, yet verbs appear<br />

in children’s earliest vocabularies, creating<br />

a seeming paradox. McDonough, Song, Hirsh-<br />

Pasek, Golinkoff and Lannon (2011) propose<br />

that perhaps the advantage nouns have is not a<br />

function of grammatical form class but rather is<br />

related to a word’s imageability. Words with high<br />

136 Esdrújula. Revista de filología<br />

imageability are easier to see as distinct separate<br />

entities than those represented by words<br />

with low imageability, for example verbs. They<br />

discovered a significant relationship between<br />

imageability and parent reported age of acquisition,<br />

that is, words with higher imageability ratings<br />

tend to be acquired earlier than words with<br />

lower imageability ratings. Due to this, early<br />

dominance of nouns may no simply be a function<br />

of form class, rather it may have a conceptual<br />

explanation (highly imageable words may<br />

be easier to learn). Verbs in early vocabulary<br />

are also imageable words often used with limited<br />

and very specific meanings, not reflecting<br />

the breadth of meaning adults use. So here it<br />

is suggested again that although verbs can be<br />

learned very early in vocabulary development,<br />

their meaning has to evolve before they acquire<br />

adult-likeness (Maguire et al., 2008).<br />

It is true, as it has been showed by different<br />

studies, that verbs seem to be more difficult<br />

to learn than nouns because actions are more<br />

complex and difficult to generalize than objects,<br />

but, despite these difficulties, nouns are<br />

not predominant and children actually acquire<br />

and use verbs early during their vocabulary<br />

development. However, this verb use is simpler<br />

than the one made by adults, and only as the<br />

child grows and acquires a wider vocabulary<br />

will he be able to understand it completely.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Although a significant progress has been<br />

made during the last years within the field of linguistics<br />

and first language acquisition, we are<br />

still far from a complete understanding of the<br />

whole process by which infants link a certain<br />

string of phonemes to a certain entity, object<br />

or situation. New and interesting theories have<br />

been developed during this period and, though<br />

some of them were soon discarded, others<br />

leaded to different paths of investigation which<br />

may give us a definite solution to this question<br />

in the future.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!