S35MZ
S35MZ
S35MZ
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Eva Rodríguez Cárdenas<br />
linguistic information (speaker cues). Verbs are<br />
supposed to be more difficult to learn because<br />
they refer to relations within events, and any<br />
event can be conceptualized in terms of a multitude<br />
of different components, because of that<br />
children have to decide which relation or group<br />
of relations in an event is the verb referent.<br />
Children were successful in learning a novel<br />
verb only in the condition in which perceptual<br />
cues coincided with speaker cues to the verb’s<br />
meaning. When presented with conflicting information,<br />
or when both actions offered perceptually<br />
salient results, children failed. This<br />
suggests that the difficulty rests in children’s<br />
attention to a speaker’s cues in the presence<br />
of compelling actions and action results; young<br />
children may only be guided by perceptual<br />
preferences when perceptually salient actions<br />
are available.<br />
Maguire, Hirsh-Pasek, Golinkoff and Brandone<br />
(2008) also focus on the question of word<br />
learning, especially on two hypotheses that<br />
suggest how children extract relations to extend<br />
a novel verb. One of them states that seeing<br />
many different exemplars helps children to<br />
detect the invariant relation between actions,<br />
whereas the other maintains that repetition of<br />
fewer exemplars allows children to move beyond<br />
the entities involved to extract the relation.<br />
The results of this study support the findings<br />
from the latter perspective: children were<br />
significantly better at mapping and extending<br />
novel verb label when they were shown fewer<br />
rather than many exemplars. However, children<br />
will need to see many more exemplars of an<br />
action to acquire an adult-like concept of a<br />
verb’s meaning.<br />
As it has been already stated, nouns are generally<br />
easier to learn than verbs, yet verbs appear<br />
in children’s earliest vocabularies, creating<br />
a seeming paradox. McDonough, Song, Hirsh-<br />
Pasek, Golinkoff and Lannon (2011) propose<br />
that perhaps the advantage nouns have is not a<br />
function of grammatical form class but rather is<br />
related to a word’s imageability. Words with high<br />
136 Esdrújula. Revista de filología<br />
imageability are easier to see as distinct separate<br />
entities than those represented by words<br />
with low imageability, for example verbs. They<br />
discovered a significant relationship between<br />
imageability and parent reported age of acquisition,<br />
that is, words with higher imageability ratings<br />
tend to be acquired earlier than words with<br />
lower imageability ratings. Due to this, early<br />
dominance of nouns may no simply be a function<br />
of form class, rather it may have a conceptual<br />
explanation (highly imageable words may<br />
be easier to learn). Verbs in early vocabulary<br />
are also imageable words often used with limited<br />
and very specific meanings, not reflecting<br />
the breadth of meaning adults use. So here it<br />
is suggested again that although verbs can be<br />
learned very early in vocabulary development,<br />
their meaning has to evolve before they acquire<br />
adult-likeness (Maguire et al., 2008).<br />
It is true, as it has been showed by different<br />
studies, that verbs seem to be more difficult<br />
to learn than nouns because actions are more<br />
complex and difficult to generalize than objects,<br />
but, despite these difficulties, nouns are<br />
not predominant and children actually acquire<br />
and use verbs early during their vocabulary<br />
development. However, this verb use is simpler<br />
than the one made by adults, and only as the<br />
child grows and acquires a wider vocabulary<br />
will he be able to understand it completely.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Although a significant progress has been<br />
made during the last years within the field of linguistics<br />
and first language acquisition, we are<br />
still far from a complete understanding of the<br />
whole process by which infants link a certain<br />
string of phonemes to a certain entity, object<br />
or situation. New and interesting theories have<br />
been developed during this period and, though<br />
some of them were soon discarded, others<br />
leaded to different paths of investigation which<br />
may give us a definite solution to this question<br />
in the future.