2010 Vol. 4 Num. 2 - GCG: Revista de GlobalizaciÃ³n, Competitividad ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Conditional volatility in sustainable and traditional stock exchange indexes: analysis of the Spanish market118 The evolution of the estimated volatility for each of the three models is shown in Figures7 to 9 (left axis contains their kernel density plot). These figures show that the conditionalvolatility is lower in the case of the FTSE4Good-IBEX than in the IBEX during the periodanalysed. All three univariate models (GARCH, GJR and EGARCH) show a similar behaviourof conditional volatility for both indexes. This ensures the results are more robust.Figure 7: Conditional Volatility under GARCH35302520151050May 08Jul 08Sep 08Nov 08Jan 09Mar 09May 09Jul 09Sep 09Nov 09Jan 10FTSE4Good-IBEXIBEX35Figure 8: Conditional Volatility under GJR35302520151050May 08Jul 08Sep 08Nov 08Jan 09Mar 09May 09Jul 09Sep 09Nov 09Jan 10FTSE4Good-IBEXIBEX35Figure 9: Conditional Volatility under EGARCH35302520151050May 08Jul 08Sep 08Nov 08Jan 09Mar 09May 09Jul 09Sep 09Nov 09Jan 10FTSE4Good-IBEXIBEX35GCG GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY - UNIVERSIA 2010 VOL. 4 NUM. 2 ISSN: 1988-7116
Eduardo Ortas, José M. Moneva & Manuel Salvador5.1.1. Comparing the Models119Table VI shows the results of a comparative study of the estimated univariate modelsanalysing their one-step-ahead predictive behaviour (both on average and at predictionintervals). The model’s goodness of fit is also displayed (computed by means of penalisedlikelihood criteria). More specifically, Table VI shows the values of the Root Mean SquaredError (RMSE), as well as the Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) for the return series. The AkaikeInformation Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Hannan–Quinn criteria(HQ) were also computed. In addition, the empirical one-step-ahead coverage (COV) of theprediction intervals is shown at 95 and 99% confidence levels. Independence Comparisons(INC), Conditional Coverage (CC) and Unconditional Coverage (UC), as described byChristoffersen (1998), are shown.Finally, the mean WIDTH is given as WIDTH =, and the score function,recently proposed by Gneiting and Raftery (2007), is expressed by:LOSS = (12)where I(A) denotes the indicator function of set A. Additionally, y inf,t=andy sup,t =are the upper and lower limits of the one-step-ahead prediction interval fora 100(1- )% confidence level. and are the return and volatility estimates for eachmodel, and denotes the (1- ) quantile of a standard normal distribution.As demonstrated by Gneiting and Raftery (2007), this function provides a proper score ruleto evaluate the predictive behaviour of a model at a given confidence level (100(1- )%),using on one hand, the WIDTH of the one-step-ahead prediction intervals, {(y inf, t,y sup,t); t=1,…,T} and, on the other, the size of deviation from the lack of intervals coverage, both at thelower end and the upper end , which is highlyrelevant information for assessing the risk associated with the estimated risk value for eachmodel.The results show non-significant differences in the mean returns (RMSE, MAD) of the twoseries for each model, with the GARCH model performing better in the MAD criterion andthe GJR model better in the RMSE criterion. The levels of goodness of fit (AIC, BIC, HQ) ofthe three models are also similar, although models that include the asymmetric effect obtainthe better levels. Furthermore, the coverage of the three models is adequate, both at the95 and 99% confidence levels, without rejecting the hypothesis of conditional coverageand independence in any of the models. The most significant differences are found in theprediction intervals WIDTH and LOSS, where it is seen that models including the asymmetriceffect have the least losses.GCG GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY - UNIVERSIA 2010 VOL. 4 NUM. 2 ISSN: 1988-7116
Page 2 and 3:
CARTA DEL EDITOR IN CHIEFEditor in
Page 4 and 5:
SUMARIO SUMMARY SUMÁRIO1Ú2Efectos
Page 6 and 7:
StaffDe la Torre, José, Dean, Chap
Page 8 and 9:
Staff2. MULTINACIONALES, INVERSIÓN
Page 10 and 11:
SELECCIÓN PROCEDURE PROCEDIMENTOIN
Page 12 and 13:
Instrucciones para Autores y Proced
Page 14 and 15:
Instrucciones para Autores y Proced
Page 16 and 17:
16 Efectos de la inversión en I+Ds
Page 18 and 19:
Efectos de la inversión en I+D sob
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
28El Pacto Mundial de las NacionesU
Page 30 and 31:
El Pacto Mundial de las Naciones Un
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
40La política de Industrializació
Page 42 and 43:
La política de Industrialización
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54:
54autorMiguel Blanco-Callejo 1Depar
Page 57 and 58:
Miguel Blanco-CallejoA pesar de que
Page 59 and 60:
Miguel Blanco-CallejoEn 2003, como
Page 61 and 62:
Miguel Blanco-Callejo3.1. Formula 1
Page 63 and 64:
Miguel Blanco-Callejoel patrocinio
Page 65 and 66:
Miguel Blanco-Callejo• Patrocinio
Page 67 and 68: Miguel Blanco-Callejo-Copa Santande
Page 70 and 71: Banco Santander, en la “pole posi
Page 72: 72 Inversión extranjera yCompetiti
Page 76 and 77: Inversion extranjera y Competitivid
Page 88 and 89: 88Inversión en infraestructuras:Cu
Page 90 and 91: Inversión en infraestructuras: Cua
Page 104 and 105: 104Conditional volatility in sustai
Page 106 and 107: Conditional volatility in sustainab
show all

2010 Vol. 4 Num. 2 - GCG: Revista de GlobalizaciÃ³n, Competitividad ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?