16.05.2016 Views

Paliativos

Libro_Comunicaciones_SECPAL

Libro_Comunicaciones_SECPAL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PO535<br />

Palliative radiotherapy in head neck cancer. Quad-shot schedule<br />

Mari Ángeles González Ruiz 1 , Amanda Ruiz Herrero 1 , Ana Torres García 1 , Cristina Cruz Muñoz 1 , Joaquín José<br />

Cabrera Rodríguez 1<br />

1<br />

Residente Oncología Radioterápica, Badajoz<br />

Introduction: Several palliative radiotherapy regimens has been described for incurable head neck cancer (HNC).<br />

The Quad-shot (Q-S) is a hypofractionated schedule with favorable therapeutic ratio (tumoral response/treatment<br />

toxicity).<br />

This regimen consist on 14 Gy in four fractions, twice a day, for two consecutive days. This cycle is repeated every<br />

three weeks, maximum of three (42 Gy).<br />

Objective: Endpoints: Primary, to evaluate quality of life (QoL) and control of symptoms. Secondary, to evaluate<br />

toxicity.<br />

Methods: Descriptive study of 2 patients (pts) treated from November to January 2015. They had recurrence of<br />

HNC located at retropharyngeal space and maxillary sinus respectively. QoL was evaluated with EORTC QLQ-C30 and<br />

symptoms with Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). Pts rated QoL and symptoms before treatment and<br />

three weeks after each cycle. Toxicity was evaluated with Common Terminology Critera of Adverse Events (CTCAE).<br />

Results: First patient rated his pain in 8 of 10 points according ESAS and QoL in 4 of 7 points. He didn´t has very<br />

severe symptoms in terms of tiredness, nausea, owsiness, anorexia, dyspnea or depression. After the first cycle of<br />

treatment, he rated his pain in 5 of 10 points and QoL in 5 points. After the second cycle, symptons and QoL were<br />

rated in the same score. Second patient didn´t has very severe symptoms and rated her QoL in 4 of 7 points. After<br />

the first cycle, the symptoms score were similar and QoL the same. After the second cycle, she rated her QoL in 5 of<br />

7 points and the symptons score were similar. Both pts are pending to receive the next cycle of treatment. Toxicity<br />

was nil.<br />

Conclusion: In spite of the study have only 2 pts, our preliminary experience support the results of trials: minimal<br />

toxicity and<br />

positive impact on patient´s QoL and control of symptoms.<br />

490

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!