20.12.2019 Views

CELERINET AÑO 7 VOL 2

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CELERINET JULY - DECEMBER 2019

Fig. 1 SEM image of deposited gold particles at 575.15K

Fig. 2 SEM Image of different morphologies of the deposited

gold particles at 600.15K

Fig. 3 SEM Image in Dark Field mode showing closed

figure patterns of the deposited Au nanoparticles at

623.15K

From the SEM images, we can observe how

deposited gold particles make line and square

patterns over the NaCl substrates, this being

more evident for the deposited Au nanoparticles

at 575.15K (Fig. 1) and 623.15K (Fig. 3). This

behavior occurs because the gold particles

follow the most energetic favorable geometries

where it can be deposited with the least possible

energy and also to have the greatest adherence

with the NaCl surface, so as the temperature

is increased, the potential energy difference

between the NaCl substrate surface and the Au

nanoparticles rises. However, at 600.15K (Fig.

2), the square or closed like patterns of the

gold nanoparticles on the NaCl substrate seem

to diminish and the line like patterns are the

dominant ones, the reason for this phenomena

is because of the amount of potential energy

between the Au nanoparticles, and the NaCl

substrate reaches a saturation level for that of the

square or closed shape patterns, then when the

temperature is raised again reaching 623.15K

(Fig. 3) the closed shapes or squarelike patterns

become the most abundant ones again and are

even larger than the ones observed at 575.15K.

On Fig. 3, the darkfield mode was used

to observe the contrast between the Au

nanoparticles and the NaCl substrate. In

this figure, we are also able to appreciate

the abundance of Au nanoparticles and the

smoothness or defect-free NaCl substrate. Due

to the fact that Au and NaCl have a different

electronic density of states (DOS) TEM

analysis gives a great contrast between the NaCl

substrates and the gold nanoparticles. As can

be seen on Figures 3 and 4, the deposited Au

nanoparticles can be easily distinguished due to

the high contrast between the gold nanoparticles

and the NaCl substrate. Short deposition times

(1min) for the gold nanostructures may favor a

mono phase formation on the NaCl substrate.

By these series of experiments we can conclude

that a NaCl substrate makes a very suitable

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!